VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

The Scott Horton Show: Douglas Macgregor On Ukraine, China, and the Military Industrial Complex 2023.03.07

This is my summary of the interview. It is not a transcript. All comments are from the Colonel unless marked by SH (Scott Horton).

In the last year, Ukraine has suffered 200k soldiers killed, 200-300k wounded. Russia has had 20-25k soldiers killed, 75k wounded. These are estimates based on open source reports. The huge differential in casualties reflects the 10-1 advantage the Russians have in stand-off attack weapons (artillery, missiles, etc.).

Russia now occupies 22-23% of Ukraine. The land it occupies represents 90% of the Ukrainian GDP and most of its industry. This area is historically Russian.

Russia started the war with a small force. It believed that its attack would force Ukraine and the West to the negotiating table. After several months, Russia realized that the USA would not agree to negotiations. It then began preparations to fight a high-end conventional war. This led to a call-up of reserves and opening up factory production of conventional weapons. Forecast was for a winter offensive to start once the ground froze solid.

The winter in Ukraine was short, about 2-3 weeks. This was not enough to freeze the ground solid. It is now mud season in Ukraine, making transport very difficult. The Colonel predicted it would take all of March and April to dry. This suggests the Russian offensive could start in May-June timeframe. The Colonel thinks that the offensive will seek to cut off the Ukrainian border with Poland.

No one in DC will admit that they are wrong about the war in Ukraine.

SH DC is now urging we send weapons to Ukraine to hit Crimea.

“Delusional.” We have sent many weapons to Ukraine, none have been game changers. There is now talk of send F-16 fighters to Ukraine. Two Ukrainian pilots are reportedly in USA for F-16 flight training. If Ukraine gets F-16s, they will use contractors to fly them. We must expect F-16 losses to Russian air defenses, which are excellent. This could lead Russia to attack Ukraine rear areas, like Poland. So far, Russia has exercised great restraint with the Ukraine rear areas.

NATO is very divided, with many member countries feeling betrayed by USA decisions and guidance. Europe now sees Russian forces massing on the edge of Europe. Will Germany break first? The German Prime Minister is in trouble. Polling in Germany shows 70-80% want the Foreign Minister to resign after she said Germany was at war with Russia in Ukraine. A no confidence vote in Germany is certain to happen, but the timing is difficult to predict. When the crack comes in NATO, it will be dramatic.

NATO is also very weak. It cannot deliver the equipment promised to Ukraine. News reports claim that a German Leopard tank sent to Ukraine was captured. And its Polish crew was captured. This happened near Bakhmut.

The Ukrainian press are reporting on conditions in the front at Bakhmut. The Kyiv Independent said that Ukrainian front-line troops have a 30-70% chance of making it back alive. The same article reported that Ukraine is running out of ammo. The Colonel notes that Ukraine is conscripting teenagers and old men and sending them into battle with little training.

Everyone underestimated the ammo use in the Ukraine war and the level of casualties in the war. The effectiveness of weapon systems was overestimated. A collapse is clearly coming. What will happen then?

SH DC is saying that if Ukraine collapses, then we can replicate the Russian occupation of Afghanistan.

Everyone misjudged the Ukraine situation. Russian started the war with the plan of negotiations leading to implementation of the Minsk Accords. A year later, Russia is saying if you want war, here it comes. But the weather did not cooperate. Russia will wait for the dry season, and then the movement will begin. Until that time, Russia will constantly hit Ukrainian front lines with heavy bombardments, causing many casualties.

Russia will end the war by marching to the Polish border. The Colonel’s supposition is that when the Russians close on the Dnieper River, Europe will say enough. If the war continues, how long before it spills over to Poland and other NATO countries?

SH Why is the China threat being pushed by DC?

It is a sign that DC is realizing that Ukraine is lost and it is time to change the subject. People in the USA must realize that China is not going to invade the USA or invade Taiwan.

SH Mearsheimer has predicted that the Biden Administration will escalate in Ukraine.

The US Army would be lucky to scrape together 50k combat troops on the ground in Ukraine. It won’t happen. The US Navy could intervene, but would take heavy losses. Russians have submarines and would use them on US Navy warships. Russia could also attack shipping in the North Atlantic, which would end the ground war very quickly. Expect DC to change the subject. If USA does escalate, then NATO will split, new governments would form in Europe, and the new governments would ignore the USA. Instead, the USA will change the subject and turn to China.

SH What about China sending fentanyl to the USA through Mexico?

China sends ingredients to Mexico for fentanyl. It is the Mexican drug cartels that make the fentanyl and ship it across the open border into the USA. The obvious fix is to close the open border with Mexico.

SH USA has increased the opium supply in SE Asia over the last 20 years. Turnabout by China is predictable.

China is an attractive scapegoat. Who sent industry to China? It started under Reagan, and has continued under all the Presidents since then. Our ruling class sold us out.

China acutely remembers the opium wars of the 19th Century. The Royal Navy forced China ports to unload opium. China was powerless to stop this. They have not forgotten this.

We need to compete economically with China. It makes no sense to wage war with China over things we allowed to happen in the USA. We need to take action. We need to understand that the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) is a massive money machine.

SH Conservatives like to play the tough guy role, and urge us to stop The Yellow Peril from China. But here you are, one of the toughest guys around, saying, “Come on.”

I’m not sure I am that influential. It is OK to not believe The Yellow Peril narrative, and to question USA foreign policy. War with China is easily avoided. We need to look inward, and defend the American people. We need to stop offensive attacks on other countries.

SH With the fall of the USSR, it put the USA in charge of the world. It gave the USA a chance to set up a unipolar world before other countries in the world got rich. Now, 30 years later, Americans won’t accept that other countries got rich and it is no longer a unipolar world.

The USA cannot be the dominate power all over the world. You are right. There are elements in the DC elites, such as the neo-cons, who believe in permanent revolution around the world. What we need to do is to consolidate our industries and take care of the USA people. This is not part of the money machine that is the MIC. A major bankruptcy is coming. It is like the 2008 financial crisis, only worse.

SH Agree. The collapse of the money/banking system will save us from WW3.

We need to do business with other countries peacefully. We need a long-term perspective, with devotion to our country. There is lots of anger now, we will see how it plays out politically. The two major political parties are the same, we need a third force to make genuine change.

SH The legacy media talk of the MIC as a debunked conspiracy theory. Your view?

Most military types follow orders and do their best with the weapons they are given. Decisions are made at a high level for weapons, treating weapons as a money pit. Right decisions do not flow from this. An example is the M1 Abrams tank. The gas turbine engine in this tank runs out of fuel quickly. It has a huge heat signature that satellites can read. It needs the excellent diesel engine used in the Leopard tank. But it has not been changed. People are on a runaway train as politicians and 3-4 star generals and admirals make decisions. Or, decisions are not made and the defense contractors build things on their own. Eisenhower was right about the MIC, but he did not anticipate how badly it would turn out.

SH Ron Paul often remarks that we get the government we deserve. We need a consensus to rise up to stop this.

Agree. The Russian population now wants blood in Ukraine. We are fortunate that Putin has exercised restraint in Ukraine.

Popular sentiment does make a difference. Chaos from economic issues will drive changes. People will still want to eat, to heat their homes, and to drive their car.

SH But the Biden Administration is the Obama team. We have to remove these people.

Agree.

SH How big is the threat of nuclear war?

It is possible, but unlikely. Russians do not want a nuclear war. They will only go nuclear if they are attacked by nuclear weapons, or have solid evidence that a nuclear strike is imminent on Russia.

USA Secretary of State Blinken understands nuclear weapons are the ultimate nightmare to avoid at all costs. There is no evidence that the Defense Department want a war with Russia. General Milley made an honest comment a few weeks back. He said that the Ukrainian military was on the ropes and it was time for a negotiated agreement between Russia and Ukraine. The White House told him to shut up and he now repeats the official narrative. We need an off-ramp for the Ukraine conflict, and we need it quickly. The longer we wait, the more the risks multiply.

Russia is in the driver’s seat now. We are not. It will get ugly for NATO. The future will not be like the past, we cannot do a linear projection of current trends to understand what is coming. We are at an inflection point for the planet earth.

https://scotthortonshow.substack.com/p/douglas-macgregor-on-ukraine-china#details

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
SNEAK PEEK! Interview with George Simion

Grok summary:

In an exclusive interview, George Simion, a prominent Romanian political figure, shares his bold vision for the nation's future. The charismatic leader discusses his strategies to tackle pressing issues and rally public support. This concise yet revealing conversation offers a glimpse into Simion's ambitions and unfiltered perspectives.

01:10:02
March 29, 2025
Rachel Gilmore

It's a good one. Enjoy!

00:10:23
March 27, 2025
Behind the scenes

I’m totally getting a picture with RFK Junior!

00:01:03
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
1776 Law Center Conference & Fundraiser

Pick the date: July 4th weekend or a different weekend? You choose. Event will include a masterclass conference, a hush hush conference, a live Bourbon, a live show & a special fundraiser dinner, with event scheduled from Friday night to Sunday night.

Questions for Bourbon with Barnes: Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Ask in replies and answering Live at 9ish eastern tonight...

@Oalaeho asked how you'd frame Agenda 21 etc in the same world view.


Someone who subscribes to this critique of the Progressive State—seeing it as a technocratic, bureaucratic, and often unethical managerial regime—would likely view Agenda 21 and similar UN initiatives (such as Agenda 2030, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and the Great Reset) as extensions of this same globalist technocratic order. They would interpret these plans as attempts to expand the reach of the managerial elite, further reducing national sovereignty, eroding individual freedoms, and consolidating power into unelected global institutions.

Core Concerns About Agenda 21 from This Perspective

1. Bureaucratic Expansion Without Democratic Accountability

Agenda 21, introduced at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, outlines a broad framework for sustainable development, influencing national and local policies worldwide. However, critics from this worldview would argue that:

  • It enables ...
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Friday, March 15, 2025

Schedule

Future

  • Friday at 9ish pm eastern: Betting w/ Barnes AMA
  • Saturday Night at 9 pm eastern: Comedy Movie TBD
  • Sunday at 6 pm eastern: Viva & Barnes, Law for the People

Book Recommendation: Framed by John Grisham. Non-fiction work on wrongfully convicted.

 

Art of the Day: Geometric ancient art found on walls, temples, and pottery from centuries ago across civilizations, societies, and geographies around the globe. Recently highlighted by the likes of Graham Hancock and other explorers of ancient civilizations, this unique geometric art depicted here in Greek pottery, represents a kind of collective unconscious across ancient societies. It stood out to me for a different reason: a tattoo artist from Tahiti (where the word tattoo originated) designed an engagement ring tattoo for me a decade+ ago mimicking the same identical design, though I neither requested nor he suggested it. Something deep in the human consciousness calls to this simple symbol of truth in life.

 

Wisdom of the Day: “The power in the judicial will enable them to mould the government into almost any shape they please.” Brutus, Anti-Federalist, 1788.

Closing Argument: Time to Judge the Judges

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Friday, February 28, 2025

Schedule

Future

  • Friday at 9ish pm eastern: Betting w/ Barnes AMA
  • Saturday Night at 9 pm eastern: Movie TBD
  • Sunday at 6 pm eastern: Viva & Barnes, Law for the People

Book Recommendation: Have in a Heartless World by Christopher Lasch. The Family vs. the State.  https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/724188.Haven_in_a_Heartless_World

Art of the Day: The last photo of my father with the family around Christmas 1985. I sit right in front of him, with my brother and mother next to him, and my sisters Martha, Brenda and little Laura rounding out the family photo. My father loved Christmas, and lived for it, and it remains my first thought whenever I think of him. I think about this as I try to defend a father stripped of the chance to even talk to his son; I can only imagine what horrifying effect such an action could have had on my father, and it reminds me why taking on difficult cases against difficult odds remains critical to defend people like him from the harms the more powerful can inflict. The family remains the haven in a world especially when that world turns heartless.

Wisdom of the Day: “It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men.” Frederick Douglas.

The Library: Five Curated Articles of the Week

  1. Zelensky Exposed
  2. IRS Leaks
  3. Trump tariffs
  4. Bureaucracy Revealed
  5. Epstein files hidden

*Bonus: Math to the rescue?

 

Top 5 Cases TBD Sunday

  1. Senseless in Seattle
  2. Big Tech vs. Parents
  3. Hollywood drama: Privacy in Discovery
  4. SCOTUS: Trump
  5. SCOTUS: Prosecutorial Duties

*Bonus: Washington Right to Parent

 

Closing Argument: Senseless in Seattle

 

  • The upcoming trial of Kurt Benshoof is a most peculiar one – the government seeks to imprison him for a decade or more. What purports to justify this? Benshoof texted his son, sought legal claims to his car, home and custody of his son, and texted and called his son’s mother concerning his son. The government labels this “stalking” and “harassment.” Why? Because Benshoof’s real crime is his beliefs.
  • Anyone familiar with family disputes and divorces knows that people involved in such disputes can be quite unkind to one another, but rarely is it prosecuted as a crime. Benshoof’s case reveals a new front of the culture conflict: weaponizing the legal system to take away the parental rights of dissidents in a war on the family, and especially a war on fathers.
  • Benshoof objected to trans ideologies being taught to his son, objected to vaccine and mask mandates on his son, and objected to his son being given the Covid 19 vaccine. As a consequence, his son’s mother got the son vaccinated in secret, without the father’s notice or knowledge, and without informing their teenage son of any of the risk of the vaccine.
  • After the father protested, the mother took him to court. The court also did not like Benshoof’s beliefs about Covid, the vaccine, and trans ideologies being taught his son, with guardians ad litem reporting him as a “transphobe” that should be denied contact with his son. The court ultimately agreed, and prohibited Benshoof from even contacting his son or responding to his son. When Benshoof responded to his son and told him he could live with him if he wanted when he was upset, the government charged Benshoof with the crime of stalking and harassment for talking to his son and for any attempts at communicating with his son’s mother about his son. How? Because dissident belief is now “abuse”. Dissident belief is now “stalking”. Dissident belief is now “harassment.”
  • This is why the Benshoof case is consequential beyond him. It’s the fundamental right to parent one’s own children without the government dictating what beliefs are ok to share or not share with your own children, what values they will be imparted with, and whether they have to be the guinea pig in a medical experiment.
  • I took on the case despite the difficult odds – a Seattle jury pool and judicial officials hostile to Benshoof and his beliefs and fully onboard the woke cultural revolution to impose on kids – because the family is still the haven in a heartless world, and we need more fathers to care for their sons, not fewer.
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Friday. February 21, 2025

Schedule

Past

  • Live w/ Duran
    placeholder

Future

  • Friday at 9ish pm eastern:  Betting w/ Barnes: SportsPicks Subscribers Exclusive AMA
  • Saturday Night at 9 pm eastern: Movie TBD
  • Sunday at 9 pm eastern: Viva & Barnes, Law for the People
  • Tuesday-Thursday February 25 to 27, Bourbon w/ Barnes at 9ish eastern

Book Recommendation: Lords of Poverty detailing the fraudulent way many “aid” NGOs work. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/53331.Lords_of_Poverty

Art of the Day: From one of the meme maker maestros, an elegant image of simply luxuries to end a hard day’s labor – a smooth glass with a big piece of ice draped in the inviting bourbon sharing the space with a lit cigar, against the backdrop of a whiskey cast with the name slipped in Viva/Barnes…very well done!

Wisdom of the Day: “I still remember, 40 years ago, when I was shackled and put in prison…Being an American citizen didn’t mean a thing then.” Fred Korematsu.

The Library: Top 5 Curated Articles of the Week

  1. A new disease: post Covid vaccination syndrome
  2. Language police
  3. Populist left protest
  4. Homeless rise
  5. Left uncovers why young people shifted                                                                                        

*Bonus: King of late night

Top 10 Cases TBD Sunday

  1. SCOTUS: Civil Rights
  2. SCOTUS: No Justice
  3. SCOTUS: Qui Tam Fraud
  4. SCOTUS: Prejudicial evidence
  5. Senseless in Seattle: Benshoof Case
  6. 1st Amendment Prosecutions
  7. Indentured servants
  8. Parental rights undermined
  9. Trans protections in prison
  10. Doge in court

*Bonus: High Seas power.

 

Closing Argument: Politicized Punishment

From my sentencing brief in the Senseless in Seattle case:

  • How much is enough? Mr. Benshoof has lost his car, lost his home, lost the right to contact his son, and lost his liberty for months in jail. He faces another trial on related charges. The Prosecution suggests an 81-year prison sentence, and formally now seeks an unprecedented, harsh, punitive six-year prison sentence with de facto termination of parental rights in a 5-year no contact order with his own son – for what?  A father texting his teenage son. The son often sought out the contact, and never complained about the contacts. Instead of the facts of this case, the government focuses on everything but this case, while ignoring the punishment that has already been imposed on the defendant. A just sentence conforming to Constitutional principles calls for a time served sentence, not a sentence longer than what some rapists get.  
  • Indeed, the entire case is predicated on a serious Constitutional offense – punishing a defendant for asserting his fundamental right to parent. A court cannot circumvent the Constitutional and statutory processes for terminating parental rights with “no contact” orders. The government’s sentence, if imposed, raises additional Constitutional questions, including terminating parental rights without due process of law and punishing defendants based on the individual interest of prosecutors and courts because the defendant brought legal complaints against them. 
  • Few fundamental rights are more important than the parental right to contact, control and custody of their minor children. Indeed, “[a] parent's right to control and to have the custody of his children is a fundamental civil right which may not be interfered with without the complete protection of due process safeguards.” In re Dependency of K.N.J., 171 Wash. 2d 568, 574, 257 P.3d 522, 526 (2011) (quoting Halsted v. Sallee, 31 Wash. App. 193, 195, 639 P.2d 877 (1982)). Mr. Benshoof, as a “natural parent, has a fundamental liberty interest in his custody and care of” his son. Id. (quoting In re Custody of C.C.M., 149 Wash.App. 184, 203, 202 P.3d 971 (2009)).  “Procedures used to terminate the relationship between parent and child must meet the requisites of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” Id. at 574 (quoting Lassiter v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 24–32 (1981)). Indeed, the Court of Appeals has previously noted that relocation and dependency proceedings are distinguishable from termination proceedings because they do not “sever all contact between the nonresidential parent and child.”  In re Marriage of Wehr, 165 Wash. App. 610, 615, 267 P.3d 1045, 1048 (2011). Here, however, the no-contact order at issue in the case, and the no contact order recommended by the prosecution would sever all contact between Mr. Benshoof and his son: without Due Process or the required statutory termination procedures.
  • None of these steps ever occurred: the prior court order stripped the Defendant of his fundamental rights without conforming to Constitutional or statutory process, and punishing him for asserting that right is as problematic as now seeking to create a new no contact order stripping him of those fundamental rights into the future. The Prosecution seeks to skip right over all of the Due Process protections built into a termination procedure and skip directly to the results of the termination: preventing Mr. Benshoof from seeing or contacting his son ever again. The Prosecution is essentially demanding a constructive termination of the parental relationship. Worse still, they demand this against the wishes of Mr. Benshoof’s son – who has the legal right to choose which parent he wishes to retain custody.
  • The government asks this court to commit the very abuses of power that led to standardizing sentencing in the first place: the need to treat similarly situated people similarly. The government’s punitive sentencing request invites yet another legal error: it demands punishment because the defendant has brought legal action against prosecutors and judges. This demand violates the defendant’s right to petition the government for redress of grievances, a Constitutional policy that prevents people seeking extra-legal remedies. While the government objects to the defendant constantly seeking out the courts for remedy, the government ignores his Constitutional right to do so, including the defendant challenging the service of process of the no-contact order at issue in this case, and challenged its constitutionality and jurisdictional authority as well. No one – until now – has sought to imprison someone for petitioning the court for redress of grievances, a First Amendment protected right. Aside from the Constitutional concerns, the government’s complaints about the defendant’s pro se litigation ignores that this case doesn’t concern those matters and that the defendant had already been punished. Mr. Benshoof has already been penalized with denial of the right to sue without advance court permission, dismissal of his petitions, denial of his complaints and appeals, and financial fines. By contrast, a time served sentence conforms to other comparable cases, Constitutional principles, and just sentencing.
  • It is apparent the legal authorities of the Seattle area dislike Benshoof’s pro se litigant and Covid policy protest past, but that is not the basis for imposing the harshest punishment ever imposed on a middle aged defendant with very little criminal history, who has already lost his ability to seek judicial redress without advance judicial permission, lost his car, lost his residence, and lost custody of his son, when that sentence will undermine confidence in the legal system and not be a truly just sentence. How much is enough? 

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals