- Art of the Day
- Board Post of Note
- Cultural Recommendation
- Economics
- Politics
- Law
- World
What I would write:
"Taking this vaccine violates my conscience for at least three reasons: first, the use of aborted fetuses in either the development or production of these vaccines, or both, when my religious beliefs require that I respect all human life, including fetal life, and not knowingly profit from harm to fetal life; second, the invasion of my body with foreign toxins when my religious beliefs require I treat my body as a temple, and not so knowingly desecrate it; and third, the coercion against informed consent of this vaccine when my religious beliefs require all medical treatment be conditioned upon informed consent. This is a matter of life and death, the very purpose for which I live my life, respect for all human beings and all human life in the world, a core matter of right and wrong, and essential to my very being. I cannot violate my conscience on such a core matter of my morals and the beliefs that guide me and govern me, formed by religious beliefs and as instructed by my religious tenets. I have never knowingly taken any vaccine, or any medicine, developed or produced with aborted fetal cells, that invaded my body with foreign toxins, or that were compelled against informed consent. The violation of informed consent is a matter of religious conscience; what the Nazi doctors did is morally wrong, spiritually offensive, and participating or partaking in such invasive, coerced medicine at any time offends the very core of my conscience. I cannot consciously disrespect human life, and the core of what makes us human and the dignity it requires we treat ourselves and our fellow human beings, even if it might medically or financially profit me to do so. Some things are not for sale; my conscience, formed by the core of religious tenets, is one of them."
John Solomon and Steven Richards of Just The News just put out a hit-piece on Kyle Seraphin in which they claim that Kyle recklessly discharged a firearm on a firing range that was declared “cold”, diagonal across the line of the instructor who was on the range allegedly repairing a target.
The article states that “Seraphin acknowledged to Just the News in an interview last year that he was "dicking around" when he fired his weapon at his supervisor's target at the range in 2022, but he insisted the incident should not have led to his suspension and termination and that he believes he was a victim of whistleblower retaliation.”
The article goes on to alleged that when asked why he fired on the instructor’s target during the incident, Seraphin “said it is sometimes what you do when you are “d*cking around” with friends on the range.”
Sounds pretty incriminating.
Until you hear what Kyle actually said, and how Just The News absolutely took the word “d*cking around” out of ...
I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.
Ask in replies and answering LIVE at 9ish eastern tonight....
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Barnes Library
I. INTRODUCTION
*Tickets available for August conference.
A. Art of the Week
B. Recommendation of the Week
C. Wisdom of the Week
D. Appearances
II. THE EVIDENCE
A. Barnes Library: Curated Weekly Articles
*Bonus: Beds for those without. https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/6500-volunteers-build-10k-beds-in-24-hours-in-north-carolina/
B. Best of the Board: Five Fun Posts of the Week
*Bonus: Beauty in black & white. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7895352/edinburgh-scotland
C. Homework: Cases of the Week for Sunday
*Bonus: Google settlement. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/google-settlement.pdf
** Bonus: Crazy JP Morgan suit. https://www.livemint.com/news/us-news/i-own-you-jpmorgan-executive-accused-of-drugging-abusing-male-junior-banker-in-lawsuit-key-allegations-11777545493334.html
***Bonus: Infowars. https://courthousenews.com/texas-appeals-court-pauses-the-onions-purchase-of-infowars/
D. Deep Dive: Iran Exit Ramps
*Bonus: Iran’s Lego pr. https://substack.com/@tritaparsi/note/c-251532814
III. CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution, Fifth Amendment & Discovery