VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Little Rock Township is one of the first townships in the U.S. to require a public vote on data centers.
🍿WATCH THE FULL MEETING BELOW...
Liberty does not sustain itself, it relies on the people to stay engaged, revisit the principles of self government, and take responsibility for its execution. Rights carry an inherent duty to hold institutions accountable, and to act as the ultimate check on power.
On May 5, 2026, the People of Little Rock Township fulfilled this duty. They did not wait for the government to fall into maladministration before taking action.
Instead, they acted preemptively to protect the community’s public good, and common benefit.
By lawfully organizing a special meeting as "We The People," they presented, debated, and unanimously voted on a resolution, and ordinance to assert direct local authority over commercial data center development.
The Power of the Township
A unique feature of the Township is that it allows for direct control by the residents. The people do not need to wait for permission from elected officials to govern. It is the people themselves, not the board, who run the meeting, and exercise authority.
This structure ensures that government remains quickly responsive to the will of the community.
In this instance, the meeting was conducted by the residents through a lawful process, with Joe McElroy appointed as moderator.
Grounded in Fundamental Law
The measure establishes that any future data center proposals must undergo full transparency, and public review, ultimately requiring approval by township voters in a binding election.
This action is rooted in the following foundations:
The Illinois Constitution: Specifically Article I, Section 1, which declares that all men have inherent and inalienable rights and that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. The Preamble further underscores the purpose of the state is to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of the people.
The U.S. Constitution: The guarantee that government remains accountable to the governed, as supported by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, which reserve powers to the states and the people respectively.
The Declaration of Independence: This action rests on the moral foundation that our rights are unalienable and derived from a higher, divine authority, rather than granted by the state.
Protecting the Common Benefit
By asserting this authority, the people are ensuring that commerce, and development serve the common benefit.
This preemptive step is designed to protect the environment, respect private property rights, and preserve the character of the community against potential infrastructure strain, loss of property value, and environmental impact.
Their action comes amid growing local concern as data center expansion is proposed across Kendall County.
As the founding fathers intended, the stability of the Republic depends on adhering to these original principles, rather than shifting toward personal opinions, or administrative convenience.
The People of Little Rock Township have reaffirmed that the root of all political power resides in them.
Public Notice
The full Resolution and Ordinance are available on the Little Rock Township website and through the Township Clerk.
Dated: May 5, 2026
Lucy Rechsteiner,
Little Rock Township Clerk
youtube.com/watch?v=di5-rE8lb_4&fbclid=IwY2xjawRphKZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBicmlkETFyUlVQN0tvOG5MMHMyeXExc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHiJc2ou5vPJDubO97RONF1HyJmxE0UXwcSyV8JZ2CxkW_QEXt6fBx2h129cU_aem__tDtJ88eomqjffJjT80Ryg

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
L Louise Lucas

FBI Raid On "Top Virginia State Senator" Reveals Utter Democrat Hypocrisy!

00:07:38
Hit piece on Kyle Seraphin

John Solomon and Steven Richards of Just The News just put out a hit-piece on Kyle Seraphin in which they claim that Kyle recklessly discharged a firearm on a firing range that was declared “cold”, diagonal across the line of the instructor who was on the range allegedly repairing a target.

The article states that “Seraphin acknowledged to Just the News in an interview last year that he was "dicking around" when he fired his weapon at his supervisor's target at the range in 2022, but he insisted the incident should not have led to his suspension and termination and that he believes he was a victim of whistleblower retaliation.”

The article goes on to alleged that when asked why he fired on the instructor’s target during the incident, Seraphin “said it is sometimes what you do when you are “d*cking around” with friends on the range.”

Sounds pretty incriminating.

Until you hear what Kyle actually said, and how Just The News absolutely took the word “d*cking around” out of ...

00:01:35
Clip from yesterday

Crazed Woman Tries to RUN OVER Kid on E-Bike - Gets Released WITH NO BAIL!

00:08:00
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Weekend Debate: Term Limits

Share your thoughts below.

Pros: Limit the permanent political class growing into an aristocracy of elites whose incumbency status and power-holding position affords them an institutional edge over competitors, encouraging a gerontocracy of lifelong politicians, disconnected from the real world of everyday economics and more likely to be embedded into a parasitic government-driven, power-access oriented system that empowers corrupt elites at the expense of the people.

Cons: In contemporary government, the real consequence of term-limiting the Thomas Massies of the world is to empower the permanent state, empowering bureaucracy over democracy, in lobbyists, career staffers, and the ever-expanding bureaucratic state, like a show of Yes Minister, married to the corrupting effect of donor class gatekeeping in the real world of modern elections driven by television expense ever consuming larger and larger shares of campaign exploding budgets to reach the ever growing number of voters they...

Questions for Bourbon w/ Barnes: Thursday, May 7, 2026

Ask in replies and answering LIVE at 9ish eastern tonight....

Questions for Bourbon with Barnes: Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Ask in replies and answering Live at 9ish eastern tonight.

post photo preview
The Weekend Barnes Brief: Friday, May 8, 2026
 
I. THE INTRODUCTION
 
A. Art of the Week
  • Venezia. The Atlantis-like ancient city with its bridges over canals, long boats mastered by the gondolier, the city whose balls made masquarade masks famous, where artisans of show-making spend a whole day to make a single show of artistic wonderment, a hidden restaurant in a corner alley uncovers the best Italian cuisine, and the city whispers of its centuries of stories from its cathedrals and water-hugging mansions of Casanova’s fame. 
 
B. Wisdom of the Week
  • You’re never out of the race. 
 
C. Cultural Recommendation of the Week
 
D. Appearances
 
 
 
II. THE EVIDENCE
 
A. Barnes Library: Weekly Curated Articles
 
B. Homework: Sunday Show Cases
  1. Malpractice. https://www.foxnews.com/us/iowa-woman-died-hernia-repair-nurses-dismissed-painful-post-surgery-symptoms-lawsuit
  2. Gates fake meat goes to court. https://texasagriculture.gov/News-Events/Article/10760/Opinion-Fake-Meat-Real-Trouble-Texas-Won-t-Bow-to-Billionaires-or-Bureaucrats
  3. DOJ sues Commierado for 2A.https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1439591/dl
  4. DOJ promises action against Big Ag. https://www.fooddive.com/news/beef-prices-trump-antitrust-doj-investigation/819331/
  5. Democrat raided. https://courthousenews.com/fbi-raids-democratic-virginia-state-senators-office/
  6. Insider trading indictment. https://www.justice.gov/d9/2026-05/usa_v._fejal_et_al_-_indictment.pdf
  7. Insider trading investigation https://seekingalpha.com/news/4588393-doj-probes-26b-in-war-linked-oil-trades---report
  8. Pay for play investigations https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-pardon-recipients-democrats-congressional-investigation-pay-to-play/
  9. EU: must allow welfare for migrants. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/kh-inps-cjeu-judgment.pdf
  10. DEI may lose, even in Twin Cities. https://courthousenews.com/minneapolis-public-schools-struggles-in-trump-suit-over-dei-policy/
  11. China spies on trial. https://courthousenews.com/feds-describe-global-network-of-chinese-police-stations-at-nyc-spy-trial-opening/
  12. Tiger’s DUI: Implied Consent Constitutionality Questions. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1401&context=elj
 
C. Deep Dive: The Economy
  1. Stock Market & Commodities: 
  2. AI Bubble & Capital Shift
  3. Housing
  4. Gold’s future. https://substack.com/inbox/post/196409142
  5. Inflation expectations. https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/inflation-expectations-jump-3-year-high-financial-pessimism-surges-ny-fed-survey
 
D.  Best of the Board
 
III. THE CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass -- The 30,000 Cap
 
  • Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 provides: “The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative.”  Interpretations clash: was this intended to impose a cap on the number of people a member of the House could represent, or the number of Representatives that could ever be in the House? Equally, who can enforce the rights of Section 2 as applied to Representatives?
  • Congress capped the number of representatives by the Permanent Apportionment Act of June 18, 1929, and has not changed it since. A 1941 federal law provided the means to assign seats after the Census. States contested this when it lost a seat after the 1990 census due to this cap.  The Supreme Court acknowledged this was not a question submitted exclusively to the Legislative branch as a “political question” beyond its jurisdiction to resolve. Thus, the question turns to the import and intent of the 30,000 rule — is it a cap on the number of representatives or is it a ceiling on the number of people represented?
  • The phraseology can be read either way — that the restaint is on the “number of” Representatives in a ratio to the population rather than the population size represented by the District; or that the ratio intends a cap on the number of people represented by each representative. Linguistically, the former argument holds more sway; historically and philosophically, the latter argument proffers more persuasive evidence.
  • If we see it as sufficiently ambigious to turn to the Constitutional record, we find that the ratio of the house to the population was intended to be close to the people at a size no more than 30,000 people, reflected in the papers of the Founding Fathers themselves.
  • Indeed, the controversy over this language almost sunk the Constitution itself, despite the supporters arguing in Federalist Papers throughout that this was a minimum of people to be represented not merely a cap on the number of representatives in the House. So much so, that the very first amendment ever proposed was to clarify this point: that the minimum number of representatives must be proportional to the population in a strict ratio. Due to an editing error as passed by Congress, the amendment never passed, though mostly it faded as the Founding generation protected the intended ratio in fact.
  • The best plaintiff to seek such a relif would likely be a state without representation due to the absence of this maximum number of people per representative, given the prior case-law on the subject, or, of course, Congress itself could remedy the problem all by itself. 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Briefer Barnes Brief: Thursday, May 7, 2026
  • Art of the Day
Something majestic of a colorful Oriole in flight, the feeling of freedom in the outstretched wings to soar in the sky, beyond gravity and above the landed earth, ready to roam and reign while seeking a safe and strong landing place for a bit of a rest. 
 
  • Board Post of Note
 
 
  • Economics
Burry of Big Short fame: Yen trade unwinding impacts. https://substack.com/@michaeljburry/note/c-205215463
 
  • Politics
Tucker & Massie.
 
  • Law
 
  • World
Peruvian elections feature left-right battle. https://boz.substack.com/p/peru-presidential-election-polls
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Briefer Barnes Brief: Wednesday, May 6, 2026

I. INTRODUCTION

  • A.  Art of the Day: Best way to start a day: early morning coffee. Maybe on a back porch. Maybe at a kitchen table. Maybe in a friendly diner. Maybe at a corner caffe. Maybe in a local coffee house. A tradition commenced in the hills of Yemen, it traversed the Islamic world until it reached Europe, where it turn the holy inspirational drink in the Turkish caves to the everyday place of chatter in the newborn cafes of Europe in the 17th century. Be that as it may, for many still, it signals the start of the day in a good way. 
  • B.  Board Post of the Day: https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7905561/title
II. THE EVIDENCE 

A.  Barnes Library

  1. Economy: Snider on gas prices.
  2. Culture: World Cup interest dims. https://www.forbes.com/sites/suzannerowankelleher/2026/05/05/hotels-world-cup-non-event-so-far/
  3. Politics: Massie mini-documentary.
  4. Law: Abortion pill at SCOTUS. https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/05/abortion-pill-dispute-returns-to-supreme-court/
  5. Geopolitics: Larry Johnson on Trump’s mixed signals. https://sonar21.com/ball-of-confusion-trumps-mixed-signals-on-iran/
*Bonus: Animated Fed history told by some friends of mine years ago that they gave away for free. 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals