VivaBarnesLaw
News • Politics • Culture
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Vaccine Mandate Protest Letter

No authorship claim or copyright asserted...this letter just came to me in a bottle, and I have no idea who might have penned it, nor can I possibly vouch for it, and what you fine folks do with it is entirely in your own hands, as the Gentlemen of the Bar remind me I can proffer no general legal advice in the matter, and must officially disclaim proffering any such advice here...edit and excise as you see fit, amend and append as you desire, and claim authorship or anonymity as may best befit you...as always, as you wish...

Dear Boss,

Compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law, and subjects the employer to substantial liability risk, including liability for any injury the employee may suffer from the vaccine. Many employers have reconsidered issuing such a mandate after more fruitful review with legal counsel, insurance providers, and public opinion advisors of the desires of employees and the consuming public. Even the Kaiser Foundation warned of the legal risk in this respect. (https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/key-questions-about-covid-19-vaccine-mandates/)

Three key concerns: first, while the vaccine remains unapproved by the FDA and authorized only for emergency use, federal law forbids mandating it, in accordance with the Nuremberg Code of 1947; second, the Americans with Disabilities Act proscribes, punishes and penalizes employers who invasively inquire into their employees' medical status and then treat those employees differently based on their medical status, as the many AIDS related cases of decades ago fully attest; and third, international law, Constitutional law, specific statutes and the common law of torts all forbid conditioning access to employment upon coerced, invasive medical examinations and treatment, unless the employer can fully provide objective, scientifically validated evidence of the threat from the employee and how no practicable alternative could possible suffice to mitigate such supposed public health threat and still perform the necessary essentials of employment.

At the outset, consider the "problem" being "solved" by vaccination mandates. The previously infected are better protected than the vaccinated, so why aren't they exempted? Equally, the symptomatic can be self-isolated. Hence, requiring vaccinations only addresses one risk: dangerous or deadly transmission, by the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic employee, in the employment setting. Yet even government official Mr. Fauci admits, as scientific studies affirm, asymptomatic transmission is exceedingly and "very rare." Indeed, initial data suggests the vaccinated are just as, or even much more, likely to transmit the virus as the asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic. Hence, the vaccine solves nothing. This evidentiary limitation on any employer's decision making, aside from the legal and insurance risks of forcing vaccinations as a term of employment without any accommodation or even exception for the previously infected (and thus better protected), is the reason most employers wisely refuse to mandate the vaccine. This doesn't even address the arbitrary self-limitation of the pool of talent for the employer: why reduce your own talent pool, when many who refuse invasive inquiries or risky treatment may be amongst your most effective, efficient and profitable employees?

First, federal law prohibits any mandate of the Covid-19 vaccines as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only vaccines. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the "option to accept or refuse administration" of the Covid-19 vaccine. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3 ) This right to refuse emergency, experimental vaccines, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. (http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ ). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must "be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision" for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is. The Nuremberg Code prohibited even the military from requiring such experimental vaccines. (Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003).

Second, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).) Indeed, the ADA prohibits employers from invasive inquiries about their medical status, and that includes questions about diseases and treatments for those diseases, such as vaccines. As the EEOC makes clear, an employer can only ask medical information if the employer can prove the medical information is both job-related and necessary for the business. (https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/questions-and-answers-enforcement-guidance-disability-related-inquiries-and-medical). An employer that treats an individual employee differently based on that employer’s belief the employee’s medical condition impairs the employee is discriminating against that employee based on perceived medical status disability, in contravention of the ADA. The employer must have proof that the employer cannot keep the employee, even with reasonable accommodations, before any adverse action can be taken against the employee. If the employer asserts the employee’s medical status (such as being unvaccinated against a particular disease) precludes employment, then the employer must prove that the employee poses a “safety hazard” that cannot be reduced with a reasonable accommodation. The employer must prove, with objective, scientifically validated evidence, that the employee poses a materially enhanced risk of serious harm that no reasonable accommodation could mitigate. This requires the employee's medical status cause a substantial risk of serious harm, a risk that cannot be reduced by any another means. This is a high, and difficult burden, for employers to meet. Just look at the all prior cases concerning HIV and AIDS, when employers discriminated against employees based on their perceived dangerousness, and ended up paying millions in legal fees, damages and fines.

Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information, may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.(https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html )

Finally, forced vaccines constitute a form of battery, and the Supreme Court long made clear "no right is more sacred than the right of every individual to the control of their own person, free from all restraint or interference of others." (https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/141/250)

With Regards,
Employee of the Year

XXX

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Live Streamed on February 3, 2023 3:17 PM ET
February 03, 2023
Live With Kyle Rittenhouse!

Live With Kyle Rittenhouse!

01:10:01
Live Streamed on February 2, 2023 9:08 PM ET
LIVE! Bourbon w/ Barnes: Thursday, February 2, 2023

Who is Konstanin Kisin (the rude guy Viva got stuck with while I had fun on the Duran)? Content creators: Independence v. Influence? Answering critics & questions alike...

01:05:10
Live Streamed on February 1, 2023 9:20 PM ET
LIVE! Bourbon w/ Barnes: Wednesday, February 1, 2023

Discussing working class industrial state voters, the brilliance of Andor, Murdaugh trial, and answering your questions...

01:06:43
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Barnes Law School: 2nd Amendment Victory!

Enjoy this podcast deep dive into the case, much like a single session of a law school class.

Barnes Law School: 2nd Amendment Victory!
August 14, 2021
Viva on Mississauga Radio

I was on the Richard Syrett show the other day. Here is the audio. I hope I was good... Radio is such a difference format from YouTube. So... many... ad and traffic interruptions. lol

Viva on Mississauga Radio
Live chatted 12 hours ago
Sunday with Viva & Barnes will be tomorrow, but...

Barnes is in transit today, so the Sunday Viva & Barnes will be tomorrow night. But tonight I will be interviewing Stephanie de Garay - Maddie's mother. If you don't know Maddie's story, you will want to tune in. If you do know her story, you will want to tune in. Tonight at 18:00

placeholder
Yeonmi Park

I’m listening to Yeonmi Park on Joe Rogan. She escaped North Korea. It’s a very interesting interview. Hopefully I can get Yeonmi on for a stream. One particularly poignant part that I just got to, about two hours in. “How can you fight for freedom when you don’t know you are a slave”. Describing how the second generation of slaves in North Korea don’t even know what freedom is to know that they are slaves. https://open.spotify.com/episode/0G5o6GYjWgbSvKG3W2W2xO?si=8zaBFbftTCudHI-RzrnxFQ&context=spotify%3Ashow%3A4rOoJ6Egrf8K2IrywzwOMk

February 03, 2023
Post-interview selfie

Hope you all enjoyed the interview! Let me know what you think. And enjoy the post-interview selfie!

post photo preview
post photo preview
Barnes Brief: Weekend of February 4, 2023

Schedule This Week

  • The Sunday show will shift to Monday, as I will be in transit Sunday.
  • Wednesday’s Sidebar will be with cultural commentator Nina Infinity.
  • Bourbon will be live after the show on Monday and Wednesday, then return Thursday, but skip Tuesday due to travel commitments.
  • The Vegas meetup moved to March 12, and will be a smaller event for 50 guests, with dinner served, from 5 p.m. to 10 p.m. Future events to be announced only after the venue is committed and booked, with aims to hold meetups in different parts of the country every other month, or so. My apologies for the rescheduling.

The Introduction: News in Brief

  • China balloon shot down over the ocean.
  • Germany’s industrial engine shutting down over Russian energy sanctions.
  • Labor report of 500K+ new jobs contradicted by other government labor report showing less than 100K new jobs in January.
  • Elon Musk wins again! Defeats billion-dollar securities class action over “taking it private” Tweet.
  • Credit card debt hit all time high, while personal savings dipped to near all-time lows.
  • House bill stopping 87K new IRS agents hits hurdles in Senate.
  • ChatGPT offers subscription services that may cheaply substitute for writers in a range of professions.
  • Arctic blasts freeze northeast with power price spikes.  
  • DeSantis revoked liquor license from bar hosting kid drag events.
  • Biden hates Iowa, and DNC formally replaces it with South Carolina as 1st primary. That also profits Kamala Harris if she were the candidate.

Wisdom of the Day: “All warfare is based on deception.” Sun Tzu.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Barnes Brief

Schedule This Week

  • Wednesday: Barnes Brief, George Gammon & Bourbon w/ Barnes at 9ish eastern
  • Thursday: LIVE with the Duran at 1 p.m. eastern & Bourbon w/ Barnes at 9ish
  • Friday: Hush Hush: Origins of The Freemasons
  • VIP Meet-Up: Sunday, February 26, 2023, Las Vegas, from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m.

The Introduction: News in Brief

  • Fed hikes 25 basis points, as expected.
  • More Biden home searches for classified document stash.
  • Strikes rock UK.  
  • Nikki Haley preps 2024 Presidential run. She’s the Deep State’s favorite.
  • As MacGregor predicted, Ukraine wants nuclear weapons.
  • Germany convicts activist of crime of being anti-war.
  • Jordan Peterson turns into a war-hawk on Iran, a particular obsession of his new sponsor, Daily Wire
  • Insurance analysts disclose likely 7% increase in deaths per vaccine.
  • Musk’s goal to use WeChat as his model for Twitter continues, as Twitter tries to get into payment processing.
  • Tom Brady retires. Again.

Wisdom of the Day: “They want to ship your jobs overseas and then your kids overseas to fight in foolish wars.” Donald Trump.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Barnes Brief: Tuesday, January 31, 2023

Announcements

  • Schedule for Barnes Brief: Monday, Wednesday and Friday, to be published 3x/week. When legal matters call, publication may be delayed. The structure will be top-10 headlines available to all, and for subscribers, a top-10 of curated, interesting article links, and a reasoned rant.
  • Schedule for Bourbon w/ Barnes: Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday & Thursday at 9ish p.m. eastern time, except when in transit or in court. The average length will be 45 minutes, or so.
  • Book Club & Box Office will be review videos rather than live shows, and Barnes Law School podcasts and publications will continue as well.
  • Hush Hush coming this week: The Assassination of Huey Long & Who Are The Freemasons?
  • Other Shows’ Schedule This Week: Wednesday with George Gammon & Thursday LIVE with the Duran at 1 p.m. eastern.
  • 1st VivaBarnes LIVE meetup: Sunday, February 26, 2023, Las Vegas, from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m., with location and tickets to be announced. The utility of this schedule is it allows people to drive in the same day and drive out if they live within 4 to 5 hours or so, and also allow people to fly in and fly out same day if that’s what they want to do. It also allows those who want to enjoy the location to actually enjoy the location with this midday schedule that frees up the evening before and the evening after. (Rekieta’s Vegas meet up is Sunday night from 8 to midnight.) Also, we likely won’t do a buffet, so folks can eat before/after the event as they wish in Vegas, but we may have some special snacks available. Doors open at 2 to meet and greet, live show from 3 to 5, and personal audience-only Q&A from 5 to 6. We will live-stream the Sunday show with guests Eric Hunley and Mark Groubert answering a live Q&A from the audience. Likely location will be a short drive from either the Strip or downtown Las Vegas, so hotels on the Strip, in downtown, or off-strip all suffice. A guide to Vegas hotels will be posted by me this week. Ticket costs will be priced to cover all costs of the event, make it a valuable event, and compensate for time. I anticipate 4 meetups each year in different parts of the country. I anticipate a ticket of $200/person with maximum tickets to be sold of 250 per event. I want each person to get the chance to have real interaction with fellow members of the board and Viva and I. Tickets to go on sale by end of this week.

The Introduction: News in Brief

  • Three+ years later, they finally plan to end “the emergency.” But now Biden admin thinking about invoking emergency powers to impose new abortion laws.
  • CDC admits they overcounted Covid hospitalizations.
  • More acknowledge: Biden classified docs problem kills Trump probe. They switch to New York DA to indict Trump for Stormy Daniels payments instead.
  • Google caught deleting internal company chats over its monopolistic practices.
  • Two-thirds of Americans admit living paycheck to paycheck.
  • Dallas Fed says recession incoming.
  • Central banks demand for gold reached highest level since oil shock of the 1970s.
  • Turkey rejects Finland & Sweden application to join NATO.
  • SEC admitted sale of LBRY tokens in the 2ndary market is not a security.
  • Haley 4th in her home state of South Carolina, with Trump strong 1st. JD Vance endorses Trump.

Wisdom of the Day: “Are you so blind that you don’t even see what I am? I’m your easiest problem and your gonna kill me?” Michael Clayton.

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available Now
app store google store
Powered by Locals