VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

@RobertBarnes @VivaFrei et al.

Second: CIA involvement in Ukraine.

"## CIA Involvement in Ukraine: What's Documented vs. Contested

The question splits into three distinct layers, each with a different evidentiary status:


1. Pre-2014: Historical CIA Operations in Ukraine

Documented (declassified):

This is unambiguous but historical. It establishes a pattern but not a direct causal link to 2014.


2. 2013–2014: The "Coup" Question

What is documented:

| Event | Source | What it shows |

|---|---|---|

| Nuland–Pyatt phone call (late Jan/early Feb 2014) | [BBC transcript](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957); [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-ukraine-tape/leaked-audio-reveals-embarrassing-u-s-exchange-on-ukraine-eu-idUSBREA1601G20140207/); [PBS](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/leaked-u-s-phone-call-ukraine-draws-anger-russia-eu) | Nuland (State Dept) and Pyatt (Ambassador) discuss who should lead a post-Yanukovych government. Nuland: "I think Yats is the guy." They discuss excluding Klitschko from the government. Nuland: "Fuck the EU." |

| Nuland's $5 billion claim (Dec 2013, Kyiv) | [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-russia-deal-special-report-idUSBRE9BI0DZ20131219/) | Nuland publicly stated the US had spent ~$5B on democracy programs in Ukraine since 1991. |

| US-funded NGOs and civil society | [Factually.co fact-check](https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/evidence-us-orchestrated-coup-ukraine-2014-487d75) | USAID, NED, and Western foundations funded opposition groups, media, and civil society in the years before Maidan. |

| Nuland's own account | [Wikipedia (Nuland)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Nuland); 2019 Harvard Gazette interview | Nuland says she was "trying to de-escalate the Maidan conflict so that the Ukrainians could find a way back to association with Europe." She disputes the "coup" framing. |

What is NOT documented (in the public record):

The interpretive divide:

| Perspective | Argument |

|---|---|

| Ukrainian/Western mainstream | The Nuland call shows diplomatic engagement, not orchestration. Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians protested for their own reasons (corruption, authoritarianism, EU aspirations). The US expressed preferences but did not control the outcome. Nuland herself frames it as de-escalation. |

| Critics (Maté, Cato, WSWS, etc.) | The Nuland call, the $5B in democracy funding, the timing of US diplomatic pressure, and the rapid installation of a US-preferring government (Yatsenyuk as PM) demonstrate that the US was not a passive observer but an active agent of regime change — even if not a literal "CIA operation." [Cato](https://www.cato.org/commentary/washington-helped-trigger-ukraine-war): "The extent of the Obama administration's meddling in Ukraine's politics was breathtaking." [Consortium News](https://consortiumnews.com/2016/04/11/yats-is-no-longer-the-guy/): "the coup was clearly orchestrated by Nuland... she probably had the CIA's assistance." |

| Russian/Kremlin | Putin: the coup was "orchestrated with the backing of CIA, of course" ([TASS, 2024](https://tass.com/politics/1744103)). This is the most extreme version and is treated as propaganda by fact-checkers, but it rests on the same underlying facts (Nuland call, US funding) interpreted maximally. |

The honest summary: The US was deeply engaged — diplomatically, financially, and politically — in the events of 2013–2014. The Nuland call is real and unambiguous in its content. Whether that constitutes "orchestration of a coup" or "active diplomatic engagement in a domestic political crisis" is the interpretive question, and reasonable people disagree. What is not established in the public record is a CIA-run covert operation that staged the protests.


3. Post-2014: The Documented CIA–Ukraine Intelligence Partnership

This is where the evidence is overwhelming and self-acknowledged by US officials:

| Event | Source |

|---|---|

| Feb 2014: New SBU head Nalyvaichenko proposes "three-way partnership" with CIA and MI6 | [Responsible Statecraft](https://responsiblestatecraft.org/cia-ukraine-russia/) |

| 2014–2015: CIA helps rebuild Ukraine's HUR (Main Directorate of Intelligence) from the ground up; funds training, equipment, facilities | [ABC News (Jan 2025)](https://abcnews.com/International/cia-helped-rebuild-ukraine-intelligence-russia-invasion/story?id=116909361) |

| ~2015: CIA supports creation of SBU's Fifth Directorate (counterintelligence + special ops); conducts assassinations and covert actions against pro-Russian forces in Donbas | [Forbes (Jun 2026)](https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkirichenko/2026/06/22/how-the-cia-helped-build-ukraines-intelligence-advantage/); [WSWS](https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/02/26/nrdz-f26.html) |

| 2016: CIA begins training Unit 2245 — elite Ukrainian commando force that captures Russian drones/comms gear for reverse-engineering | [NYT (Feb 2024)](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/25/world/europe/cia-ukraine-intelligence-russia-war.html) |

| 2016–2022: CIA helps build 12 secret forward-operating bases along the Russian border; "Operation Goldfish" trains Ukrainian agents for deep-cover and guerrilla operations inside Russia | [NYT (Feb 2024)](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/25/world/europe/cia-ukraine-intelligence-russia-war.html); [ABC News](https://abcnews.com/International/cia-helped-rebuild-ukraine-intelligence-russia-invasion/story?id=116909361); [Strategic Page](https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htsf/articles/20240309.aspx) |

| Feb 2022 (invasion): CIA officers are the only Americans not evacuated from Ukraine; they remain in western Ukraine relaying real-time intelligence on Russian strike plans | [NYT (Feb 2024)](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/25/world/europe/cia-ukraine-intelligence-russia-war.html) |

| 2022–present: CIA officers deployed to Ukrainian bases; review target lists for Ukrainian strikes on Russian territory; assist in planning strikes on Russian energy infrastructure | [NYT (Feb 2024)](https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/25/world/europe/cia-ukraine-intelligence-russia-war.html); [Forbes (Jun 2026)](https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidkirichenko/2026/06/22/how-the-cia-helped-build-ukraines-intelligence-advantage/) |

| Oct 2023: Washington Post documents CIA-tied Ukrainian operatives conducting a covert bombing operation inside Russia (bomb hidden in a cat carrier) | [Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/10/23/ukraine-cia-shadow-war-russia/) |

Key point: The CIA's post-2014 role is not a "coup" narrative — it is a self-acknowledged, decade-long intelligence partnership that the US government has never denied. The NYT, ABC, Washington Post, and Forbes have all reported on it with sourcing from current and former US officials. The question is not whether the CIA is involved (it is, extensively) but what that involvement means for the "unprovoked war" narrative.


The Core Tension

The "CIA coup" claim and the "CIA intelligence partnership" are two different claims that get conflated:

  • Claim A: "The CIA orchestrated the 2014 removal of Yanukovych." → Not established in the public record. The Nuland call shows US diplomatic engagement, not CIA operational control. The protests had massive domestic drivers.

  • Claim B: "The CIA has been deeply involved in Ukraine's security and intelligence architecture since 2014, training forces, building bases, and conducting joint operations against Russia." → Thoroughly documented by US media with US government sources.

Critics (Maté, Cato, WSWS, etc.) argue that Claim B, taken seriously, undermines the "unprovoked war" framing: if the US has been running a covert intelligence operation inside Ukraine for a decade, targeting Russian territory, then Russia's security concerns were not entirely irrational. The US mainstream response is that intelligence cooperation with a sovereign ally is standard practice and does not constitute "provocation."

Both sides are arguing from the same documented facts. The disagreement is over interpretation."

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
BOMBSHELL EVIDENCE Blows Jan 6 Pipe Bomber Story WIDE OPEN — FBI Got the Wrong Guy?

Here's the clip. Share it AWAY!!!

00:19:05
October 18, 2026
Manny and Winnie

It’s pure love.

Or attempted cannibalism.

The jury is still out…

00:00:51
October 17, 2026
GSP podcast

This is a very interesting exchange between George St-Pierre and a “PhD sex therapist”.

It illustrates a lot of the psychological issues we are witnessing today.

GSP asks (paraphrasing slightly): Does engaging in gay sex make you gay?

PhD: Not necessarily, it depends on how you “identify”.

This highlights the cultural schizophrenia of our time - people don’t want to be defined by what they actually do. They want to be defined by how they perceive themselves.

“I’m not what I do, rather what I identify as”.

With very few exceptions, willingly engaging in gay sex makes you gay. Definitionally.

Much like stealing makes you a thief.

Much like giving to the poor makes you charitable.

It’s only when people are coerced to do things that one can argue it doesn’t define who they are.

But this highlights the fact that people want to live with a delusion of identity - that they are not what they are or do, they are how they identify.

It really allows for any form of conduct.

Podcast here ...

00:01:54
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Board Poll: Sunday Topics

Pick your top topic, if any, and add your own topic, comment or question in the replies below as the Producer's Show Notes for the Sunday Show.

Interview w/ Stanislav
Interview w/ Judge Napolitano
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Friday, October 16, 2026
I. THE INTRODUCTION
 

Special Notices

 
A. Art of the Day 
  • The old fold-down wooden desk, handcrafted by deliberate care, the little boxes to store letters and notes, the shelf above to carry papers and books, the firm backed, four quared chair with comforting armrests, above the wooden floor and near the open window, the neighboring painting on the wall, that could sit today just as it had centuries ago, taking the work of the mind back to the place our forefathers enjoyed the same. 
 
B. Wisdom of the Day
  • America is “the champion and vindicator only of her own”, a perfect articulation of America First.  John Quincy Adams. 

C. Appearances & Publications
 
 
D. Daily Picks
 
E. *Bonus: Board Post of the Day
 
II. THE EVIDENCE: BARNES LIBRARY
 
A. Food & Medicine
 
B. Economics
 
C. Politics
 
D. Geopolitics
 
E. Law
 
III. HOMEWORK: Ten Top Cases for Sunday Show
 
  1. Ex-agents sue Patel. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/fbi-agents-sue-patel-over-mar-a-lao-tied-firings.pdf
  2. Court allows non-resident voting. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/rnc-v-evnen-opinion-nebraska-supreme-court.pdf
  3. Social media limits approved. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/netchoice-v-attny-gen-georgia-eleventh-circuit.pdf
  4. California tries to stop ICE arrests. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/california-vs-ice-complaint.pdf
  5. Trans bathrooms & federal funds. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/fairfax-county-school-board-v-mcmahon-ruling.pdf
  6. Court allows sanctuary for illegals in NYC. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/sanctuary-city-dismissed-nyc-eastern-district-new-york.pdf
  7. Looted paintings. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/norton-simon-vs-jewish-federation-complaint.pdf
  8. Court demands lottery for immigrants. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/redeagle-v-rubio-ruling-101426.pdf
  9. California can’t regulate Feds. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/ninth-ciruit-no-vigilantes-act.pdf
  10. Scotus: Privacy suit. https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/10/court-appears-likely-to-allow-internet-suit-based-on-decades-old-video-privacy-law-to-go-forward/
 
IV. CLOSING ARGUMENT: Classes in the Constitution, Reminders from our Founding Fathers on Foreign Entanglements
 
Two founding documents of the founding generation’s approach to foreign entanglments consist of President Washington’s Farewell Address and John Quincy Adams July 4th speech to the House of Representatives in 1821. 
 
Cousin Adams address “on foreign policy” summarized America’s approach to foreign conflicts, by starting with America’s founding rejection of the politics of imperial empire, denouncing Britian’s “portentious system of despotism” with “oppressions of power” governed bby an appetite for “conquest” against the “claims of right” of self-governance. In such an imperial worldview “man had no rights”, where “neither the body nore the soul of the individual was his own” subjecting the people to the “impentarable gloom of this intellectual darkness, and the deep degradation of this servitude” which defined the “British nation” under its imperial mask. These imperial ambitions inflected “the delusions of all Europe” degrading the societies occupied by an intellectually and morally robust people. It was in rejection of these very ideas of empire and presumptions of imperial rule that guided the American revolution. 
 
This animating spirit requires America “respect the indpendence of other nations”, must “abstain from interference in the concerns of others, even when the conflict has been for principes to which America clings.” America “well knows that by enlisting under other banners than her own, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrictation, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy and ambition, which the assume the colors and usrup the standard of freedom” changing her “from liberty to force” creating the hated British “Imperial Diadem, flashing in falkse and tarnished lustre the murky radiance of dominion and power” to become the “distatress of the world” and no longer “the ruler of her own Revolutartionary spirit.” 
 
America is “the champion and vindicator only of her own”, a perfect articulation of America First.  That is why America “does not go aborad searching for monsters to destroy.” America’s “glory is not dominion, but liberty.” 
 
Washington warned in his founding Farewell Address: “the nation which indulges towards another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to it animosity or to its affection.” Washington discouraged any political connections beyond economic trade with nations of the world due to the likely subsuming of a foreign nation’s cause as our own, their antipathies or adversaries as our own, substituting a foreign nation for our own in decision making. Thus the “true policy” of our founders was “to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world.” 
 
These principles — avoiding the trap of imperial logic, respecting each nation’s own sovereign path, and escaping the entanglements of foreign conflicts — animated the founders. Only when we abandon these precepts and principles do we lose our way. The first promoters of America First were our founders themselves. 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Friday, October 2, 2026
. THE INTRODUCTION
 

Special Notices

 
A. Art of the Day 
  • Another artistic expression of my own self-impression, the contemplative thought of looking out into the world through the oversized window amidst the shadows of dark and light, in between them both, uncovering and discovering along the way, a singular, solo figure in the space empty of objects but full of opportunities, sparse in materials but rich in ideas, waiting to be realized. 
 
B. Wisdom of the Day
  • "He who sacrifices a right for a perceived benefit trades a mountain for a mirage.” Political proverb. 

C. Appearances & Publications
 
 
D. Daily Picks
 
E. *Bonus: Board Post of the Day
 
II. THE EVIDENCE: BARNES LIBRARY
 
A. Food & Medicine
 
B. Economics
 
C. Politics
 
D. Geopolitics
 
E. Law

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Thursday, October 1, 2026
THE INTRODUCTION
 

Special Notices

 
A. Art of the Day 
  • The early morning hue, the fog of the dawn, the invitation of a new day, the beckoning of a promising journey, a simple man with a suitcase awaiting the train, to someplace, somewhere, maybe escaping, maybe seeking, the attractive allure of a new day. 
 
B. Wisdom of the Day
  • "A new species would bless me as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me.” Viktor Frankenstein. 

C. Appearances & Publications
 
 
D. Daily Picks
 
E. *Bonus: Board Post of Note
 
II. THE EVIDENCE: BARNES LIBRARY
 
A. Health
 
B. Economics
  • The AI/Orivate credit bubble. 
 
C. Politics
 
D. Geopolitics
 
E. Law

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals