@RobertBarnes @VivaFrei and all. 😡Serious question, is this Stop Nick Shirley Law LEGAL? Nick is an independent journalist afterall and has First Amendment Rights.
From the internet: “The First Amendment protects five key freedoms: freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assemble peacefully, and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. These rights ensure individuals can express themselves and advocate for change without government interference.”
https://x.com/nypost/status/2091353625511535039
“Gov. Gavin Newsom signed California’s controversial “Stop Nick Shirley Act” into law on Saturday, just days after a radical left-wing operative crashed the journalist’s Capitol interview and launched a CRUDE personal attack on him. THIS was a form a sexual harassment.
Just because Nick is a male doesn’t mean he wasn’t sexually harassed. “Terry Schanz, chief of staff to Democratic Assemblywoman Tina McKinnor, allegedly barged into the encounter. [Nick was conducting an interview on the sidewalk outside the Capitol.]
He held up a printed flyer and asked: “Did you guys hear that Nick Shirley has a small penis allegedly?””
Schanz did more than ask. He raised his voice and handed out flyers with the question and a photo of Nick.
Assembly Bill 2624 expands California’s Safe at Home program to employees of nonprofits that serve people navigating the immigration system.
Critics have blasted the measure as a way to intimidate people “trying to shine light on bad behavior.”
The law takes effect Oct. 1, 2027.
The program already covers domestic violence survivors, elder abuse victims and reproductive and gender-affirming health care workers by providing substitute mailing addresses for people considered particularly vulnerable to targeted attacks and violent threats.
Democratic Assemblywoman Mia Bonta (D-Alameda), introduced the bill in February after reports of increased threats and harassment against immigration service providers.
“Our immigrant service providers are living in fear because of extremists looking to demonize the work that they do and the populations they serve,” Bonta said Saturday. “That is an intolerable consequence of the anti-immigrant rhetoric that exists right now.”
Republicans gave the measure the nickname of the “Stop Nick Shirley Act,” coined by Assemblyman Carl DeMaio, R-San Diego.
Shirley, an independent journalist and YouTuber, has made videos following immigrant workers and accusing them of fraud.
He has criticized AB 2624, saying it was created after he “exposed widespread fraud in immigrant communities” in California and Minnesota.
The controversy intensified after Shirley traveled to San Diego following the viral success of videos he produced about Minnesota.
Newsom said in February that Somali daycare providers there were “under siege” following Shirley’s arrival.
Then came a bizarre twist.
On Wednesday, Shirley was conducting a sidewalk interview outside the California State Capitol in Sacramento when Terry Schanz, chief of staff to Democratic Assemblywoman Tina McKinnor, allegedly barged into the encounter.
Schanz earns $17,319 a month, or $207,828 a year, in taxpayer-funded compensation.
He held up a printed flyer and asked: “Did you guys hear that Nick Shirley has a small penis allegedly?”
According to KCRA, multiple complaints have since been filed with the California Legislature’s HR department, and Schanz is expected to face consequences.
The episode is an awkward backdrop for a bill whose supporters say is designed to combat harassment and doxxing.
Schanz has faced other controversy, too.
His name surfaced in a 2025 wrongful-termination lawsuit containing allegations of political bullying and a toxic workplace culture within top Assembly leadership.
His office also faced scrutiny in January over allegations that it pressured nonprofit newsroom CalMatters to alter footage involving McKinnor after a reporter asked her a tough question about an expensive designer handbag.
The fight over AB 2624 even reached the US Senate, where Sen. Ashley Moody, R-Fla., referred to it as the “Protect Fraudsters Act.”
Bonta has rejected that characterization, saying the law does not conflate legitimate journalism with the doxxing targeted by Safe at Home.
But Newsom has now made the measure law.”
