VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

@Real_RobN 🚨And here it is, King Solomon Reporting:

RE: ‘Arctic Frost’ — it has now been officially referred to @FBIDirectorKash and @AGPamBondi for criminal investigation and prosecution.

Senator Chuck Grassley and Sen. Ron Johnson via WHISTLEBLOWER: CONFIRM a criminal conspiracy between the Biden White House, the FBI’s Washington Field Office, prostitutes from the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., and Special Prostitute Jack Smith — to plan, approve, and execute Arctic Frost with the intent to frame, arrest, prosecute, and imprison Donald J. Trump, effectively attempting to overthrow the constitutional republic of the United States ahead of the 2024 presidential election.

Operation ‘Arctic Frost’ formed the basis of Special Prostitute Jack Smith’s false elector case, under which President Donald Trump was later charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States for his campaign’s efforts to assemble alternate slates of electors — which that the United States government was overthrown during the 2020 election.

Senator Chuck Grassland and Senator Ron Johnson:
“We have obtained additional Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) communications through legally protected whistleblower disclosures that show a conspiracy among anti-Trump FBI agents and prosecutors in setting up and advancing the Arctic Frost investigation.

As we have explained in our previous correspondence, Arctic Frost was the codename for the investigation which ultimately became Jack Smith's elector case against President Donald Trump.”

In other words: not only did Jack Smith know Trump had given the FBI permission, but he also tampered with the evidence, lied to the court about it, spied on members of Congress in an attempt to overthrow the Republican Party — and got caught.

Video https://x.com/real_robn/status/1978505593364308452

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
October 13, 2025
Tom Homan

Here's the breakdown!

00:13:34
October 11, 2025
Trans Scandal

This is a banger of a vlawg. Enjoy!

00:10:26
October 10, 2025
Vance Boelter UPDATE

Here it is.

Divorce

00:09:03
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Questions for Bourbon w/ Barnes: Wednesday, October 15, 2025

Ask in replies and answering LIVE at 9ish eastern tonight. A top topic tonight suggested from a Board commenter: could Trump be playing 3d chess w/ a secret deal w/ Russia?

Judges think, they have presidential powers!

post photo preview
post photo preview
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Wednesday, October 15, 2025

I.  INTRODUCTION

A. Art of the Day

  • Ceaselessly drawn to these surreal living places that merge the inner and outer worlds, drawn evermore to the windowed view from the inner safety of sheltered embrace, underneath the climbing ceilings and fitted with great old art, all of it inviting us both inside and outside at the same time, witnessing nature inside our own minds, matching God's archives of nature to the conscience of the soul, like holding a mirror to beauty itself.

B. Wisdom of the Day

  • A truth about a man that revealed his character: “I would rather earn 1% off a 100 people’s efforts than 100% of my own efforts.” John D. Rockefeller.

C. Cultural Recommendation

  • How Big Oil Conquered the World by James Corbett.

D. Appearances

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Tuesday, October 14, 2025

I.  INTRODUCTION

A. Art of the Day

A near perfect nook: enveloped by books, with a welcoming window to watch the world outside in between getting devoured by the latest text of worthy reading, a chair to embrace you, wooden floors, high ceilings, and warm lamps. The latte on the desk finishes it off right.

B. Wisdom of the Day

“Justice depends on what the Judge ate for breakfast.” Legal realism school.

C. Cultural Recommendation

Documentary by Del BigTree on vaccination impact on health. https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com

D. Appearances

  • Barnes Brothers
    placeholder

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Friday, October 10, 2025

I.   INTRODUCTION

A. Art of the Day

The symmetry of shape, the mirrored reflections off the still water, the delights of the desert each mirror and balance each other in this photograph that reminds me of a still painting, attracting introspective thought by getting lost in its perspective of nature meets man.

B. Wisdom of the Day

“Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding.” Albert Einstein.

C. Cultural Recommendation

In the Deep State themed films, shows, and book, a personal favorite is Rubicon. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1389371/

D. Appearances

 

*Note: A reminder — links are NOT endorsements of the ideas contained therein. The Library is big, and it mostly consists of ideas I do not personally share.  

 

II. THE EVIDENCE

A.   Daily News of Interest

*Bonus: Dolly not dead. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15174635/Dolly-Parton-breaks-silence-health-condition-sister-asked-prayers-country-singer.html

B.    Daily Deep Dive: Gaza Peace

*Bonus: Before and after Hamas. https://martindicaro.substack.com/p/before-and-after-hamas

C. Cases of Consequence

*Bonus: Mail in ballots at SCOTUS. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-568_7l48.pdf

III.   CLOSING ARGUMENT: Free Speech Rights on Campus

  • State universities are state actors, and as such, they are subject to the restraints imposed by the Constitution and by concomitant state laws in many jurisdictions. We start with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
  • “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech…or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” These three coequal protections cover each aspect of speech – speech itself; the assembly often necessary to effectuate speech; and the petitioning process required to make it meaningful in many instances. As related to the university, the first two predominate.
  • As I had reason to remind myself recently, many state laws go further. Take for example Tennessee Code 49-7-2405. Tennessee law reinforces students “right to free speech” enforced through institutions affording students “the broadest latitude to a speak any issue” with a specific prohibition that it “not to be suppressed because the ideas put forth are through by some or even by most members of the community to be offensive, immoral, indecent, disagreeable, radical or wrongheaded.” In other words, no so-called hate speech exception. In the organizational context, the law specifically prohibits an school to “deny student activity fee funding to a student organization based on the viewpoints” of that organization. The only prohibited conduct is harassment, defined as “unwelcome conduct directed toward a person that is discriminatory on a basis prohibited by federal, state or local law, and that is so severe, pervasive and objectively offensive that it effectively bars the victim’s access to an educational opportunity or benefit.”
  • The principal Supreme Court case on the subject derives from the SDS movement in the 1960 and 1970s on college campuses – the Students for a Democratic Society. As the Supreme Court reiterated: “the vigilant protection of constitutional freedoms is nowhere more vital than in the community of American schools.” Academic freedom is freedom of speech for students and the associational rights embodied therein with the right to peaceably assemble. Indeed, the right to organize on campus derives from the marriage of those three First Amendment freedoms forementioned – the freedom of association is “implicit in the freedoms of speech, assembly and petition.”
  • As the High Court held in Healy: “There can be no doubt that denial of official recognition, without justification, to college organizations burdens or abridges that associational right.”  As a disfavored “prior restraint” on student’s future speech, “a heavy burden rests on the college to demonstrate the appropriateness of the action” and that appropriateness is limited to “preventing disruption on campus” from violent conduct, not a heckler’s veto.
  • There is no place more essential to the exchange of ideas, robust debate, and the freedom of speech than a college campus in the very origination of ideas for many people during their intellectual coming of age. Protecting First Amendment freedoms for organizations like Turning Point USA thus remains essential to respecting the legacy of Charlie Kirk and enforcing the law of the land in our foundational formational documents of the very First Amendment in our rightly famed Bill of Rights. 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals