VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

"A selection of intelligence documents, which shed light on Israel's strategic blindness leading up to the October 7 massacre, was published on Thursday by the Prime Minister's Office.

Some of the documents were also read aloud during the Defense and Foreign Affairs Committee meeting on Thursday.

The documents, spanning from February 2023 to an hour before the attack, indicate that Israel's defense echelon misread Hamas’s intentions, characterizing the terror group as deterred and seeking long-term economic arrangements.The release of these documents by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu comes to reinforce his narrative of a systemic failure that seemingly crossed all branches of the security establishment, as he refuses to establish a commission of inquiry into the October 7 massacre.

Members of the inquiry would be chosen by the Supreme Court's president and granted full access to the documents and protocols, unlike senior security establishment officials, who currently have no access to them.One of the documents is a summary of a high-level security assessment held on September 27, 2023, just ten days before the massacre. According to the document, representatives from Military Intelligence (Aman) told Netanyahu that Hamas’s policy was one of "controlled pressure" meant to improve economic conditions in Gaza.

"Their understanding is that they do not want to reach an escalation," the representatives stated, according to the transcript, which also presented former Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) director Ronen Bar as framing the situation as Hamas's "partial satisfaction."

According to the document, he also noted that the group "very much does not want to enter a round of fighting."Per the same transcript, former defense minister Yoav Gallant seemed to support moving toward a "long-term arrangement" with the terror organization.

"Hamas is signaling a desire for a long-term arrangement... my recommendation is to move forward on the arrangement path... to strive for long-term quiet," Gallant said, according to the document, and that his assessment was that Hamas "does not want" a war.

The documents also seem to present the belief that Israel's internal political divisions, which peaked in 2023 over the judicial reform, acted as a "restraining factor" for Hamas.

A military intelligence report published by the PMO from September 14, 2023, argued that Hamas viewed Israel as "unpredictable and dangerous" due to the internal situation, which supposedly justified Hamas’s strategy of "preserving the quiet."A summary from October 3, 2023, four days before the attack, claimed that "Hamas in the Gaza Strip continues to grow stronger, but at a moderate slope," and concluded that "the Palestinians will not be the driving force behind a multi-front campaign."

A February 2023 Shin Bet report noted that Hamas was investing in "force multipliers" to bypass the border fence, yet concluded that the group's "readiness for a raid" had remained "medium" and unchanged since 2021.

At 5:15 a.m. on October 7, just over an hour before the first rockets were launched and thousands of terrorists breached the Gaza border fence, the reports show that Bar conducted a situational assessment and said that the "chance of a broad campaign is low" due to a reported lack of intelligence indicators.

According to the published documents, the "leading assumption" among security officials at that hour was that Hamas was afraid of Israeli offensive activity.

The directive issued at dawn on October 7 was to maintain "medium readiness" covertly, so as not to create a "miscalculation" that might provoke Hamas, according to the transcripts.

In addition, Netanyahu claimed that the original documents allegedly contained no mention of informing his office of the overnight developments, and that any mention of such a thing was added after the fact."
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-885798


"Conspiracy theories have swirled around Jeffrey Epstein for years — that he worked for the Mossad, that he was “Israel’s greatest ally,” that his crimes were inspired by the Talmud.

The latest tranche of files from Epstein’s case does not confirm the allegations, but has still fueled antisemitic and anti-Israel hostility from the left and from the right...The Epstein files are documents compiled by investigators on the late sexual predator and financier since he was arrested in 2005 for abusing girls. The documents shed light on Epstein’s sprawling, global network of powerful acquaintances.

There are millions of documents in the files, many unrelated to sex trafficking, and parsing the material is tedious and time-consuming. The documents are shorn of context, names are redacted, there are duplicates, and due to formatting, some documents do not respond to search terms. Investigators record tips they receive, whether they are accurate or not, and the veracity of many claims in the files is impossible to verify.

The overwhelming volume of material means that, while it is difficult to process the documents into coherent and accurate narratives, there is plenty to cherry-pick and blast out on social media. That, coupled with the difficulty of disproving a negative, makes the files fertile ground for conspiracies.

Take the widespread allegation that Epstein was an Israeli intelligence agent from figures like Tucker Carlson, who said at a summit last year that Epstein was working for a “foreign government.”No one’s allowed to say that foreign government is Israel,” Carlson said, leaning into tropes about both hidden Jewish power and Jewish control of the media.

The Mossad is mentioned repeatedly in the files, but so is the CIA, the UK’s intelligence services, and the KGB. Nearly all mentions of the agencies are news reports that Epstein received via email. Israel is mentioned in thousands of documents, but fewer times than countries including Russia, China, Canada and France.

In one email, after being invited to Israel, Epstein rejected the invite, saying, “I do not like Israel. AT ALL.”

The Mossad is mentioned in some of Epstein’s personal correspondence, without evidence that he worked for the intelligence agency.

Epstein was friendly with former prime minister Ehud Barak, meeting with him dozens of times, which was known years ago. In 2018, while discussing a meeting via email, Epstein told Barak, “You should make clear that I don’t work for Mossad,” followed by a smiley face. The first rumors of Epstein’s connections to Israeli intelligence had started at around the same time.

In 2017, Barak asked Epstein if another acquaintance “got to the Mossad guys through you?” Later, Epstein, possibly confused, asked Barak if he had helped facilitate work with former Mossad agents. Barak told Epstein to call him, but didn’t answer his phone.

An audio recording of a conversation between Epstein and Barak that was more than three hours long stood out for its banality. The private conversation did not mention the Mossad. In addition to Epstein’s ties with Barak, he knew other world leaders such as US President Donald Trump, the UK’s former Prince Andrew, and harsh critics of Israel like Noam Chomsky.

Other allegations in the files are from unknown sources and do not provide evidence.

A sender named Mark Iverson said in 2021, after Epstein’s death, that he suspected Epstein, as well as his partner Ghislaine Maxwell and her father Robert, “were all Mossad agents.” His evidence was Robert Maxwell’s funeral in Israel. The email’s recipient was redacted.

Another email, citing an anonymous tipster to the FBI, said the source had been “convinced that Epstein was a co-opted Mossad agent,” without any further information.

Both allegations were presented as suspicions, indicating the anonymous sources did not have actual evidence. It’s possible the accusers were animated by the same antisemitic conspiracies about conniving Jews as the commentators propagating the allegations after the files’ release.

That’s it for Mossad in the millions of files. It’s not impossible that Epstein had ties to Israeli intelligence, but amid the mountains of material, the evidence isn’t there.There are also Epstein files that say the Earth was once flat, refer to an alien abduction, and that humans could control the weather “with the super lasers.”

Like previous releases of files from the case, the tranche put out this week still inspired another round of Mossad conspiracies, from Iranian state media to leftist Gen Z influencers.

The statements highlighted the so-called horseshoe theory of antisemitism, which posits that the political spectrum is not a straight line, but a near-circle, with the far-left and far-right converging, particularly when it comes to Jews and Israel.

Carlson is an exemplar of the theory, as his far-right hostility to Israel merges with the views of leftist guests such as the UN special rapporteur for the Palestinians Francesca Albanese and Ben Cohen of Ben & Jerry’s.

Carlson hosted the progressive activist Cenk Uygur on his show on Friday to discuss “Epstein, JFK, and 9-11 Files,” tying all three incidents to Israel, as well as the Iraq war.

“There’s just no question about it. He is definitely intelligence, and in every turn, he’s looking to help one country and it’s Israel,” Uygur said of Epstein.

“You get the sense that it reveals the superstructure beneath. It gives you a glimpse into how power is exercised globally,” Carlson said."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/no-the-epstein-files-dont-show-that-he-worked-for-mossad/


"The United Arab Emirates has drafted plans to build a compound to house thousands of displaced Palestinians in a part of south Gaza under Israeli military control, according to a map seen by Reuters and people briefed on the plans.

The planning map shows where the “UAE Temporary Emirates Housing Complex” would be constructed near Rafah, once a city of a quarter million people but now almost completely destroyed and depopulated by Israeli forces.

An Arab diplomat told The Times of Israel that the UAE has not made a final decision on whether to fund the pilot housing project in Rafah..."
https://www.timesofisrael.com/map-shows-uae-planned-compound-for-palestinians-in-israeli-held-south-gaza/


"Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned behind closed doors that Israel must closely monitor the growing strength of the Egyptian military, citing sensitivities in relations with Israel's southern neighbor.During a classified discussion of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Netanyahu said the Egyptian military was "building up" and that Israel needed to ensure the buildup did not go too far.

"The Egyptian military is growing stronger and this needs to be monitored. We have a relationship with Egypt, but we must prevent an excessive buildup," Netanyahu said.

Despite the tensions, Israel and Egypt signed a $35 billion gas deal last December. The deal was pushed by the US, and the same frictions reportedly delayed its finalization.

Meanwhile, as part of the investigation known as QatarGate, suspicions have emerged that messages originating in Qatar and aimed at smearing Egypt were also disseminated by advisers to the prime minister who are suspects in the affair."
https://www.israelhayom.com/2026/02/05/netanyahu-we-must-prevent-the-egyptian-military-from-becoming-too-strong/


"Arab diplomatic sources say the regime in Tehran is expected to announce major changes to Iran's security apparatus in the near future, according to a report published Thursday in the Persian Gulf..."
https://www.israelhayom.com/2026/02/05/report-iran-considers-shake-up-of-revolutionary-guards-command/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
February 04, 2026
I love Florida!

Today’s video is going to be a good one.

00:00:26
February 04, 2026
Update in George Zinn Case

Clip, in case you missed yesterday's stream

00:15:48
February 03, 2026
One of the last videos with Pudge

There is thus old fable of the woman who goes to the town elder and complains about how complicated her life is.

The elder says to get a goat.

She asks why, and he says just get the goat.

She has the goat for a month and her life is constant labor. Cleaning up after the goat. Feeding the goat. Washing the goat

A month later, she gives the goat back.

And she quickly realizes how boring her life was all along without the goat.

We did this for nearly a decade.

She was the greatest dog ever.

00:01:05
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Why I'm Optimistic

Despite the shortcomings in Trump the sequel, I see great opportunity in the executive branch amongst open minds wanting to improve public policy, the chance to influence the next generation of policy makers in a populist, reformist direction at the local, state, federal & global level, with communities like this one to help make it a reality. They don't try so hard to lie to you if your opinion didn't matter. They don't try so hard to censor you if your voice didn't matter.

Questions for Bourbon with Barnes: Thursday, February 5, 2025

Ask in replies and answering Live at 9ish eastern tonight...

Link for tonight’s movie review

Here it is, 7 o’clock :-)

post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Weekend of January 30, 2025

I.   INTRODUCTION

A.   Art of the Week

·      One of the first superb memes for the Brief, recollecting a device many youngsters might not even recognize: the old typewriter, with its diligent use of the keys that moved like a an old cash register before recording its mark onto the page, and the ever needful Whiteout to fix the inevitable error, stacking the pages neatly somewhere nearby because once lost, never recovered. A time when writing required a different kind of dedication.

B.   Wisdom of the Week

·      “Civility is not a sign of weakness, but of strength.” President John Kennedy.

C.   Recommendation of the Week

·      Current book club reading over at People’s Pundit on the important virtue of a return to civil society. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17974854-our-virtuous-republic

D.  Appearances of the Week

·      Chatting w/ Stanislav.

II.   The Evidence

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Friday, January 23, 2025

I. INTRODUCTION

A.  Art of the Week

A dream work space, atop a lighthouse, with wrap-around windows above the ocean’s roar and the tumult of the waves cresting and crashing against the rocks below, a wrap-around desk to match the window shape, a good hard wooden chair for support, and the necessary small heater with stove to keep it warm and refreshed. I love architectural spaces that marry the inner world to the outside, the natural external environment to the man-made inside. Makes me want to read, work, think, and dream. 

B.  Recommendation of the Week

The peculiar history of the Sixteenth Amendment. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22474138-the-law-that-never-was-vol-1-the-fraud-of-the-16th-amendment-and-pers

C.  Wisdom of the Week

“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” Frederic Bastiat. 

D.  Appearances

II. THE EVIDENCE 

A reminder: links are NOT endorsements of the authors or their interpretation of events, but intended to expand our library of understanding as well as expose ideas of distinct perspective to our own. 

A. Barnes Library: Five of the Top Curated Weekly Articles 

  1. Dems warn: losing cultural issues. https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/democrats-and-the-siren-call-of-culture
  2. Replicating DOGE. https://www.city-journal.org/article/elon-musk-doge-states-waste-fraud?skip=1
  3. Cuba next for regime change. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/is-cuba-next/ar-AA1UEeUA
  4. Trump 2024 coalition lost. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/01/22/polls/times-siena-national-poll-crosstabs.html
  5. Out of WHO! https://thehill.com/policy/international/5702306-us-officially-withdraws-from-who/

B. Homework: Dozen of the Top Cases of the Week for Sunday

  1. ICE Home Raids w/o a Warrant. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/can-ice-enter-a-home-to-make-an-arrest-with-only-an-administrative-warrant
  2. Don Lemon charges. https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/22/don-lemon-prosecution-justice-department-00741629
  3. SCOTUS: state rules in Med Mal cases. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-440_1b82.pdf
  4. SCOTUS: Restitution is punishment. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-482_d1oe.pdf
  5. SCOTUS: Time deadlines for void cases. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-808_lkgn.pdf
  6. SCOTUS: Trump & the Fed. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25a312_c0nd.pdf
  7. SCOTUS: 2ndA. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-1046_hejm.pdf
  8. 2A & property. https://courthousenews.com/appeals-court-weighs-challenge-to-texas-gun-signage-laws/
  9. Trump vs JP Morgan. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/trump-v-jp-morgan-miami-eleventh-judicial-circuit.pdf
  10. Games of chance. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/minnesota-tribe-loses-challenge-to-electronic-table-games.pdf
  11. Target cancer. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/dangerous-acne-treatment.pdf
  12. Bayer immunity. https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/monsanto-company-v-durnell/

*Bonus: Section 241 & 1A. https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/case-files/monsanto-company-v-durnell/

**Bonus: Section 241 in the 8th Circuit. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/6/1297/576550/

***Bonus: Warrants. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/403/443/

C. Best of the Board: Ten of the Top Posts

  1. Stay chill. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7627349/title
  2. JD welcome. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7627643/i-sure-hope-and-pray-that-jd-gets-a-chance-to-lead-our-country-after-this-trump-administration-he
  3. Peace Board thoughts. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7627852/a-very-interesting-take-on-trumps-peace-board-is-trump-creating-a-new-organization-undermining-the
  4. Immigration data review. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7627593/food-for-thought-are-the-claims-that-around-2-million-illegal-aliens-have-already-self-deported-too
  5. Fun satire. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7627870/title
  6. Scott Adams memorial. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7627060/livestream-in-honor-of-scott-adams-next-sunday-jan-25-i-hope-it-s-the-biggest-livestream-ever
  7. Brilliant photos. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7626511/some-northern-lights
  8. CIA Insanity. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7626494/robertbarnes-robert-barnes-has-repeatedly-referred-to-this-egregious-seymour-hersh-article-in-re
  9. Don Lemon Church videos. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7627194/here-is-dons-full-live-stream-im-not-good-at-clipping-things-out-or-screen-recording-so-those-of
  10. Fun memes. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7627227/title

*Bonus: Biblical wisdom. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7626746/today-s-thought-11and-behold-there-was-a-woman-which-had-a-spirit-of-infirmity-eighteen-years

III.  Closing Argument: Constitution Masterclass Series — Article I, Power to Tax

  • As part of the enumerated legislative powers granted Congress by the Constitution, none is more potent, and potentially destructive, of liberty and property than the power to “raise revenue.” Under section 8 of Article I, this affords the “power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposes and excises” to “pay the debts” or “provide for the common Defense” or provide for “the general Welfare of the United States.” Of note, the Constitution separately affords the legislative branch methods of revenue raising independent of taxes and tariffs — the power “to borrow money on the credit of the United States” and the power “to coin money” as well as “regulate the value thereof.” 
  • The limits on this power to tax derive from several other sections of Article I. Under Section 7 of Article I, all bills for raising revenue must originate in the House, not the Senate. The next limit is substantive rather than procedural: “all duties, imposts and excises” have to be “uniform throughout the United States.” The foremost, fundamental limit requires any “direct taxes” must be “apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union.” Indeed, section 9 of Article 1 imposes the requirement that “no capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein.” Of note, no tax could be imposed on articles exported from a state. 
  • These two big requirements — Uniformity and Apportionment — are the key restraints on the power to tax, segregating taxes into two separate categories: Direct Taxes and Indirect Taxes. Indirect Taxes only require Uniformity. 
  • Uniformity requires indirect taxes operate with the same force and same effect in every state, precluding Congress from geographical favorites. Uniformity is solely a prohibition on the geographic impact of the tax, rather than classification based on some factor other than geography. Apportionment is the real hurdle. Apportionment req tires direct taxes be divided among the states based on  that state’s population, a politically impossible barrier to cross in the modern era. This effectively neuters the power of Congress to impose any Direct Tax without Constitutional Amendment. 
  • What then is a Direct Tax? The first case to address this dates to the early years of our Constitutional Republic, when Supreme Court Justices wrote their own opinions, often without a shared majority. The law at issue as a carriage tax. Complaining about how apportionment would make any tax “absurd and inequitable” the early Court decided to water down the Direct Tax definition in order to escape the Apportionment Constitutional conditionality of such a tax. The split amongst the jurists left the question mostly undecided, with the dumbest argument being the Justice who claimed if a Direct Tax could not be easily apportioned, then it was magically no longer a Direct Tax. The latter would be invalidated and effectively mocked by the Court a century later, when it noted “such a tax, for more than one hundred years of national existence, has as yet remained undiscovered, notwithstanding the stress of particular circumstances has invited thorough investigation into sources of revenue.” 
  • The Court invalidated the income tax portions of the Tariff Act of 1894. That Act limited itself to a 2% tax on $4K+ of income, which 99% of Americans did not owe, as exempt from it. The tax imposed a tax on real estate rents, and Congress justified it as an excise tax and thus Indirect. The Court clarified the definition of Direct Tax in accord with originating principles: any tax whose liability “cannot be avoided” was a Direct Tax; only taxes that could “shift the burden upon someone else” with “no legal compulsion to pay them” were considered Indirect. The Court went further, and identified Direct Taxes as the kind commonly imposed by States at the time of the Founding, including taxes on real estate, personal property, or the rents or income thereof, like taxes on people. Taxes on franchises, privileges or use were seen as Indirect Taxes. The dissenting justices would have held a tax on revenues “severed from the source” of those revenues was an Indirect Tax. That dissent would matter decades later. 
  • The Sixteenth Amendment removed the apportionment  clause for the tax power, providing: “Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States” or in proportion to the census or enumeration herein. Why? Because the Supreme Court determined the 1893 federal tax on incomes was a “Direct Tax” that had not been apportioned. This removal of “incomes” from the apportionment requirement tempted Congress to never define the word income itself in the future hope they could escape and evade the apportionment requirement by just labeling a future new tax a tax “on incomes.” 
  • The understanding of how broadly Congress could label a tax as an “income” tax to escape apportionment for direct taxation took a turn in 1916, when dissenting Justices from the prior 1896 decision now held sway. They decided that the 16th Amendment merely codified their 1896 dissent, thus forever constraining Congress’ capacity to use the income tax exception from apportionment as its escape and evasion tool. Congress’ answer was to simply never define income ever again, except in manners self-referential and circular. 
  • A fully enforced Constitution would find any tax on property or people directly that make individual Americans liable must be apportioned unless within the limited definition of income the Court gave it — gain and profit severed from the source of that gain and property. Like much of our policy debates, a solution often sits in the text of the Constitution itself. 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief, Weekend of January 16, 2025

I. INTRODUCTION

A.  Art of the Week

  • The shadows chasing the light along the wall, sitting back pondering and searching for the perfect expression, the contemplative thought at the typewriter seeking the text to capture the image and escape the mind into the universe and speak it into truth, French doors open the platform under a Moroccan style key-shaped window onto the world outside mirroring the mind within. An artistic articulation of the weekly entreaty to craft the Barnes Brief.  

B.  Recommendation of the Week

C.  Wisdom of the Week

  • “Here then is an infallible criterion, by which the nation may judge of the intentions of those who govern it ... if they corrupt the morals of the people, spread a taste for luxury, effeminacy, a rage for licentious pleasures, - if they stimulate the higher orders to a ruinous pomp and extravagance, - beware, citizens! beware of those corruptors! they only aim at purchasing slaves in order to exercise over them an arbitrary sway.” Emer de Vattel, The Law of Nations. 

D.  Appearances

II. THE EVIDENCE

A.   Barnes Library: Ten of the Top Curated Weekly Articles 

A reminder: links are NOT endorsements of the authors or their interpretation of events, but intended to expand our library of understanding as well as expose ideas of distinct perspective to our own. 

  1. Democrats losing path on Immigration. https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/the-bankruptcy-of-the-democrats-elvis
  2. Dems’ Identity Politics problem. https://josephklein.substack.com/p/dem-blindness
  3. Gun-boat politics: the risks. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2026/01/what-would-trumps-threatened-strikes-colombia-mexico-or-cuba-achieve
  4. Google as AI Dictator. https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/will-google-organize-the-worlds-prices
  5. Trucker protest to secession. https://trendcompass.substack.com/p/breakup-of-canada-alberta-independence
  6. The literary scam. https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/perhaps-people-are-cynical-about
  7. Russia’s new weapon: Thor’s Lightning. https://bmanalysis.substack.com/p/oreshnik-vs-lviv-targets-i
  8. Pardon problems. https://x.com/kenvogel/status/2012223411523588300?s=20
  9. Iran: bombs not problem-solvers. https://substack.com/home/post/p-184501786
  10. Iran CIA-Mossad coup fails. https://substack.com/home/post/p-184279171

*Bonus: Board member w/ The Duran on Venezuela

placeholder

B.  Homework: Cases of the Week for Sunday

  1. Powell Prosecution https://quoththeraven.substack.com/p/the-powell-affair-and-the-limits?
  2. SCOTUS: 4th Amendment https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-624_b07d.pdf
  3. SCOTUS: Elections. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-568_gfbh.pdf
  4. SCOTUS: 2nd Amendment. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/24-1046/357868/20250501090640899_24-1046%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf
  5. SCOTUS: Single conviction. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-5774_9nbe.pdf
  6. Insurrection in Twin Cities https://newsletter.amuseonx.com/p/minnesota-is-rejecting-federal-sovereignty
  7. ICE Sued. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/ACLU-v-Trump-Admin.pdf
  8. Musk v ChatGPT https://courthousenews.com/elon-musks-fraud-claims-against-openai-set-to-go-to-trial/
  9. 1A case goes to sanctions stage. https://courthousenews.com/judge-slams-government-for-conspiring-to-chill-free-speech-of-pro-palestine-students/
  10. EPA’s forever chemicals. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/lawsuit-PFAS-environment.pdf
  11. Tina Peters appeal.
  12. Benshoof Municipal Appeal. 

*Bonus: Constitutional questions about the Federal Reserve. https://southerncalifornialawreview.com/2024/05/14/the-federal-reserve-and-the-constitution/

**Bonus: Subs w/o consent. https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/open-lawsuit-settlements/625000-educative-subscription-class-action-settlement/

***Bonus: Bondi burying cases of corporate corruption. https://www.citizen.org/article/canceled-corporate-enforcement-trump-first-year-second-term/

C.  Best of the Board: Ten of the Top Posts

  1. A delicious photo. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7607864/title
  2. Beware of dangerous Karens when out in the wild. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7607634/https-x-com-tarabull-status-2012125177245466820-s-20-i-blame-the-cia-fbi-for-creating-these-der
  3. Music industry vs Big Tech. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7607465/for-those-interested-elon-musk-vs-the-music-industry-jan-16-2025-top-music-attorney
  4. Bill Brown effective comedic memes. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7606729/title
  5. The color revolution behind ICE protests. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7607435/this-is-organized-crime-https-thepostmillennial-com-radical-anti-ice-network-uses-mass-signal-cha
  6. Types of TDS multiply. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7607854/tds-trump-derangement-syndrome-type-a-and-b-type-a-oppose-hate-trump-at-all-costs-even-when-he-i
  7. Biblical blessing of obstacles. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7607379/james-1-2-4-have-you-ever-wondered-why-would-a-loving-heavenly-father-allow-his-children-to-go
  8. Trump 2nd term portrait? https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7606837/i-d-be-ok-with-this
  9. Good health news from a Board member. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7606735/just-another-update-on-ken-s-progress-following-his-esophagectomy-i-m-honestly-amazed-at-his-re
  10. Ideas for improving cars. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7605241/policy-proposals-to-improve-modern-cars-ban-def-in-new-designs-for-diesel-engines-ban-it-becaus

III.   Closing Argument: The Constitution, Article I: The Law of Nations

  • Contrary to some claims, the Constitution recognizes international law and its potential applicability to the actions of the various branches of the government. 
  • The Preamble provides the purpose: provide for the common dense, insure domestic tranquility, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty. 
  • Section 8 of Article 1 empowers Congress to both law and collect duties on foreign goods; “to regulate commerce with foreign nations”, “establish a uniform rule of naturalization”, to “borrow money on the credit of the United States”, to “define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the High Seas”; to define and punish “offenses against the Law of Nation”; to “make rules concerning captures on land and water”;and no person holding “office of profit or trust” may accept any “present, emolument, office, title of any kind” from a foreign state. 
  • Section 2 of Article 2 provides for the power of the President “to make Treaties” which become legally binding when “two thirds of the Senators present concur.” 
  • Of note, the judicial power in Article 3, section 2 provides for the all cases arising under the Treaties made to be adjudicated, along with all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction and controversies concerning foreign states, citizens or subjects. 
  • Article 6 provides for debts to be “valid against the United States” while making “all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States” as “the supreme law of the land” binding all judges in every state “notwithstanding” any contradiction in their own state laws or state constitution.
  • What is the “Law of Nations” referenced by our founders in the Constitution charging Congress with drafting its criminal enforcement mechanism? Colloquially called in the Latin as Jus Gentium, it forms the legal precepts governing relations between sovereign states, rooted in custom and treaties, defining the rights, duties and conduct of nations in areas like international waters, conflict between nations, emigration and immigration between nations, extradition and deportation between nations, and commerce between nations. The origin of this derives from Roman law and concepts of universal jurisdiction. Catholic scholars would add natural law from universal moral precepts and principles as part of it, from which doctrines like jus cogens originate. 
  • A prominent scholar recognized and respected by the Founders informed their judgment — the Swiss jurist Emer de Vattell, entitled The Law of Nations. Every thoughtful writer of the Constitution included the text in their library and amongst their lexicon for inspiring their own construct of the justifications for the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution itself. 
  • The same doctrine animated the most celebrated application of natural law to the law between nations and citizens in foreign lands — the Nuremberg trials. A good index can be found here: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/imt.asp
  • Later codified into the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, America led the way in establishing universal norms of conduct for both citizens and states to engage in. A critical constituent justification for the jus cogens norms derived from the existence of God and natural law. In other words, those that claim “no international law exists” are not just ignoring the Constitution and American-led legal precedent, they are rejecting natural law and the divine inspiration that shapes and justifies it. As always, in general guide to law and life, trust the Founders first, and second, never trust taking the side of the Nazis or those so aligned. 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals