VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Re: the growing authoritarianism on the right, or in general, discussed in last night's BWB.

When the Palestinians attacked Israel on October 7, the following day I got in an argument with my aunt over it because she was very pro-McCarthy and I was pro "make him do what Matt Gaetz bargained for any way possible", and she thought that we needed to get the House working as quickly as possible to go provide support to Israel. During this argument, I lost it (a lot), and told her, "you have been voting for Republicans for 25 years and they campaign on balancing the budget every year and haven't done it since Newt Gingrich was the Speaker of the house." I don't care what the excuses are--the fact of the matter is that their primary brand since 1995 has been "fiscal responsibility" and they haven't actually done it since 2001. It's 2026. The Republican political strategy is to lie to their voters to get elected, and to use the mantra that "Democrats are worse", to coerce them into voting Republican. They lie to their voters every. single. year. Because if they thought that the deficit was an existential threat, they'd have fixed it by now. And they have duped their voters for long enough. The younger generations have grown up with Republicans being the party of liars their entire lives.

I do consider our debt and spending a key piece of why our economy and country are broken, it's just lower down on my priority list of things on fire right now. I'm pretty sure Democrats are going to throw as many people in jail as possible, and that they already let in many more illegals than advertised, and will open the borders again with mass amnesty. I can't go to a gas station, a grocery store, in Oklahoma without hearing foreign languages spoken, seeing foreign kids, and running into people with headscarves. All our stores put the Mexican candy by the checkout kiosks now. You don't have a country anymore if you have a foreign population this big. It's gone. It's done. They're going to be made citizens and are never going to leave. I consider that our current biggest existential threat.

We have so many existential threats right now. Our American population, the white working class, and even the professional class, can't get jobs that earn enough value to buy homes and cars. Our kids are so uneducated they can't read their own Constitution. Our judiciary is filled with insane people, and has utterly decayed, rotted like a brown and pitted tooth that needs to be drilled out. Our legislatures can't pass laws that the legal system will follow--In Oklahoma we passed a law that's supposed to allow people to defend property, like in Texas, with deadly force, and they did such a bad job in writing it that the prosecutors and judges across the state effectively ignored it. Any one of these is enough to bring total destruction, but it's every system. Every single one. You can't even buy a washing machine and expect it to work for 5 years without repairs that cost more than the machine. Before our environmental regulation scheme you could buy a washing machine that worked for 25 years with affordable repairs. You can't buy candy at the convenience store that doesn't have carcinogens, that has real sugar in it. We created the USDA to protect people from "filled milk" and sawdust in our beans, now the USDA just requires that you label your sawdust as cellulose on the ingredient list, and your milk filler as soybean oil and carrageenan gum. You can't even go to the doctor and expect to interact with a doctor, you have no idea how much treatment is going to cost, it might end up giving you life-crippling debt, so you don't go. And we can't even pass legislation that requires that they post what the price will be before treatment. The Republicans were supposed to get rid of Obamacare--10 years later? We still have it. We have majorities in every branch of government. Again.

Republicans, as my husband pointed out in a post Rich read on his stream last night, have lied to their voters and used the prisoner's dilemma of Democrats being a greater threat, to get elected for over 25 years. So someone looking at voting, looking at the results, can rationally, logically conclude, that if they vote, they will not get what they voted for. Now where my husband and I differ is that I still think that the fix is getting young people to vote in Republican primaries to get the RINOs out. I think there is a solution and it's in building out communities. And when I say this my husband's response is: the Democrats with Republican consent, and Trump is doing it too, have intentionally destroyed every community, every space for organizing, every means of organizing, whether it be by targeting "militias" with infiltrated federal agents, or simply by letting corporations monopolize entertainment so that people are priced out of the modern tavern. People are so strapped for cash that they're strapped for credit--asking them to associate in public just means adding to their credit card debt.

If you are a white, working class or middle class person, then every single system that you interact with on a daily basis is not just broken--it's been co-opted to be hostile toward you. On a daily basis, the message from our society is: "Fuck your dog, fuck your back pain, fuck your home ownership, fuck your car's check engine light and the squealing sound it's making, fuck your white sounding name so you can't get a job interview, fuck your health, you lazy obese slob. Shut up and work, quit complaining." That's what it's like, all day every day. You can't even take your dog to see a vet without it costing $400.

So when you couple these two things together, the voting having been ineffective for decades, with the hostile system, the conclusion is: We don't have a Republic anymore. Our representatives are bound by our Constitution to guarantee a Republican government, and they don't represent their voters. The people getting ahead are the foreigners that lied to come here and run multi-million dollar federal welfare scams. If they can't get ahead because the system hates them, and they can't vote for improvement, the only solution that might save them from suffering is a Franco. They need a Franco to come in, get rid of the foreigners by whatever means possible, get the insane people in line, by whatever means possible, and give the people their country back. Or else the country is done. This is not an unreasonable, crazy person position.

It hinges upon a key assumption: the people in our country are no longer capable of maintaining a Republic. Montesquieu maintained that in order to have a Democratic system, your people needed to love virtue. In our current society, if you are virtuous, you are going to end up used and abused by those getting theirs first. You cannot have a low trust society and a democracy. Aristotle discusses this in On Politics: one of the key risks with a polity is that if the people are not virtuous, and they start to vote themselves the treasure, things devolve into authoritarianism. This is why I view education and foreigners as the current largest existential threats--they destroy culture. Our culture, one that loves virtue, is what makes us American and makes America America, and it's a tradition that needs to be intentionally cultivated and handed down, generation to generation. The Democrats broke this with Republican consent.

Keep in mind, the people believe that a Bukele-type can solve this problem are the ones who thought Trump was our last chance to save our country. They looked at the Democrat lawfare, coordinated by the White House, sending Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro to prison, issuing a billion dollar defamation judgment against Alex Jones, imprisoning the alternate slates of electors, and they, correctly, saw that as an existential threat. These people are disappointed that Trump did not uphold his promises. They are people that love their country and legitimately thought that their vote for Trump could save the country. Or at least they hoped he could. And now they're staring at slates of RINOs running for Republicans who still think they can campaign for Attorney General and say, "we need to get the politics out of government." When Democrats just tyrannically imprisoned anyone they could with the fig leaf of procedural propriety. The government system was subverted for their purposes, and it sent the message Democrats intended for it to send--Democrats will use whatever means necessary to put their boot on your neck and cut off the airflow. And when someone does that to you, the correct response is self defense. Someone who does that to you needs to be eliminated as a threat because Democrats will do it again the next time they get the chance. If Republicans represented their voters, they would have responded to the attacks with a vengeance. Instead they joined the January 6th committee to repudiate their voters, and attend black tie events with Democrats for several hundred dollar luxury dinners.

Just a final note, personally, I think what happens after a political conclusion like this is destruction of all of our systems, and the technocratic overlords with all the money and power rule over us as slaves, something like the Matrix body battery pods or work camps where we live in slums. The elites don't think regular people need air conditioning, they don't need cars, you can conclude the end-point of such an attitude if it controls society. So I think the correct answer is to gather political will to push back. I don't think it's beneficial to be defeatist in attitude because it'll bring about their forgone conclusion. But it's not illogical or unreasonable to come to that conclusion because of the political strategy the RINOs don't even realize is a strategy. The RINOs adopted their prisoner's dilemma strategy for their political gain, and made it part of their moral system, so they don't even realize that it is a political strategy anymore. You can't be a Republican and then lie to your voters. You have a Constitutional responsibility to represent your voters, to guarantee them a Republican form of government. Their own political strategy created this result.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
L Louise Lucas

FBI Raid On "Top Virginia State Senator" Reveals Utter Democrat Hypocrisy!

00:07:38
Hit piece on Kyle Seraphin

John Solomon and Steven Richards of Just The News just put out a hit-piece on Kyle Seraphin in which they claim that Kyle recklessly discharged a firearm on a firing range that was declared “cold”, diagonal across the line of the instructor who was on the range allegedly repairing a target.

The article states that “Seraphin acknowledged to Just the News in an interview last year that he was "dicking around" when he fired his weapon at his supervisor's target at the range in 2022, but he insisted the incident should not have led to his suspension and termination and that he believes he was a victim of whistleblower retaliation.”

The article goes on to alleged that when asked why he fired on the instructor’s target during the incident, Seraphin “said it is sometimes what you do when you are “d*cking around” with friends on the range.”

Sounds pretty incriminating.

Until you hear what Kyle actually said, and how Just The News absolutely took the word “d*cking around” out of ...

00:01:35
Clip from yesterday

Crazed Woman Tries to RUN OVER Kid on E-Bike - Gets Released WITH NO BAIL!

00:08:00
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Weekend Debate: Term Limits

Share your thoughts below.

Pros: Limit the permanent political class growing into an aristocracy of elites whose incumbency status and power-holding position affords them an institutional edge over competitors, encouraging a gerontocracy of lifelong politicians, disconnected from the real world of everyday economics and more likely to be embedded into a parasitic government-driven, power-access oriented system that empowers corrupt elites at the expense of the people.

Cons: In contemporary government, the real consequence of term-limiting the Thomas Massies of the world is to empower the permanent state, empowering bureaucracy over democracy, in lobbyists, career staffers, and the ever-expanding bureaucratic state, like a show of Yes Minister, married to the corrupting effect of donor class gatekeeping in the real world of modern elections driven by television expense ever consuming larger and larger shares of campaign exploding budgets to reach the ever growing number of voters they...

Questions for Bourbon w/ Barnes: Thursday, May 7, 2026

Ask in replies and answering LIVE at 9ish eastern tonight....

Questions for Bourbon with Barnes: Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Ask in replies and answering Live at 9ish eastern tonight.

post photo preview
The Weekend Barnes Brief: Friday, May 8, 2026
 
I. THE INTRODUCTION
 
A. Art of the Week
  • Venezia. The Atlantis-like ancient city with its bridges over canals, long boats mastered by the gondolier, the city whose balls made masquarade masks famous, where artisans of show-making spend a whole day to make a single show of artistic wonderment, a hidden restaurant in a corner alley uncovers the best Italian cuisine, and the city whispers of its centuries of stories from its cathedrals and water-hugging mansions of Casanova’s fame. 
 
B. Wisdom of the Week
  • You’re never out of the race. 
 
C. Cultural Recommendation of the Week
 
D. Appearances
 
 
 
II. THE EVIDENCE
 
A. Barnes Library: Weekly Curated Articles
 
B. Homework: Sunday Show Cases
  1. Malpractice. https://www.foxnews.com/us/iowa-woman-died-hernia-repair-nurses-dismissed-painful-post-surgery-symptoms-lawsuit
  2. Gates fake meat goes to court. https://texasagriculture.gov/News-Events/Article/10760/Opinion-Fake-Meat-Real-Trouble-Texas-Won-t-Bow-to-Billionaires-or-Bureaucrats
  3. DOJ sues Commierado for 2A.https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1439591/dl
  4. DOJ promises action against Big Ag. https://www.fooddive.com/news/beef-prices-trump-antitrust-doj-investigation/819331/
  5. Democrat raided. https://courthousenews.com/fbi-raids-democratic-virginia-state-senators-office/
  6. Insider trading indictment. https://www.justice.gov/d9/2026-05/usa_v._fejal_et_al_-_indictment.pdf
  7. Insider trading investigation https://seekingalpha.com/news/4588393-doj-probes-26b-in-war-linked-oil-trades---report
  8. Pay for play investigations https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-pardon-recipients-democrats-congressional-investigation-pay-to-play/
  9. EU: must allow welfare for migrants. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/kh-inps-cjeu-judgment.pdf
  10. DEI may lose, even in Twin Cities. https://courthousenews.com/minneapolis-public-schools-struggles-in-trump-suit-over-dei-policy/
  11. China spies on trial. https://courthousenews.com/feds-describe-global-network-of-chinese-police-stations-at-nyc-spy-trial-opening/
  12. Tiger’s DUI: Implied Consent Constitutionality Questions. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1401&context=elj
 
C. Deep Dive: The Economy
  1. Stock Market & Commodities: 
  2. AI Bubble & Capital Shift
  3. Housing
  4. Gold’s future. https://substack.com/inbox/post/196409142
  5. Inflation expectations. https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/inflation-expectations-jump-3-year-high-financial-pessimism-surges-ny-fed-survey
 
D.  Best of the Board
 
III. THE CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass -- The 30,000 Cap
 
  • Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 provides: “The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative.”  Interpretations clash: was this intended to impose a cap on the number of people a member of the House could represent, or the number of Representatives that could ever be in the House? Equally, who can enforce the rights of Section 2 as applied to Representatives?
  • Congress capped the number of representatives by the Permanent Apportionment Act of June 18, 1929, and has not changed it since. A 1941 federal law provided the means to assign seats after the Census. States contested this when it lost a seat after the 1990 census due to this cap.  The Supreme Court acknowledged this was not a question submitted exclusively to the Legislative branch as a “political question” beyond its jurisdiction to resolve. Thus, the question turns to the import and intent of the 30,000 rule — is it a cap on the number of representatives or is it a ceiling on the number of people represented?
  • The phraseology can be read either way — that the restaint is on the “number of” Representatives in a ratio to the population rather than the population size represented by the District; or that the ratio intends a cap on the number of people represented by each representative. Linguistically, the former argument holds more sway; historically and philosophically, the latter argument proffers more persuasive evidence.
  • If we see it as sufficiently ambigious to turn to the Constitutional record, we find that the ratio of the house to the population was intended to be close to the people at a size no more than 30,000 people, reflected in the papers of the Founding Fathers themselves.
  • Indeed, the controversy over this language almost sunk the Constitution itself, despite the supporters arguing in Federalist Papers throughout that this was a minimum of people to be represented not merely a cap on the number of representatives in the House. So much so, that the very first amendment ever proposed was to clarify this point: that the minimum number of representatives must be proportional to the population in a strict ratio. Due to an editing error as passed by Congress, the amendment never passed, though mostly it faded as the Founding generation protected the intended ratio in fact.
  • The best plaintiff to seek such a relif would likely be a state without representation due to the absence of this maximum number of people per representative, given the prior case-law on the subject, or, of course, Congress itself could remedy the problem all by itself. 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Briefer Barnes Brief: Thursday, May 7, 2026
  • Art of the Day
Something majestic of a colorful Oriole in flight, the feeling of freedom in the outstretched wings to soar in the sky, beyond gravity and above the landed earth, ready to roam and reign while seeking a safe and strong landing place for a bit of a rest. 
 
  • Board Post of Note
 
 
  • Economics
Burry of Big Short fame: Yen trade unwinding impacts. https://substack.com/@michaeljburry/note/c-205215463
 
  • Politics
Tucker & Massie.
 
  • Law
 
  • World
Peruvian elections feature left-right battle. https://boz.substack.com/p/peru-presidential-election-polls
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Briefer Barnes Brief: Wednesday, May 6, 2026

I. INTRODUCTION

  • A.  Art of the Day: Best way to start a day: early morning coffee. Maybe on a back porch. Maybe at a kitchen table. Maybe in a friendly diner. Maybe at a corner caffe. Maybe in a local coffee house. A tradition commenced in the hills of Yemen, it traversed the Islamic world until it reached Europe, where it turn the holy inspirational drink in the Turkish caves to the everyday place of chatter in the newborn cafes of Europe in the 17th century. Be that as it may, for many still, it signals the start of the day in a good way. 
  • B.  Board Post of the Day: https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7905561/title
II. THE EVIDENCE 

A.  Barnes Library

  1. Economy: Snider on gas prices.
  2. Culture: World Cup interest dims. https://www.forbes.com/sites/suzannerowankelleher/2026/05/05/hotels-world-cup-non-event-so-far/
  3. Politics: Massie mini-documentary.
  4. Law: Abortion pill at SCOTUS. https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/05/abortion-pill-dispute-returns-to-supreme-court/
  5. Geopolitics: Larry Johnson on Trump’s mixed signals. https://sonar21.com/ball-of-confusion-trumps-mixed-signals-on-iran/
*Bonus: Animated Fed history told by some friends of mine years ago that they gave away for free. 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals