Just saw this.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1FTVptfDij/

Reminds me of Dr. Kory in his book.

PARAPHRASE
Let' examine just 2 examples of serious conflicts of interest by the Principal Investigator Dr. Mills that calls into question as why he was hired to do the death nail on ivermectin. It doesnt cover every study but it does show a blueprint underlying what they were trying to do.

1. First while Dr. Mills was running the TOGETHER Trial in Brazil—which concluded that ivermectin had "no effect whatsoever"—he was simultaneously acting as a lead investigator on the clinical trial pipeline for Merck’s molnupiravir, an alternative on a patentable replacement for ivermectin which had gone off patent many years before so they could not make money from it anymore.

2. Second in the TOGETHER trial assessing ivermectin, the Principal Investigator (PI), Dr. Edward Mills in his presentation to the NIH Collaboratory Grand Rounds (such as his early results briefing on August 6, 2021, and his comprehensive ivermectin review on March 18, 2022), did not cite prior ivermectin use in the main inclusion/exclusion criteria slides. This was important because the trial was conducted in Minas Gerais, Brazil, during a period (mid-2021) when over-the-counter, off-label ivermectin use was exceptionally high. Local municipalities were actively distributing "COVID kits" that included ivermectin, and public health campaigns heavily promoted its prophylactic use and its availability for over the counter purchase at their drugstore. And at no point was this ever mentioned by the team in their final write up.

So net, the control group was "contaminated" with the active drug, making it naturally blunted from a statistical difference perspective between the two arms such that the intervention leg with ivermectin given looked ineffective (futility) even if a biological effect existed.

But unless you read beyond the studies and examine how they were designed and discussed in open conferences you will never get to the truth behind how they manipulated studies to get the answers they want.

Oh I fully realize you will cry bunk and dismiss what is written here. But at least others can see not all is ever as it seems at the surface.