- Art of the Day
- Board Post of Note
- Cultural Recommendation
- Economics
- Politics
- Law
- World
John Solomon and Steven Richards of Just The News just put out a hit-piece on Kyle Seraphin in which they claim that Kyle recklessly discharged a firearm on a firing range that was declared “cold”, diagonal across the line of the instructor who was on the range allegedly repairing a target.
The article states that “Seraphin acknowledged to Just the News in an interview last year that he was "dicking around" when he fired his weapon at his supervisor's target at the range in 2022, but he insisted the incident should not have led to his suspension and termination and that he believes he was a victim of whistleblower retaliation.”
The article goes on to alleged that when asked why he fired on the instructor’s target during the incident, Seraphin “said it is sometimes what you do when you are “d*cking around” with friends on the range.”
Sounds pretty incriminating.
Until you hear what Kyle actually said, and how Just The News absolutely took the word “d*cking around” out of ...
I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.
Ask in replies and answering LIVE at 9ish eastern tonight....
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Barnes Library
I. INTRODUCTION
*Tickets available for August conference.
A. Art of the Week
B. Recommendation of the Week
C. Wisdom of the Week
D. Appearances
II. THE EVIDENCE
A. Barnes Library: Curated Weekly Articles
*Bonus: Beds for those without. https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/6500-volunteers-build-10k-beds-in-24-hours-in-north-carolina/
B. Best of the Board: Five Fun Posts of the Week
*Bonus: Beauty in black & white. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7895352/edinburgh-scotland
C. Homework: Cases of the Week for Sunday
*Bonus: Google settlement. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/google-settlement.pdf
** Bonus: Crazy JP Morgan suit. https://www.livemint.com/news/us-news/i-own-you-jpmorgan-executive-accused-of-drugging-abusing-male-junior-banker-in-lawsuit-key-allegations-11777545493334.html
***Bonus: Infowars. https://courthousenews.com/texas-appeals-court-pauses-the-onions-purchase-of-infowars/
D. Deep Dive: Iran Exit Ramps
*Bonus: Iran’s Lego pr. https://substack.com/@tritaparsi/note/c-251532814
III. CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution, Fifth Amendment & Discovery
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Art of the Week
B. Recommendation of the Week
C. Wisdom of the Week
D. Appearances
II. THE EVIDENCE
*NOTE: A reminder: links are NOT always endorsements of the authors or their interpretation of events, but intended to expand our library of understanding as well as expose ideas of distinct perspective to our own.
A. Barnes Library: Curated Weekly Articles
*Bonus: Old school medical remedies. https://substack.com/@varianavolk/note/c-244056215
B. Best of the Board: Five Fun Posts of the Week
*Bonus: Sarcasm. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7878157/title
C. Homework: Cases of the Week for Sunday
*Bonus: GA 2020 election dispute. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7876741/https-www-courtlistener-com-docket-72267501-pitts-v-united-states-filed-after-filed-before-entr
** Bonus: Amazon caught. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7876825/https-x-com-ric-rtp-status-2046578708035604945
***Bonus: AI fakes. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7877192/robertbarnes-vivafrei-and-all-president-trump-posted-this-on-truth-today-april-22-2026
D. Deep Dive: Iran War Oil Price Impact
*Bonus: Chris Martenson.
III. CLOSING ARGUMENT: Iran War -- Exit, Don't Escalate
Trump's stated objectives of the Iran War cannot be won militarily without too high a price for Americans to pay, primarily in economic casulaties, but also in military casualties and domestic political casualties. Let's weight the risks and the realities of the means to obtain the potential reward.
Rewards: a peaceful, democratic, pro-American, pro-Israel regime in Iran without a nuclear enrichment program, a long-range ballistic missle program, a long-range drone program, underwater drones, or minsubs, fast armed boats, to further secure an open-and-free (or US controlled) Strait of Hormuz for expeditious transport of essential goods, including energy, fertilizer, and supply chain critical supplies like helium, aluminium, and the like.
Risks: Military casualties, in the injuries, disabilities or deaths of American soldiers, as well as diminished interest in service in the military from distrusted use of the military by military prospects, plus loss munitions, armaments, drones, weapons, jets, ships, radars, and military base infrastructure. Related thereto, the loss of perception of power in the projection of power, especially to the global south. Finally, militarily the undermining of our alliances in the middle east and Asia especially. Economic cacualties in the lost transit, and lost long-term control, of critical energy supplies, fertiliziers, and other essential and critical goods for the global supply chain, from helium to aluminum and more. Political casualties at home in fractured domestic political support, diminished capital for legislative actions, and risks of major midterm losses that could stalemate government and produce impeachment.
How does a blockade of the blockade achieve the rewards? The theory is that Iran's inability to export through the Strait will cause them such economic difficulty that they will capitulate to give up their soveriegnty, forfeit nuclear enrichment entirely to the US, drop the missle and drone programs, and turn over power to another regime entirely. I see the chances of that as less than 1%. Iranian nationalism, Persian pride, and Shia sacrifical spirituality make surrender worse than death for this regime and many of the people.
How does a bombing campaign achieve the rewards? If 40 days of 10K plus bombing targets didn't work, why would bombing a few more targets for a few more weeks achieve anything consequential? The no-bridges-and-power-plants war crime full Sherman approach only backfires by destroying all the oil infrastructure of the GCC countries triggering an economic apocalypse for America and the west, a retaliatory risk too great for any rational American leader to consider.
How does an exit achieve the rewards? It doesn't. But it does avoid the risks. And that's why exit rather than escalation is the rational America-First choice.