VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

"Sri Lankan authorities reportedly said on Wednesday that the Sri Lanka Navy dispatched a rescue mission after a distress call from an Iranian ship. Sri Lanka sent ships and aircraft to rescue 30 Iranian sailors aboard the Iranian frigate - Iris Dena - which was sinking Wednesday just ouside the island's territorial waters, AFP news agency reported, citing foreign minister Vijitha Herath said. He told parliament that 30 injured sailors were being brought to a hospital in the island's south from the 180-crew frigate was sinking from dawn.

While exact details of the operation that ensued after the distress call were not known, an individual, who identified himself as a Sri Lankan journalist, wrote on X that the Iranian ship in distress was about 40 nautical miles off Galle.

Citing Aruna Jayasekara, deputy minister of defence, the person said the Navy and Air Force were conducting a joint rescue operation to extract the crew from the ship."
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/sri-lanka-navy-sends-ships-aircraft-after-distress-call-from-iranian-vessel-iris-dena-101772605277885.html


"The IDF carried out a new wave of airstrikes in Tehran targeting command centers linked to Iran’s security forces and the Basij militia, as hostilities with Iran and its allies continued to escalate across the region. The military also released a video of fighter jets striking an Iranian helicopter and troops preparing a missile launch. The IDF said the strikes targeted dozens of command centers belonging to Iran’s internal security forces and the Basij, a paramilitary organization that operates under Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and plays a key role in enforcing the regime’s authority..."
https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hjqtusbtzx#autoplay


"The IDF says it has launched a wave of strikes against Hezbollah infrastructure in Beirut.

It says further details will be provided later.

Ahead of the strikes, the military issued evacuation warnings for two buildings in the Lebanese capital."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/idf-says-new-wave-of-strikes-underway-against-hezbollah-targets-in-beirut/


"Defense Minister Israel Katz says any leader appointed by the Iranian regime to replace Ali Khamenei will be an “unequivocal target for elimination.”

“Any leader appointed by the Iranian terror regime to continue leading the plan to destroy Israel, threaten the US and the free world and the countries of the region, and oppress the Iranian people, will be an unequivocal target for elimination,” Katz says in a statement.

“It does not matter what his name is or where he hides,” he says..."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/katz-khameneis-successor-will-be-unequivocal-target-for-elimination/


"
Iranian Kurdish militias have consulted with the United States in recent days about whether, and how, to attack Iran’s security forces in the western part of the country, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.

The Iranian Kurdish coalition of groups based on the Iran-Iraq border in the semi-autonomous region of Iraqi Kurdistan has been training to mount such an attack in hopes of weakening the country’s military, as the United States and Israel pound Iranian targets with bombs and missiles.

The goal would be to create room for Iranians opposed to the Islamic regime to rise up now that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other top officials have been killed since the US-Israeli attack began on Saturday, two of the sources said..."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-in-talks-with-iranian-kurds-on-potential-cia-backed-op-for-uprising-sources/


"Senior US officials said Tuesday that President Donald Trump ordered strikes on Iran after Tehran demonstrated during three rounds of nuclear talks last month that it was not serious about giving up the capacity to produce a nuclear weapon.

“They basically offered us a lot of political wins and some concessions, but they were unwilling to give up the building blocks of what they needed to preserve to get to a bomb,” said one of the two senior US officials who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.

The two officials used the opportunity to offer new details on the three rounds of negotiations that were held, offering more context on Trump’s decision to launch Operation Epic Fury amid mounting criticism from Democrats and some MAGA Republicans regarding the urgency, strategy and timeline of the operation. Echoing comments made on Monday by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the second official added that Iran was trying to move additional nuclear facilities underground, this time without “air shafts,” which were used by the US to identify Tehran’s three main nuclear sites in strikes last year.

Laying out Washington’s objectives in the negotiations, the second senior US official said they were for Iran to hand over all of its highly enriched uranium; ensure that the three nuclear facilities hit by the US last year — Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan — would be decommissioned forever; guarantee that Iran would cease its support for proxy militia groups; and dismantle Iran’s ballistic missile program. The senior US official acknowledged that the latter two issues were not addressed in the three rounds of talks mediated by Oman. However, he said that the US decided those issues would be raised in separate talks that would include Arab allies, who are impacted by Iran’s missile program and support for proxies.

While Trump’s top negotiators Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff informed their Iranian counterparts during the talks that they expected Tehran to negotiate with its Arab neighbors on its missiles and proxy support, Iran never did so.

“That was one of the first tells — that while we agreed in good faith to allow the region to take on these two issues, the Iranians made no attempt whatsoever to convene the region and talk about them,” the first US official said. During the first round on February 6, Iran’s top negotiator, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, asserted that Iran had an “inalienable” right to enrich uranium and that it already had enough of it to produce 11 nuclear bombs, the US official said, echoing revelations made on Monday by Witkoff in a Fox News interview.

Joining Witkoff and Kushner at that meeting was US Army Central Command chief Adm. Brad Cooper, leading Araghchi to ask the Trump aides if they were trying to “threaten” Tehran by having him there.

“No, he just happened to be in the neighborhood,” Witkoff quipped in response, according to the first US official.

The American negotiators used the opportunity to press the Iranians on why they needed to be building their nuclear facilities underground, to which Araghchi responded that they don’t want their sites to be bombed.

“If there’s nothing nefarious being done there, then you shouldn’t be worried about a bomb,” Kushner responded, according to the first US official.

“We were very clear from the first meeting that we had with Araghchi that President Trump’s goal was to leave the region and the world safer than before, and if they wanted to act like a normal country, then we can have a really amazing relationship,” the US official recalled.
WASHINGTON — Senior US officials said Tuesday that President Donald Trump ordered strikes on Iran after Tehran demonstrated during three rounds of nuclear talks last month that it was not serious about giving up the capacity to produce a nuclear weapon.

“They basically offered us a lot of political wins and some concessions, but they were unwilling to give up the building blocks of what they needed to preserve to get to a bomb,” said one of the two senior US officials who briefed reporters on condition of anonymity.

The two officials used the opportunity to offer new details on the three rounds of negotiations that were held, offering more context on Trump’s decision to launch Operation Epic Fury amid mounting criticism from Democrats and some MAGA Republicans regarding the urgency, strategy and timeline of the operation.

00:12

21:24

Echoing comments made on Monday by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the second official added that Iran was trying to move additional nuclear facilities underground, this time without “air shafts,” which were used by the US to identify Tehran’s three main nuclear sites in strikes last year.

Laying out Washington’s objectives in the negotiations, the second senior US official said they were for Iran to hand over all of its highly enriched uranium; ensure that the three nuclear facilities hit by the US last year — Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan — would be decommissioned forever; guarantee that Iran would cease its support for proxy militia groups; and dismantle Iran’s ballistic missile program.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition
by email and never miss our top stories
Newsletter email address
Your email
Get it
By signing up, you agree to the terms
The senior US official acknowledged that the latter two issues were not addressed in the three rounds of talks mediated by Oman. However, he said that the US decided those issues would be raised in separate talks that would include Arab allies, who are impacted by Iran’s missile program and support for proxies.

While Trump’s top negotiators Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff informed their Iranian counterparts during the talks that they expected Tehran to negotiate with its Arab neighbors on its missiles and proxy support, Iran never did so.

“That was one of the first tells — that while we agreed in good faith to allow the region to take on these two issues, the Iranians made no attempt whatsoever to convene the region and talk about them,” the first US official said.

Advertisement

In this handout photo released by Iran’s Foreign Ministry on February 26, 2026, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (L) speaks with Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi during their meeting in Geneva. (Iran’s Foreign Ministry / AFP)
A peaceful underground program?
During the first round on February 6, Iran’s top negotiator, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, asserted that Iran had an “inalienable” right to enrich uranium and that it already had enough of it to produce 11 nuclear bombs, the US official said, echoing revelations made on Monday by Witkoff in a Fox News interview.

Joining Witkoff and Kushner at that meeting was US Army Central Command chief Adm. Brad Cooper, leading Araghchi to ask the Trump aides if they were trying to “threaten” Tehran by having him there.

“No, he just happened to be in the neighborhood,” Witkoff quipped in response, according to the first US official.

The American negotiators used the opportunity to press the Iranians on why they needed to be building their nuclear facilities underground, to which Araghchi responded that they don’t want their sites to be bombed.

“If there’s nothing nefarious being done there, then you shouldn’t be worried about a bomb,” Kushner responded, according to the first US official.

“We were very clear from the first meeting that we had with Araghchi that President Trump’s goal was to leave the region and the world safer than before, and if they wanted to act like a normal country, then we can have a really amazing relationship,” the US official recalled.

Advertisement

“You would think that with these guys at their weakest point ever, with President Trump — who is proven not to be a bluffer — moving real assets to the region, we thought they would show real movement toward creating a real deal. But all we got were games and tricks and denials,” the first US official lamented, indicating that talks got off on the wrong foot. In the second meeting on February 17, Araghchi told Witkoff and Kushner that Iran would never let the Americans “achieve something diplomatically that [they] weren’t able to achieve militarily,” the first US official recalled, characterizing it as a slip-up that the Iranian foreign minister tried to later walk back.

Also during that second meeting, the US negotiators asked their Iranian counterparts to put together a full proposal detailing the concessions Tehran would be willing to make, the second US official said.

While Washington asked to receive the proposal before the third round convened on February 26, Iran did not comply.

Instead, its negotiators showed up to the third meeting with a one-page declaration professing that it does not want a nuclear weapon.

When Witkoff and Kushner asked if the Iranians had the detailed proposal that was requested, the latter handed over a roughly half-a-dozen-page document that tried to make a case for Tehran to be allowed to have a limited, “needs-based” enrichment program over a ten-year period, the second US official recalled.

Iran barred the American negotiators from taking the document back to Washington for consultation, but the US official said he did a quick review of it on site and was “dismayed.” While it detailed Iran’s handover of nuclear material to the US, it “essentially would have allowed them to enrich at a multiple of five times what was allowed under the JCPOA,” the US official said, referring to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which capped enrichment at 3.67% purity. Trump abandoned the deal in 2018, and Iran subsequently massively increased its enrichment toward weapons-grade levels. The Iranian proposal’s details regarding the existing Tehran Research Reactor also set off alarm bells for Witkoff and Kushner, the US second official said.

When the Americans shared the document with International Atomic Energy Agency director Rafael Grossi — who was also participating in the talks — they concluded that Iran was asking to be able to produce over seven times as much uranium as what would be needed for medical purposes, the US official said.

“The claim that they were using a research reactor to do good for the Iranian people was a complete and false pretense to hide the fact that they were [trying to] stockpile there,” the official added, claiming that the proposal would have kept Iran only weeks away from enough weapons-grade material to produce a nuclear bomb. Witkoff and Kushner used the third meeting to test Iran’s claim of merely seeking a peaceful civil nuclear program by offering for the US to provide Tehran with free fuel to do so.

“They really twisted themselves into pretzels to try to explain how enrichment was their national right and their national pride,” the first US official said.

While the Iranians and the Omani mediators wanted the US to publicly project positivity about the third round of talks, Witkoff and Kushner felt there was not enough to be upbeat about, the official said.

Reporting back to Trump after last Thursday’s talks, Kushner told him, “Look, if you want us to make an Obama kind of deal, maybe it would be an Obama-plus deal, we could probably get one done..."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-officials-say-diplomatic-path-was-at-dead-end-when-trump-approved-iran-strikes/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
One of the best shots in my life

And I got it on camera!

00:00:32
Bowling night

First three shots have been open frame, spare, strike.

Let’s see if it continues with the upward trajectory.

00:00:18
February 28, 2026
OUTRAGE After Wyoming Man Runs Down Wolf, Takes to Bar for Selfies Before KILLING, and Avoids Jail!

Here's the story

Download Rumble Wallet now and step away from the big banks — for good! https://rumblewallet.onelink.me/bJsX/vivafrei

00:08:59
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Questions for Bourbon with Barnes: Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Ask in replies and answering Live at 9ish eastern tonight.

First good News of the Night. Dan Crenshaw getting BTFO'd

post photo preview
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Friday, February 27, 2026

I. INTRODUCTION

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Weekend of February 20, 2026

I. INTRODUCTION

A.  Art of the Week

  • When Picasso painted me before I was born, his portrait of famous patron saint of the arts, Ambroise Vollard. The painting struck my brother when he first saw it in person, as a biographical portrait of yours truly. The intensive, internal self-reflection expresses a true self-recognition. My favorite portrait to this day, even if only of me across the psychic plains of time and space.  

B.  Recommendation of the Week

C. Wisdom of the Week

  • “I am a tariff man, with a tariff plan, standing on a tariff platform.” President William McKinley. 

D.  Appearances

II. THE EVIDENCE

  • A reminder: links are NOT endorsements of the authors or their interpretation of events, but intended to expand our library of understanding as well as expose ideas of distinct perspective to our own. 

A. Barnes Library: Curated Weekly Articles of Interest

  1. 1776 Law Center Survey: War Vote Mirrors Midterms https://www.bigdatapoll.com/blog/democrats-expand-generic-ballot-lead-in-february/
  2. Iran War risk. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/war-on-iran-is-the-opposite-of-realism/
  3. Welfare state fraud. https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/the-democrats-fraud-problem
  4. Utility battles. https://prospect.org/2026/02/19/blackstone-private-equity-utility-acquisition-new-mexico-public-service-txnm-energy/
  5. Remembering Jessie Jackson. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/jesse-jackson-complicated-man/

*Bonus: Bald eagle rescued. https://abc7ny.com/post/nypd-officers-describe-rare-rescue-trapped-american-bald-eagle-icy-hudson-river-nyc/18616678/

B. Best of the Board: Five Fantastic Posts of the Week

  1. Bill Brown’s comedic relief. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7704528/title
  2. Jonathan’s prayer. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7704685/morning-daily-prayer-heavenly-father-i-thank-you-for-blessings-everyday-i-thank-you-for-my-beloved
  3. Meme magic. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7704745/title
  4. Bountiful art. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7704798/title
  5. Board thoughts on Iran war. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7700010/board-poll-war-in-iran

*Bonus: Bondi mockery. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7703469/spotted-all-over-washington-dc-while-i-normally-don-t-share-the-political-views-of-people-in-dc

**Bonus: Weekly Wisdom. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7704649/the-intersection-of-politics-youtube-commentary-and-critical-traffic-infrastructure-https-you

C. Homework: Cases of the Week for Sunday

  1. SCOTUS: Tariffs. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf
  2. Facebook trial. https://courthousenews.com/safety-was-someone-elses-problem-ex-facebook-vp-says-in-teen-social-media-trial/
  3. Jury bias in Musk case. https://courthousenews.com/contempt-for-musk-clouds-jury-selection-in-twitter-takeover-trial/
  4. Amazon death. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/amazon-nitrite-washington-supreme-court-2.pdf
  5. Virginia redistricting stalls. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/tazewell-injunction.pdf
  6. British ex-royal arrested. https://courthousenews.com/ex-prince-andrew-arrested-on-suspicion-of-sharing-sensitive-documents-with-epstein/
  7. Firetruck monopoly. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/mke-v-fire-truck-manufacturers.pdf
  8. ICE churches. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/synod-v-dhs-ice-injunction.pdf
  9. Tina Peters denied bond. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/people-tina-peters-order-bond.pdf
  10. Slushie fraud. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/slush-puppie-forged-email-with-icee.pdf
  11. The HP merger case. https://business.cch.com/ald/USvHewlettPackardEnterpriseCo122025.pdf
  12. Tunney Act Trump DOJ risks. https://prospect.org/2025/07/29/2025-07-29-law-could-blow-open-trump-antitrust-corruption/

*Lobbyist disclosure laws. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/2/chapter-26

**Lobbying disclosure guidelines. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/resources/pdf/S1guidance.pdf

***Transanity in Canada. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7704549/tribunal-ruling-out-of-british-columbia-canada

III. CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass Series — Article I, Tariffs

  • Article I, section 7 enumerates the power “for raising revenue” to the legislative branch of Congress, commencing with the House and continuing onto the senate. 
  • Article I, section 8, clause 1 enumerates the power “to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises” to the legislative branch in Congress. 
  • Article I, section 8, clause 3 enumerates the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations” to the legislative branch in Congress. 
  • Article I, section  8, clause 5 enumerates the power to “fix the standard of weights and measures” to the legislative branch in Congress. 
  • Article I, section 8, clause 10 enumerates the power to “define and punish” those “offenses against the law of nations” to the legislative branch in Congress. 
  • Article I, section 8, clause 11, enumerates the power to “declare war” as well as “grant letters of marque and reprisal” and “make rules concerning captures on land and water,” to the legislative branch in Congress. 
  • Article I, section 8, clause 18 enumerates the power to “make all laws” that “shall be necessary and proper” for effectuating those other enumerated powers itemized above in the tariff context. 
  • Article I, section 10, clause 2 prohibits states from imposing any imposts or duties on imports or exports except as necessary for inspections. 
  • In aggregate and in particular, the Constitution enumerates to the legislative branch the power to tariff. Hence, any claim of Presidential power to tariff must derive from delegated authorizations issued by Congress. This runs into the NonDelegation doctrine. 
  • Article I, Section I enumerates “all legislative powers” must be exclusively “vested in a Congress” not the executive or judicial branch of government. Thus, the act of a tariff imposition by the President must be both exclusively authorized by Congress and not be a “legislative act” within the meaning of Article I, Section 1. That construction depends largely on the Supreme Court’s construal of it over time, which is beyond the plain text of the Constitution.  
  • Short answer: had Trump stayed strictly within the tariff authorization delegations of Congress, and without looking like “making law” in the process, then his tariffs could win judicial assent. Trump’s failure to follow those guidelines — as advised to do by Commerce Secretary and Epstein Class graduate Howard Lutnick, whose sons profit billions from the court striking down the tariffs — buried his chance at tariff approval by the Supreme Court, unfortunately. 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief, Valentine's Weekend, 2026

I. INTRODUCTION

A.  Art of the Week

  • All I want for Valentine's is Lady Justice. Archangel Michael delivering justice, as we need for those in the Epstein Class. 

B.  Recommendation of the Week

C.  Wisdom of the Week

  • “I weep for the liberty of my country when I see at this early day of its successful experiment that corruption has been imputed to many members of the House of Representatives, and the rights of the people have been bartered for promises of office.” Andrew Jackson. 

D.  Appearances

II. THE EVIDENCE

A reminder: links are NOT endorsements of the authors or their interpretation of events, but intended to expand our library of understanding as well as expose ideas of distinct perspective to our own. 

A. Barnes Library: Ten of the Top Curated Weekly Articles

  1. The Epstein elite. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/unsettling-truths-epstein-files-reveal-about-power-and-privilege
  2. Corruption of the academy. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/2026/03/mellon-foundation-humanities-research-funding/685733/
  3. Israel 1st wants to end Free Speech. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2026/02/13/is_free_speech_really_the_highest_value_153834.html
  4. Nobody likes Newsom. https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/gavin-newsom-youre-no-bill-clinton
  5. Hawley-Warren bill seeks to end monopoly in medicine. https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/senators-seek-to-smash-big-medicine
  6. Polymarket grocery stores. https://unherd.com/newsroom/inside-polymarkets-free-public-grocery-store/
  7. Security State. https://greenwald.substack.com/p/amazons-ring-and-googles-nest-unwittingly
  8. Housing market woes. https://substack.com/home/post/p-187448844
  9. Leverage risks. https://quoththeraven.substack.com/p/countdown-to-detonation-americas
  10. Epstein network. https://epstein-doc-explorer-1.onrender.com

B. Homework: Cases of the Week for Sunday

  1. Texas AG joins Dr. Bowden. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/press/Bowden%20Intervention%20(Filed)_0.pdf
  2. Alex Jones sues. https://www.scribd.com/document/997131709/Alex-Jones-Amended-Counterclaim-for-Filing-In-The-United-States-Bankruptcy-Court-For-The-Southern-District-Of-Texas
  3. Gail Slater removed. https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/trump-antitrust-chief-ousted-by-ticketmaster
  4. I will sue Mike Davis. https://x.com/barnes_law/status/2022467828255768629?s=20
  5. Wisconsin election integrity takes a loss. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/wisconsin-ballot-spoiling-ban-reversed.pdf
  6. Texas election integrity gets a win. https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/24/24-50783-CV0.pdf
  7. Two big 2A cases in 3rd. https://courthousenews.com/two-third-circuit-hearings-could-reshape-nations-second-amendment-rights/
  8. Another TPS order blocked. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/african-communities-v-noem-mass-ruling.pdf
  9. Epstein BOA suit goes forward. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/doe-v-bank-of-america-new-york-ruling.pdf
  10. Dollar Tree death. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/max-antonio-garay-v-dollar-tree.pdf
  11. Boasberg latest insanity. https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2025cv0766-247
  12. Trump immigration win. https://www.phelps.com/a/web/r5pKxiJkFZ7QKozjTbS8V2/ca5detention.pdf

*Bonus: Livenation Ticketmaster Antitrust https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/music/music-industry-news/live-nation-doj-lawsuit-after-gail-slater-resignation-1236504011/

**Bonus: NCAAF eligibility suit. https://www.knoxnews.com/picture-gallery/sports/college/university-of-tennessee/football/2026/02/13/joey-aguilar-eligibility-hearing-tennessee-vs-ncaa/88659399007/

***Bonus: AI plagiarism win. https://www.newsday.com/long-island/education/adelphi-university-ai-plagiarism-lawsuit-oh07enyz

C. Best of the Board: Ten of the Top Posts

  1. Too much truth. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7688284/best-explanation-of-our-two-party-system-benowen
  2. Life on the line. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7687846/god-bless-and-protect-thomas-massie
  3. Prayer & a cute dog. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7688117/daily-prayer-2-0-heavenly-father-give-us-comfort-and-wisdom-allow-us-to-trust-your-judgement-and-y
  4. Surf. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7688060/pipeline-hawaii
  5. Real diversity. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7688513/title
  6. Hush Hush ideas. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7688104/robertbarnes-just-saw-a-news-article-talking-about-the-great-chicago-fire-being-started-by-communis
  7. Wisdom. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7687331/title
  8. Bill Brown Proverbs. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7686413/title
  9. Truth. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7684892/title
  10. My answer is Yes. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7687202/does-god-answer-your-prayers-i-ask-because-i-pray-everyday-whether-typed-down-here-or-mentally-reci

III. CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass Series — Article I, Elections

  • Article I, section 4 empowered the legislative branch of the federal government — the Congress — “may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations” otherwise set by the legislatures of the state governing the “elections for Senators and Representatives” except to the Places of chusing Senators, later modified by the Seventeenth Amendment. Each House can further be the “Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members” including the power to expel “with the Concurrence of two thirds.” The Constitution affords no express power to Congress to elect the President or elect those to state or local office. And remember, Article I powers are constricted to those “herein granted” explicitly within the Constitution. 
  • Representatives must be “apportioned” amongst the States “according to their respective Numbers”, a determination made by “adding to the whole Number of free Persons” certain individuals no longer referenced after the Fourteenth Amendment. The “actual enumeration” of this apportionment “shall be made…within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.” The original intention was that there were at least one representative for “every thirty Thousand”.
  • The Fourteenth Amendment modified these provisions by stating representatives be apportioned “to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed.” Of note, the provision also stripped representation of any state which limited Presidential electors beyond the limits of gender, age, citizenship, crime, or rebellion. 
  • The Fifteenth Amendment modified these provisions further by providing a “right of citizens of the United States to vote” and that such a right could not be denied on basis of race. 
  • The Seventeenth Amendment modified these provisions further by providing that the “people thereof” elect the Senators instead of the legislative branches of those state governments. 
  • The Nineteenth Amendment modified the provisions even further by expanding the Fifteenth Amendment’s right of citizens to vote to women. 
  • The TwentyFourth Amendment modified these provisions even further by holding the right of the citizens to vote in federal elections could not be limited based on taxes, including poll taxes. 
  • The Twenty-Sixth Amendment expanded these voting rights to include those 18 years of age or older that are citizens. 
  • Each of these Amendments repeated: “the right citizens of the United States to vote” as the entire premise of these Amendments to the Constitution for governing elections. Yet, somehow, the courts held in 2020 no such right existed to even afford standing to request judicial relief from stolen elections for the highest office in the land, and even when brought between states for the only nationally elected office? 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals