Part 4:
The following comprehensive list details allegations of potential federal crimes committed by key figures across government, corporate, and other influential sectors. These individuals, including high-ranking officials, corporate executives, and policymakers, are alleged to have violated laws protecting the integrity of the United States' justice system, constitutional rights, and public trust. From obstruction of justice and suppression of free speech to mishandling classified information and fabricating intelligence, the alleged actions outlined below have far-reaching implications. Together, they paint a troubling picture of systemic abuse of power, lack of transparency, and an erosion of the principles of accountability and fairness. Each entry is meticulously detailed to provide clarity on the allegations, the crimes potentially committed, and the consequences these actions may have on American society and democracy.
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Abuse of FBI Authority for Political Purposes:
2. Misuse of Official Communications:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Suppression of Lawful Political Speech:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Orchestrating Suppression of Hunter Biden Laptop Allegations:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Coordinating Government-Initiated Censorship:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Abuse of Congressional Authority to Suppress Information:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Suppressing Dissenting Narratives on COVID-19 Policies:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Facilitating Federal Pressure to Censor Speech:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Misuse of Intelligence Resources to Shape Public Perception:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Suppression of Lawful Speech on National Security Issues:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Coordinating Government-Supported Media Suppression:
Total Potential Penalty: 10 years imprisonment and $250,000 in fines
1. Misrepresentation of Foreign Intelligence to Shape Policy Outcomes:
2. Suppressing Alternative Foreign Policy Narratives:
End of Part 4.
More coming soon....
I watched the pipe bomber arrest press conference. I found it very unsatisfying. They basically said they’re not going to reveal any of the evidence for the time being, and except in accordance with the legal process.
Judge Pirro is the only one who gave the slightest indication of what the conclusive evidence was. Apparently they traced the sale/purchase of the pipe bomb cap and/or other materials to this individual.
Other than this clip, no evidence was provided during the press conference.
I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.
https://x.com/thomassowell/status/1997423302290079804?s=12
We have a SPECTACULAR Vice President! Watch this clip of JD Vance making an excellent point about our judicial system! 👇🏻
I hope everyone takes the time to listen to Vivas live stream tonight with Enrique Tario (forgive the spelling). The revelations are STAGGERING. He discloses the absolute criminal behavior of several people in his case, what they did and that they are ALL still working at the DOJ AND FBI. If that doesn't tell us all that Pam and Kash, at this point, imho, can be considered complicit, we are all cooked. This is why we voted for Trump, to REMOVE ALL THE BAD ACTORS. Set aside the stupid Epstein files, which is the shiny object in the room at this point, these corrupt and evil actors are STILL THERE and are a much larger threat to us all. 😡
I. Schedule
A. Interview on World Apart RT https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7495641/interview-w-rt
B. Interview w/ Michael Malice https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7495633/michael-malice-interview
C. Interview on Duran https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7477013/live-w-duran
II. The Evidence
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Art of the Day
We the People. It stands out above all in the scribed parchment inside the glass-encased shield inside the Rotunda of Congress with three words bigger than the rest: We The People. Penned on a single sheet of animal skin by Jacob Shallus, it stands out as the Great Charter of American liberty, the profound experiment in self-government, and still stands today as the oldest and shortest written constitution of any major government in the world today. Those words stand out above the rest, written in flowing letters outsized to the text, to remind the world upon what power our government sits: We the People.
B. Wisdom of the Day
“Monopoly is a great enemy” and a “wretched spirit” which poses a greater threat to the free market than as it prevents free enterprise from self-defense. Adam Smith.
C. Cultural Recommendation
Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution tells the tale of what the true founders – the generation that birthed freedom on this continent – thought as they argued the merits of this new document. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7841680-ratification
D. Appearances
II. THE EVIDENCE
*Note: A reminder — links are NOT endorsements of the ideas contained therein. The Library is big, and it mostly consists of ideas I do not personally share.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Art of the Day
One place where AI proves fun is its image generation capacity, whether for memes, dystopian dreams, otherworldly experiences, or translating photos and ideas into the templated work of famous painters. I asked it to convert this meme into a Hopper painting, and it turns out quite fun, as it blurs and blends the images into the spirit of the people and place, as Hopper so masterfully made so often. A Hush Hush of its own accord.
B. Wisdom of the Day
“AI is unfalsifiable and thus unscientific.” Erik Larson.
C. Cultural Recommendation
The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can’t Think the Way We Do. The author, an AI researcher himself, explains why much of AI’s narrative is pure fiction.
D. Appearances
II. THE EVIDENCE
*Note: A reminder — links are NOT endorsements of the ideas contained therein. The Library is big, and it mostly consists of ideas I do not personally share.
