Login Signup
VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Show me more content first

More of her please....!

00:03:40
Reply
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Show me more content first
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
VivaFrei@VivaFrei
1 hour ago
Cynthia West Full Interview

Here it is for your viewing pleasure.

00:43:40
Reply
VivaFrei@VivaFrei
2 hours ago
Summary of Cynthia West interview

I put together 6 highlights from the interview the Massie "accuser" gave.

I put "accuser" in quotes because it's ultimately not even clear what she's accusing Massie of.

He is mere a witness in her ethics complaint for retaliatory dismissal after working for 6 weeks for Spartz before getting fired.

The entire situation is a total cluster-hit-piece.

West says she had a relationship with Massie.

That they took a political trip to South Africa.

That he got her a job in DC.

That she got fired after 6 weeks.

That before gettin fired, she broke up with Massie.

She claims Massie offered her $5,000 a undeclared "cow money" to silence her.

That she has been offered $60,000 as a settlement but won't accept because it requires her to sign an NDA (absolutely standard for settlements).

I have been going at it with the usual suspects of TWS sycophants - Shawn Farash,. Will Chamberlain, Misfit Patriot - on X.

It is really discouraging to see people being so dishonest, so intellectually...

00:07:25
Reply
VivaFrei@VivaFrei
4 hours ago
Attack on Massie

Here's my breakdown

00:11:03
Reply
VivaFrei@VivaFrei
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
Reply
Robert Barnes@RobertBarnes
July 17, 2023
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Reply
Robert Barnes@RobertBarnes
July 04, 2022
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Reply
Robert Barnes@RobertBarnes
3 hours ago
LIVE w/ Shannon Joy
placeholder
Reply
Robert Barnes@RobertBarnes
6 hours ago
Questions for Bourbon with Barnes: Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Ask in replies and answering Live at 9ish eastern tonight.

Reply
Ankfray@Ankfray
43 seconds ago

Old clip but a good one. Look at Gorka's finger wag. This guy is as snobby as they come.

https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/upost/4645119/robertbarnes

Reply
Robert Barnes@RobertBarnes
May 12, 2026
post photo preview
The Daily Briefer Barnes Brief: Tuesday, May 12, 2026
  • Art of the Day 
Jazz. Soulful, spiritual, and celebratory at the same time as the musucial, mastroes of innovation and improvisation take us some place deep, real, and hopeful at the same time. Freedom distilled in a trumpet’s note, a pianist's key, a bassist’s chord, uncovered in the mind, expressesd through the soul, manifested into sound. A most American creation. 
 
  • Board Post of Note
 
  • Appearances
 
LIVE w/ Baris 
placeholder
 
LIVE w/ Daniel Davis 
 
  • Cultural Recommendation
A fun show with lessons for today.   https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12637874/
 
  • Economics
Currency future?
 
  • Politics
 
  • Law
Stack the court? Virginia as forewarning
 
  • World

 

Read full Article
Reply
Robert Barnes@RobertBarnes
May 08, 2026
post photo preview
The Weekend Barnes Brief: Friday, May 8, 2026
RobertBarnes
 
I. THE INTRODUCTION
 
A. Art of the Week
  • Venezia. The Atlantis-like ancient city with its bridges over canals, long boats mastered by the gondolier, the city whose balls made masquarade masks famous, where artisans of show-making spend a whole day to make a single show of artistic wonderment, a hidden restaurant in a corner alley uncovers the best Italian cuisine, and the city whispers of its centuries of stories from its cathedrals and water-hugging mansions of Casanova’s fame. 
 
B. Wisdom of the Week
  • You’re never out of the race. 
 
C. Cultural Recommendation of the Week
 
D. Appearances
 
 
 
II. THE EVIDENCE
 
A. Barnes Library: Weekly Curated Articles
 
 
B. Homework: Sunday Show Cases
  1. Malpractice. https://www.foxnews.com/us/iowa-woman-died-hernia-repair-nurses-dismissed-painful-post-surgery-symptoms-lawsuit
  2. Gates fake meat goes to court. https://texasagriculture.gov/News-Events/Article/10760/Opinion-Fake-Meat-Real-Trouble-Texas-Won-t-Bow-to-Billionaires-or-Bureaucrats
  3. DOJ sues Commierado for 2A.https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1439591/dl
  4. DOJ promises action against Big Ag. https://www.fooddive.com/news/beef-prices-trump-antitrust-doj-investigation/819331/
  5. Democrat raided. https://courthousenews.com/fbi-raids-democratic-virginia-state-senators-office/
  6. Insider trading indictment. https://www.justice.gov/d9/2026-05/usa_v._fejal_et_al_-_indictment.pdf
  7. Insider trading investigation https://seekingalpha.com/news/4588393-doj-probes-26b-in-war-linked-oil-trades---report
  8. Pay for play investigations https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-pardon-recipients-democrats-congressional-investigation-pay-to-play/
  9. EU: must allow welfare for migrants. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/kh-inps-cjeu-judgment.pdf
  10. DEI may lose, even in Twin Cities. https://courthousenews.com/minneapolis-public-schools-struggles-in-trump-suit-over-dei-policy/
  11. China spies on trial. https://courthousenews.com/feds-describe-global-network-of-chinese-police-stations-at-nyc-spy-trial-opening/
  12. Tiger’s DUI: Implied Consent Constitutionality Questions. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1401&context=elj
 
C. Deep Dive: The Economy
  1. Stock Market & Commodities: 
  2. AI Bubble & Capital Shift
  3. Housing
  4. Gold’s future. https://substack.com/inbox/post/196409142
  5. Inflation expectations. https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/inflation-expectations-jump-3-year-high-financial-pessimism-surges-ny-fed-survey
 
D.  Best of the Board
 
III. THE CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass -- The 30,000 Cap
 
  • Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 provides: “The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative.”  Interpretations clash: was this intended to impose a cap on the number of people a member of the House could represent, or the number of Representatives that could ever be in the House? Equally, who can enforce the rights of Section 2 as applied to Representatives?
  • Congress capped the number of representatives by the Permanent Apportionment Act of June 18, 1929, and has not changed it since. A 1941 federal law provided the means to assign seats after the Census. States contested this when it lost a seat after the 1990 census due to this cap.  The Supreme Court acknowledged this was not a question submitted exclusively to the Legislative branch as a “political question” beyond its jurisdiction to resolve. Thus, the question turns to the import and intent of the 30,000 rule — is it a cap on the number of representatives or is it a ceiling on the number of people represented?
  • The phraseology can be read either way — that the restaint is on the “number of” Representatives in a ratio to the population rather than the population size represented by the District; or that the ratio intends a cap on the number of people represented by each representative. Linguistically, the former argument holds more sway; historically and philosophically, the latter argument proffers more persuasive evidence.
  • If we see it as sufficiently ambigious to turn to the Constitutional record, we find that the ratio of the house to the population was intended to be close to the people at a size no more than 30,000 people, reflected in the papers of the Founding Fathers themselves.
  • Indeed, the controversy over this language almost sunk the Constitution itself, despite the supporters arguing in Federalist Papers throughout that this was a minimum of people to be represented not merely a cap on the number of representatives in the House. So much so, that the very first amendment ever proposed was to clarify this point: that the minimum number of representatives must be proportional to the population in a strict ratio. Due to an editing error as passed by Congress, the amendment never passed, though mostly it faded as the Founding generation protected the intended ratio in fact.
  • The best plaintiff to seek such a relief would likely be a state without representation due to the absence of this maximum number of people per representative, given the prior case-law on the subject, or, of course, Congress itself could remedy the problem all by itself. 
Read full Article
Reply
Robert Barnes@RobertBarnes
May 07, 2026
post photo preview
The Briefer Barnes Brief: Thursday, May 7, 2026
  • Art of the Day
Something majestic of a colorful Oriole in flight, the feeling of freedom in the outstretched wings to soar in the sky, beyond gravity and above the landed earth, ready to roam and reign while seeking a safe and strong landing place for a bit of a rest. 
 
  • Board Post of Note
 
 
  • Economics
Burry of Big Short fame: Yen trade unwinding impacts. https://substack.com/@michaeljburry/note/c-205215463
 
  • Politics
Tucker & Massie.
 
  • Law
 
  • World
Peruvian elections feature left-right battle. https://boz.substack.com/p/peru-presidential-election-polls
Read full Article
Reply
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals