VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

The Bloody Midterms of ‘26 (repost from original on People’s Pundit Locals)

This mid term is going to be painful but a lesson MUST be taught. If I were an Ohioan I would vote blue for governor. I’ll explain the logic and position for those who think it’s crazy.

We have to enforce our politics and position and make it clear that the GOP position is untenable. The candidates they put forward and push through primaries against the base are no longer winnable. They give us results and who we want or they get nothing. The electability argument that the RINO neocons have always used is now on the other foot. Vivek can win the primary in Ohio but Putsch voters will not vote for him in the general and there are more people that did not vote in the primary who will not show up for him in the general. They need US to win and we are the spoke in their wheel. Sorry but that candidate isn’t America First he’s not electable. We can demonstrate that without us they will simply get stomped. It doesn’t matter how many donors and Jewish millionaires like Miriam Adelson support you. Additionally the donors they have only donate for access and once it becomes clear that they aren’t viable and they know they won’t get access because they won’t be in office many donors will dry up.

Votes are our only lever:

Americans have no lobby to support their interests. The voting groups that makeup a winning coalition, millennial and gen X men and middle and working class families, are also totally broke having been squeezed by inflation and affordability crisis. Grassroots really has no money to donate they are struggling to pay grocery and gas prices and make car payments. Owning a home is just something they joke about now. They don’t have the monetary juice to squeeze for campaigns to support what they would actually vote for. The ONLY thing they have to give or keep is their vote. This has been something I have talked about for awhile.

The GOP(e) has relied for so long on how the left will actively harm their bases interests and what they care about in order to argue that even though the GOP won’t help you and will even hurt you a little bit or a lot the other side would do worse.

So yes Democrats will break laws and violate your rights when in office and when we are in office we do nothing. Countdown to your next persecution and further degradation. Never any reversals only instantiation of leftist victories and changes. Think of Obamacare, lawfare, politically captured and weaponized agencies, anti-white persecution and DEI policies. The only victories the right has won that are meaningful or lasting haven’t come through legislative or executive action but Supreme Court decisions that reversed abortion, preserved gun rights, or slightly curtailed the administrative state. Everything executive has been ephemeral and can and will be immediately reversed with a Democrat president and the legislature is totally hostile to their voters and bases desires and platform.

Now things have reached such a point because of the fecklessness and controlled opposition of American Conservatism since the latter half of the 20th century that not actively warring and pushing their agenda IS actively harming Americans and the argument of the other side is even worse hits hardened hearts. It’s not good enough to be bad but not AS bad as the left. There’s not enough to differentiate GOP from leftists. All their posturing and speaking out is just theatre. It’s professional wrestling Kayfabe.

Legitimate Danger:

The danger ahead is that Democrats will structurally change the country and centralize their power and politically neuter Americans to the point they no longer have a peaceful means to change things politically via court packing, constitutional amendments, judicial tyranny, and amnesty for foreigners as well as reopening floodgates for millions more to come in. However all of that will happen regardless if there isn’t genuine opposition and leaders willing to fight fire with fire and wield power to accomplish the political agenda of America First voters.

GOP has long relied on control of party apparatus and ability to pick primary winners in this prisoners dilemma they setup with the left who they philosophically are more aligned with on issues America First platform cares about to force people they don’t represent to vote for them.

As such I will vote Democrat in a general over any GOP candidate like my own Senator Lankford in Oklahoma.

It’s purely a game theory power politics calculation based on logic. It’s fine for others to disagree but my position is a growing one and has to be wrestled with and the fact that it does is exactly the point of having it. If my group is big enough to ensure that you don’t get elected without us or to ensure you lose if you don’t keep faith or actively suborn my politics after getting elected then that is enough to change the dynamics.

It’s simple: We get what we want or you get NOTHING, come what may. If we have to burn it down we will. Act accordingly.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
L Louise Lucas

FBI Raid On "Top Virginia State Senator" Reveals Utter Democrat Hypocrisy!

00:07:38
Hit piece on Kyle Seraphin

John Solomon and Steven Richards of Just The News just put out a hit-piece on Kyle Seraphin in which they claim that Kyle recklessly discharged a firearm on a firing range that was declared “cold”, diagonal across the line of the instructor who was on the range allegedly repairing a target.

The article states that “Seraphin acknowledged to Just the News in an interview last year that he was "dicking around" when he fired his weapon at his supervisor's target at the range in 2022, but he insisted the incident should not have led to his suspension and termination and that he believes he was a victim of whistleblower retaliation.”

The article goes on to alleged that when asked why he fired on the instructor’s target during the incident, Seraphin “said it is sometimes what you do when you are “d*cking around” with friends on the range.”

Sounds pretty incriminating.

Until you hear what Kyle actually said, and how Just The News absolutely took the word “d*cking around” out of ...

00:01:35
Clip from yesterday

Crazed Woman Tries to RUN OVER Kid on E-Bike - Gets Released WITH NO BAIL!

00:08:00
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Weekend Debate: Term Limits

Share your thoughts below.

Pros: Limit the permanent political class growing into an aristocracy of elites whose incumbency status and power-holding position affords them an institutional edge over competitors, encouraging a gerontocracy of lifelong politicians, disconnected from the real world of everyday economics and more likely to be embedded into a parasitic government-driven, power-access oriented system that empowers corrupt elites at the expense of the people.

Cons: In contemporary government, the real consequence of term-limiting the Thomas Massies of the world is to empower the permanent state, empowering bureaucracy over democracy, in lobbyists, career staffers, and the ever-expanding bureaucratic state, like a show of Yes Minister, married to the corrupting effect of donor class gatekeeping in the real world of modern elections driven by television expense ever consuming larger and larger shares of campaign exploding budgets to reach the ever growing number of voters they...

Questions for Bourbon w/ Barnes: Thursday, May 7, 2026

Ask in replies and answering LIVE at 9ish eastern tonight....

Questions for Bourbon with Barnes: Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Ask in replies and answering Live at 9ish eastern tonight.

post photo preview
The Weekend Barnes Brief: Friday, May 8, 2026
 
I. THE INTRODUCTION
 
A. Art of the Week
  • Venezia. The Atlantis-like ancient city with its bridges over canals, long boats mastered by the gondolier, the city whose balls made masquarade masks famous, where artisans of show-making spend a whole day to make a single show of artistic wonderment, a hidden restaurant in a corner alley uncovers the best Italian cuisine, and the city whispers of its centuries of stories from its cathedrals and water-hugging mansions of Casanova’s fame. 
 
B. Wisdom of the Week
  • You’re never out of the race. 
 
C. Cultural Recommendation of the Week
 
D. Appearances
 
 
 
II. THE EVIDENCE
 
A. Barnes Library: Weekly Curated Articles
 
B. Homework: Sunday Show Cases
  1. Malpractice. https://www.foxnews.com/us/iowa-woman-died-hernia-repair-nurses-dismissed-painful-post-surgery-symptoms-lawsuit
  2. Gates fake meat goes to court. https://texasagriculture.gov/News-Events/Article/10760/Opinion-Fake-Meat-Real-Trouble-Texas-Won-t-Bow-to-Billionaires-or-Bureaucrats
  3. DOJ sues Commierado for 2A.https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1439591/dl
  4. DOJ promises action against Big Ag. https://www.fooddive.com/news/beef-prices-trump-antitrust-doj-investigation/819331/
  5. Democrat raided. https://courthousenews.com/fbi-raids-democratic-virginia-state-senators-office/
  6. Insider trading indictment. https://www.justice.gov/d9/2026-05/usa_v._fejal_et_al_-_indictment.pdf
  7. Insider trading investigation https://seekingalpha.com/news/4588393-doj-probes-26b-in-war-linked-oil-trades---report
  8. Pay for play investigations https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-pardon-recipients-democrats-congressional-investigation-pay-to-play/
  9. EU: must allow welfare for migrants. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/kh-inps-cjeu-judgment.pdf
  10. DEI may lose, even in Twin Cities. https://courthousenews.com/minneapolis-public-schools-struggles-in-trump-suit-over-dei-policy/
  11. China spies on trial. https://courthousenews.com/feds-describe-global-network-of-chinese-police-stations-at-nyc-spy-trial-opening/
  12. Tiger’s DUI: Implied Consent Constitutionality Questions. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1401&context=elj
 
C. Deep Dive: The Economy
  1. Stock Market & Commodities: 
  2. AI Bubble & Capital Shift
  3. Housing
  4. Gold’s future. https://substack.com/inbox/post/196409142
  5. Inflation expectations. https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/inflation-expectations-jump-3-year-high-financial-pessimism-surges-ny-fed-survey
 
D.  Best of the Board
 
III. THE CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass -- The 30,000 Cap
 
  • Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 provides: “The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative.”  Interpretations clash: was this intended to impose a cap on the number of people a member of the House could represent, or the number of Representatives that could ever be in the House? Equally, who can enforce the rights of Section 2 as applied to Representatives?
  • Congress capped the number of representatives by the Permanent Apportionment Act of June 18, 1929, and has not changed it since. A 1941 federal law provided the means to assign seats after the Census. States contested this when it lost a seat after the 1990 census due to this cap.  The Supreme Court acknowledged this was not a question submitted exclusively to the Legislative branch as a “political question” beyond its jurisdiction to resolve. Thus, the question turns to the import and intent of the 30,000 rule — is it a cap on the number of representatives or is it a ceiling on the number of people represented?
  • The phraseology can be read either way — that the restaint is on the “number of” Representatives in a ratio to the population rather than the population size represented by the District; or that the ratio intends a cap on the number of people represented by each representative. Linguistically, the former argument holds more sway; historically and philosophically, the latter argument proffers more persuasive evidence.
  • If we see it as sufficiently ambigious to turn to the Constitutional record, we find that the ratio of the house to the population was intended to be close to the people at a size no more than 30,000 people, reflected in the papers of the Founding Fathers themselves.
  • Indeed, the controversy over this language almost sunk the Constitution itself, despite the supporters arguing in Federalist Papers throughout that this was a minimum of people to be represented not merely a cap on the number of representatives in the House. So much so, that the very first amendment ever proposed was to clarify this point: that the minimum number of representatives must be proportional to the population in a strict ratio. Due to an editing error as passed by Congress, the amendment never passed, though mostly it faded as the Founding generation protected the intended ratio in fact.
  • The best plaintiff to seek such a relif would likely be a state without representation due to the absence of this maximum number of people per representative, given the prior case-law on the subject, or, of course, Congress itself could remedy the problem all by itself. 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Briefer Barnes Brief: Thursday, May 7, 2026
  • Art of the Day
Something majestic of a colorful Oriole in flight, the feeling of freedom in the outstretched wings to soar in the sky, beyond gravity and above the landed earth, ready to roam and reign while seeking a safe and strong landing place for a bit of a rest. 
 
  • Board Post of Note
 
 
  • Economics
Burry of Big Short fame: Yen trade unwinding impacts. https://substack.com/@michaeljburry/note/c-205215463
 
  • Politics
Tucker & Massie.
 
  • Law
 
  • World
Peruvian elections feature left-right battle. https://boz.substack.com/p/peru-presidential-election-polls
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Briefer Barnes Brief: Wednesday, May 6, 2026

I. INTRODUCTION

  • A.  Art of the Day: Best way to start a day: early morning coffee. Maybe on a back porch. Maybe at a kitchen table. Maybe in a friendly diner. Maybe at a corner caffe. Maybe in a local coffee house. A tradition commenced in the hills of Yemen, it traversed the Islamic world until it reached Europe, where it turn the holy inspirational drink in the Turkish caves to the everyday place of chatter in the newborn cafes of Europe in the 17th century. Be that as it may, for many still, it signals the start of the day in a good way. 
  • B.  Board Post of the Day: https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7905561/title
II. THE EVIDENCE 

A.  Barnes Library

  1. Economy: Snider on gas prices.
  2. Culture: World Cup interest dims. https://www.forbes.com/sites/suzannerowankelleher/2026/05/05/hotels-world-cup-non-event-so-far/
  3. Politics: Massie mini-documentary.
  4. Law: Abortion pill at SCOTUS. https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/05/abortion-pill-dispute-returns-to-supreme-court/
  5. Geopolitics: Larry Johnson on Trump’s mixed signals. https://sonar21.com/ball-of-confusion-trumps-mixed-signals-on-iran/
*Bonus: Animated Fed history told by some friends of mine years ago that they gave away for free. 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals