VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
December 21, 2024

This one is thanks to @FuzzyCreature :

I created a custom GPT with all 17,000 pages of the Weaponization of Government document that was just released.

You can use it yourself here: https://chatgpt.com/g/g-676718a7dd988191aff4125d419d1abd-weaponization-of-government-report-analyst

This is a long detailed list and will be posted in multiple parts due to its length.

"Abuse of Power: A Comprehensive List of Alleged Federal Crimes by Key Figures in Government and Society"

Introduction

The following comprehensive list details allegations of potential federal crimes committed by key figures across government, corporate, and other influential sectors. These individuals, including high-ranking officials, corporate executives, and policymakers, are alleged to have violated laws protecting the integrity of the United States' justice system, constitutional rights, and public trust. From obstruction of justice and suppression of free speech to mishandling classified information and fabricating intelligence, the alleged actions outlined below have far-reaching implications. Together, they paint a troubling picture of systemic abuse of power, lack of transparency, and an erosion of the principles of accountability and fairness. Each entry is meticulously detailed to provide clarity on the allegations, the crimes potentially committed, and the consequences these actions may have on American society and democracy.


1. David Weiss

Total Potential Penalty: 25 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Delaying Prosecution of Hunter Biden:

  • Incident: Allegedly slowed investigations and failed to bring timely charges against Hunter Biden for potential tax evasion and firearms violations despite evidence of wrongdoing.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States).
    • Explanation: As U.S. Attorney for Delaware, Weiss had the authority to pursue these charges but delayed and sought special counsel authority, which critics allege was a move to obscure inaction.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Obstruction of Justice:

  • Incident: Allegedly tampered with or blocked investigations into Hunter Biden’s financial dealings, including international activities with potential links to influence peddling.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (Tampering with a Witness, Victim, or an Informant).
    • Explanation: Weiss is accused of preventing investigators from pursuing key leads or interviewing witnesses who could implicate high-profile individuals.
    • Penalties: Up to 20 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: American taxpayers, who rely on impartial justice and accountability for federal crimes.
  • Impact: Undermined public trust in the Department of Justice (DOJ) by allegedly providing preferential treatment to a politically connected individual. This has fueled public perceptions of a two-tiered justice system, eroding confidence in fair law enforcement.

2. Lisa Monaco

Total Potential Penalty: 25 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What She Allegedly Did:

1. Mismanagement of DOJ Investigations:

  • Incident: Allegedly used her position as Deputy Attorney General to suppress or interfere with investigations into politically sensitive matters, including the Hunter Biden case.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States).
    • Explanation: Monaco is alleged to have coordinated or directed DOJ staff to stall or limit investigations involving politically connected individuals.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Obstruction of Justice:

  • Incident: Allegedly directed DOJ officials to withhold or obscure evidence during high-profile investigations.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (Tampering with a Witness, Victim, or an Informant).
    • Explanation: Suppressing whistleblower testimony or documentation that could expose wrongdoing.
    • Penalties: Up to 20 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: Federal whistleblowers and the American public, whose faith in the justice system is compromised.
  • Impact: These actions allegedly prioritized political objectives over impartial enforcement of the law, further entrenching a culture of favoritism within the DOJ.

3. Hillary Clinton

Total Potential Penalty: 20 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What She Allegedly Did:

1. Mishandling Classified Information:

  • Incident: As Secretary of State, Clinton used a private email server to conduct official government business, which included transmitting classified information.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 793 (Gathering, Transmitting, or Losing Defense Information).
    • Explanation: Mishandling sensitive government communications, including classified intelligence, by storing it on an unsecured server, potentially exposing national secrets to unauthorized access.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Obstruction of Justice:

  • Incident: Allegedly directed the deletion of thousands of emails after they were subpoenaed during the investigation into her email practices.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (Destruction, Alteration, or Falsification of Records in Federal Investigations).
    • Explanation: Deleting or destroying emails to avoid scrutiny and potential evidence exposure.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: U.S. intelligence agencies and the American public, who were potentially exposed to security risks.
  • Impact: Compromised national security and eroded public trust in accountability for high-ranking officials.

4. Merrick Garland

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Interference in DOJ Investigations:

  • Incident: Allegedly influenced investigations into politically sensitive matters, including cases involving Hunter Biden and election-related inquiries.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1505 (Obstruction of Proceedings Before Departments, Agencies, and Committees).
    • Explanation: Actions or directives designed to limit or terminate investigations into politically charged matters.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Suppression of Whistleblower Testimony:

  • Incident: Prevented whistleblowers from testifying or retaliated against them for exposing misconduct.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights).
    • Explanation: Conspired to suppress testimony or punish individuals attempting to expose wrongdoing.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: DOJ whistleblowers and federal investigators stymied by suppressed testimony.
  • Impact: Damaged the credibility of the DOJ as a neutral enforcer of the law, furthering perceptions of a politically driven agenda.

5. Jen Easterly

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What She Allegedly Did:

1. Censorship of Political Speech:

  • Incident: Used her role as CISA director to coordinate with social media companies to suppress posts deemed "misinformation," including lawful speech.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights).
    • Explanation: Colluded with private entities to violate Americans’ First Amendment rights by suppressing lawful political speech.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Relocation of Censorship Operations:

  • Incident: Moved censorship activities to non-profits funded by CISA after federal lawsuits arose, in an attempt to evade legal scrutiny.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States).
    • Explanation: Shifted activities to external entities to circumvent legal restrictions and public accountability.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: Social media users and American citizens, whose rights to free speech were undermined.
  • Impact: Strengthened the narrative of governmental overreach and censorship, significantly damaging public trust in institutions.

6. Mark Zuckerberg

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Collusion with Federal Agencies to Suppress Political Speech:

  • Incident: Zuckerberg admitted that Facebook suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story following pressure from the FBI. This suppression took place during the 2020 election, under the guise of addressing potential “Russian disinformation.”
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights).
    • Explanation: Participated in an agreement with federal agencies to suppress free speech by demoting a news story on Facebook that was lawful and of significant public interest.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Providing False or Misleading Testimony to Congress:

  • Incident: Zuckerberg’s testimony regarding Facebook’s actions in content moderation contained inaccuracies or omissions about the extent of the government’s influence on Facebook policies.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements).
    • Explanation: Willfully provided misleading statements to Congress about Facebook’s role in suppressing lawful political discourse.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: Facebook users, the broader American public, and the democratic process.
  • Impact: Undermined public trust in free and fair elections by suppressing information critical to voters’ decision-making, further damaging trust in major tech platforms’ neutrality.

7. Hunter Biden

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Tax Evasion and Money Laundering:

  • Incident: Failed to report significant income derived from foreign business dealings, including funds received from entities in China and Ukraine, and structured transactions to avoid detection.
  • Specific Crime: 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (Attempt to Evade or Defeat Tax).
    • Explanation: Evaded paying taxes on income from overseas business deals by using shell corporations and false reporting.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000 per offense.

2. False Statements on Federal Firearms Application:

  • Incident: Provided false information on ATF Form 4473 to purchase a firearm, failing to disclose his history of drug abuse.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) (False Statements in Acquisition of Firearms).
    • Explanation: Lied about drug use while purchasing a firearm, violating federal law.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: The American taxpayer, law-abiding firearm purchasers, and financial institutions.
  • Impact: Eroded public confidence in the fairness of federal law enforcement and tax regulations, fueling concerns about unequal application of justice.

8. Andrew McCabe

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Leaking Classified Information:

  • Incident: Allegedly leaked sensitive information about the FBI’s Clinton Foundation investigation to the media without authorization.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 793 (Gathering, Transmitting, or Losing Defense Information).
    • Explanation: Improperly shared classified or sensitive information with reporters to influence public perception of ongoing investigations.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Lying to Federal Investigators:

  • Incident: Provided false statements under oath to the DOJ Inspector General regarding his role in the leaks.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements).
    • Explanation: Misrepresented facts during an official investigation, obstructing accountability efforts.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: FBI personnel, whistleblowers, and the American public.
  • Impact: Diminished trust in the FBI’s impartiality and fostered a perception of corruption within federal law enforcement.

End of part 1....

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
December 17, 2025
Nature is amazing

Out for a ride with Ethan this morning. Nature class at homeschooling. Lol Look what we captured!

00:01:09
December 16, 2025
A little bit of a pallette cleanse

This video gets cuter and cuter as it progresses, and funnier and funnier each time I rewatch it

00:00:51
December 14, 2025
I am a man of many talents!

This may or may not have been the first try, but gosh darn it, first try!

00:01:00
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Board Poll: Trump Term 2, Year 1

What grade would you give the trump administration for year 1 in his 2nd term? Add your own thoughts, comments, and ideas in the replies too.

Interview w/ Dr. Bowden & Brook Jackson
Interview/ Tom Woods
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Week of December 19, 2025

I.   INTRODUCTION

A. Art of the Day

Christmas music, my favorite season thanks to my father, by wondrous choirs, which also was my father’s favorite form of Holiday cheer. This particular album from the Vienna Boys Choir.

B. Wisdom of the Day

“Ignore them, and you get Fuentes, but worse.” Carl Benjamin on young men in the west.

C. Cultural Recommendation

Greatest Christmas movie ever. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097958/

D. Appearances

  • LIVE w/ Tom Woods
  • LIVE w/ Dr. Bowden & Brook Jackson

II.   THE EVIDENCE

 *Note: A reminder — links are NOT endorsements of the ideas contained therein. The Library is big, and it often consists of ideas I do not personally share, but whose ideas are worth further exploring.

A.  Daily News of Interest

  1. Erika Kirk announces support for Vance 2028. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/erika-kirk-endorses-jd-vance-for-president/ar-AA1SEd5F
  2. Left populism rebuild. https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/the-future-of-the-left-in-the-21st-ef0
  3. Big MAHA wins on trans interventions. https://www.themahareport.com/p/breaking-kennedy-signs-medical-declaration
  4. Somali fraud. https://archive.is/lMATr
  5. Georgia comes clean on 2020, in part. https://thefederalist.com/2025/12/17/fulton-county-we-dont-dispute-315000-votes-lacking-poll-workers-signatures-were-counted-in-2020/

*Bonus: Kimchi heals. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/12/251216081945.htm

B. Daily Deep Dive: Zoomer Men Rebel

  1. Zoomer men missing relationships. https://isaiahmccall.substack.com/p/gen-z-men-have-given-up-on-dating
  2. Condemned for their gender. https://yougov.co.uk/society/articles/52863-young-men-masculinity-and-misogyny
  3. No good jobs. https://fortune.com/2025/08/25/gen-zers-neets-jobless-men-unemployed-higher-rates-women-healthcare-coding-ai/
  4. No home. https://fortune.com/2025/12/12/gen-z-giving-up-on-owning-home-spending-more-saving-less-working-less-risky-investments/
  5. Carl Benjamin explains.

*Bonus: Hollywood attacks young men. https://slate.com/culture/2024/11/entertainment-hollywood-masculinity-male-role-models-movies-tv-social-media.html

C. Cases of Consequence

  1. Brown University murder case. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/claudio-neves-valente-reddit-brown-shooting-b2887811.html
  2. Epstein Files release.
  3. Bongino retires. https://x.com/barnes_law/status/2001725595022160288?s=20
  4. Judge convicted. https://www.npr.org/2025/12/18/nx-s1-5648584/judge-hannah-dugan-guilty-obstruction-ice
  5. 1stA & immigration judges. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/opinion-immigration-judges-free-speech-trump.pdf
  6. Maryland reparations legislation. https://apnews.com/article/slavery-reparations-wes-moore-veto-maryland-9c134edbf0410228035743a8dc546171
  7. Luigi. https://courthousenews.com/luigi-mangione-faces-uphill-battle-after-marathon-evidence-hearing/
  8. 1A & new antisemitism laws. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/antisemitism-lawsuit.pdf
  9. Minnesota whistleblower suit: bogus child abuse grant scam. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/sharon-vs-harper-complaint.pdf
  10. Walmart sexual assault. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/walmart-could-have-foreseen-sexual-assault.pdf

*Bonus: Baby Shark suit. https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/892398f9-ac03-458a-8ba1-dce37861e63c/1/doc/24-313_opn.pdf#xml=https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/892398f9-ac03-458a-8ba1-dce37861e63c/1/hilite/

III.     Best of the Board: Trump Admin Grade

On the 1st year of the 2nd term of the Trump administration

  • UncleBugbite: I'm a young man with decades ahead of me to suffer under our bullshit kleptocracy. Sure, Kamala Harris isn't president right now. But Trump's absolute failure to address the structural problems is laying the groundwork for something much worse and better prepared than stupid Kamala Harris, with a desperate population willing to risk more extreme measures for any sort of relief. Trump's weakness is wasting the tiny opportunity we had to fix things, and frankly I'm terrified.
  • JoeKD: This Country was a FUCKING MESS. You just don't clean up a Mess like that in 9 months. Give the man some time. It'll get there. As far as Foreign Affairs goes, he needed to spend alot of time on that to get our Allies back in line.
  • TJefferson: Positives: Immigration/border; JD vance/RFK jr/Tulsi; Multiple pardons; A single month of DOGE. Negatives: Everything else
  • Iceni2103: what are we comparing it to? compared to the alternative, it is B+ to A range. Kamala or Biden 2 would have been an utter disaster. compared to the promises: D+? some good things (mostly border, hard changes to trade, and some executive reforms), but he is falling down way too much (hyping up 'peace deals' that don't last, warmongering Venezuela, dragging out Ukraine, unforced errors on staffing and by extension big issues like Epstein, DOGE/BBB, and MAHA, listening to neo-cons like he needs to please them, focus on donors not voters).
  • Bdmichael09: The only thing hes actually done that truly matters is stop the insane flow of mass migration. That is great, but he hasn't delivered really on anything else. Russia/Ukraine is still a shit show. He bends over and takes it up thr ass for Israel daily rather than put them in their place as the welfare recipients of the US that they are. This nonsense with Venezuela needs to stop, now. He hasn't handled any of the corruption in the bureaucratic state. His push to lower interest rates is a recipe for disaster. We need more restrictive monetary policy after the covid insanity, not easy money policy. Its going to take at least a decade to recover from those awful Congressional decisions in 2020 and 2021. He hasn't actually held the DEI bureaucracy to account in Universities. Many universities kept all of the DEI people but renamed the departments/roles and there has been 0 follow up on actually stomping that out.
  • Ktrimbach: I go back and forth between B- and C+. He’s still the best President of my life (starting with Nixon), but Oh so much less than he could be!

IV.    Closing Argument: The Constitution, Article 1, The Power of Impeachment

  • Aside from the power of the purse, the other principal power afforded the legislative branch is the power to remove executive officers, including the President and Judges, in the power of Impeachment.
  • As always, we start, first and foremost, with the text. Section 3 of Article 1 provides the House
    shall have the sole Power of impeachment” while ascribing to the Senate “the sole Power to try all Impeachments.” The Constitution requires “no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.” The constitution constricts the impact of impeachment to “not extend further than to removal from Office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States.” Further, “the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment according to Law” by authorities other than the legislative branch.
  • Of note, Article 1 otherwise remains mute on the issue of impeachment. The other Articles answer who can be impeached and the legal predicates for cause to issue such impeachments. Section 4 of Article 2 provides impeachment for the President, Vice President “and all civil Officers of the United States.” The cause permitted for their impeachment is limited to “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” The power to impeach judges is only indirectly referenced, as section 1 of Article 3 provides judges can only hold their offices “during good behaviour.” The only other reference to cause for removal is the obligation for all judicial officers to be “bound by oath or affirmation to support this Constitution” in Article 6. The rules of impeachment permit “each house may determine the rules of its proceedings” in section 5 of Article 1. The “civil officers” subject to impeachment parallel the “principal officers” the Senate must be “advised” and “consented” to the appointment of under Article 2.
  • While executive officers can only be impeached for “treason, bribery or high crimes and misdemeanors”, judges can be impeached simply for not holding office during “good behaviour.” Some scholars argue the ‘good behaviour” phrase was just a limitation on at-will firing, and not an independent grounds for impeachment and removal, but early American practice and ancient English practice belies that construction. The contrast evidences that good behavior is a broader provision than treason, bribery or high crimes and misdemeanors. A judge can be impeached for non-criminal conduct. The phrase derives from the Latin – as long as they shall behave themselves well. The legacy of the phrase derives from old English practice dating to the 12th century, intended to protect against arbitrary removal or removal without any limits on discretion, comparable to the principle difference between “at will” employment and “for cause” limits on firing.
  • What constitutes such cause for judicial removal? Consider early American practice: merely being drink on the bench was sufficient for impeachment. The principal and paramount precedent of impeachment of judicial officers is the impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase in 1804. What grounds did the House recite: “arbitrary, oppressive and unjust” handling of a trial, including partisan prejudice especially, as reflected in the application of the law, exclusions of evidence, and inaccurate recitations of the law to grand juries. Two examples include the failure to remove biased jurors, excluding defense witnesses, and generally “tending to prostitute the high judicial character with which he was invested, to the low purpose of an electioneering partizan.”
  • Sound like any Judges you know? 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Week of December 12, 2025

I. INTRODUCTION

A.  Art of the Week

As the birds make their winter trip in synchronized form, they almost magically make the form of their species in live time in the air, captured in the moment by a photographer’s film, reminding us of the Creator’s noble design and winking at us in real time. 

B.  Recommendation of the Week

An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States by Charles Beard unmasked that many of the men at the Convention Hall in Philadelphia were not as enlightened and allied to the Founding generation as later history would tell the tale. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/187702.An_Economic_Interpretation_of_the_Constitution_of_the_United_States

C.  Wisdom of the Week

Affording politicians “a universal, unbounded permission” to take another’s liberty or property in the name of the public fisc will “when the expenses of the nation, by their ambition are grown enormous” inescapably “oppress and subject” the citizenry.” William Symmes. 

D.  Appearances

  • Dr. Bowden
    placeholder

E.  Best of the Board

  1. Birthright citizenship. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7341595/is-the-nationality-act-of-1940-the-proper-starting-point-for-analyzing-the-scope-of-subject-to-th
  2. Viva done w/ Candace. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516832/update-about-a-month-ago-i-asked-for-prayers-for-my-mom-since-we-were-going-to-get-an-update-on
  3. Curated content from @CCandent https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516486/title
  4. Massie: let’s leave NATO. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516236/massie-introduces-bill-to-get-us-out-of-nato-by-paul-dragu-the-new-american-representative-thom
  5. Nice ruling in PA. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516323/robertbarnes-well-at-least-there-are-still-a-few-judges-in-pa-that-follow-the-constitution-good-r

*Bonus: Personal hope. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516832/update-about-a-month-ago-i-asked-for-prayers-for-my-mom-since-we-were-going-to-get-an-update-on

F.  Best Across the Internet

  • Disconnect from purpose.
    placeholder

II. THE EVIDENCE

A.   NEWS OF THE WEEK: The Library

  1. EU crosses Rubicon. https://x.com/PM_ViktorOrban/status/1999358779763183953?s=20
  2. Vaccines & chronic disease. https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/125
  3. Disney’s AI gamble. https://x.com/HedgieMarkets/status/1999170314580746623?s=20
  4. Lindell goes for Governor. https://x.com/realMikeLindell/status/1999191330829009327?s=20
  5. Honduran election dispute. https://x.com/SalvaPresidente/status/1998955182277722383?s=20

*Bonus: Foster kids helped. https://x.com/MAHA_Action/status/1999241337745670236?s=20

B.    DEEP DIVE: RUSSIA-US Reasons for Alliance

  1. Tucker: Russia-US natural allies. https://x.com/AFpost/status/1998968887724183834?s=20
  2. Russia: world’s richest resources. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-top-10-countries-by-value-of-all-their-natural-resources/
  3. Russia: world’s largest country. https://x.com/World_Insights1/status/1999029803458965765?s=20
  4. Russia: world’s largest nuclear arsenal. https://www.icanw.org/nuclear_arsenals
  5. Russia’s GDP replaced Europe. https://x.com/IslanderWORLD/status/1978510171589513504?s=20

*Bonus: Russia’s traditional culture. https://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1998812811171082739?s=20

C.   HOMEWORK: Cases in Controversy

  1. SCOTUS: Trump authority over bureaucracy. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-332_7lhn.pdf
  2. SCOTUS: campaign spending limits. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-621_q86b.pdf
  3. SCOTUS: sentencing the disabled. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-872_b07d.pdf
  4. SCOTUS: Covid immunity limits. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-180_8m59.pdf
  5. SCOTUS: Bondi defends Whitmer Fednapping convictions. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25-5249/387036/20251210183835177_Croft_Opp_12.10.pdf
  6. Courts extend special protection to Maryland Man. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/paula-xinis-grants-abrego-garcia-tro-block-rearrest.pdf
  7. Share Ryan v. Crenshaw. https://x.com/ShawnRyan762/status/1999554231842349564?s=20
  8. Pipe Bomber Patsy. https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1999541341466866022?s=20
  9. Big Tech contempt. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/epic-games-vs-apple-ninth-circuit-opinion.pdf
  10. Pentagon wins trans ban. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/dc-circuit-trans-soldier-ban-opinion.pdf
  11. Russia Euroclear Arbitration possibilities. https://share.google/FdKIPKgvLfEeJXsUz & https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaties/bit/3645/belgium-luxembourg---russian-federation-bit-1989-
  12. Doctor liability for patient’s drugs. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/oregon-supreme-court-cyclist-doctor-liability.pdf

*Bonus: Ferrari Tennessee tax case up in flames. https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a69556804/whistlindiesel-tennessee-allegations-ferrari-tax-evasion/

**Bonus: Class Action AI in Healthcare. https://www.fisherphillips.com/en/news-insights/new-class-action-targets-healthcare-ai-recordings.html

***Bonus: What does AI own? https://www.commonplace.org/p/matthew-b-crawford-ownership-of-the

III.  CLOSING ARGUMENT: Masterclass -- The Constitution Article I, The Power of the Purse

  • The first power of the purse the Constitution affords the legislative branch of government in Article I is the power to pay themselves, as section 6 of Article 1 provides: “The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States.” 
  • The second power of the purse is Article I's most controversial and most consequential: the power to tax and the power to borrow, or, colloquially, the power to “raise Revenue” in section 7. The mechanism for “raising revenue” shall be by legislation that “shall originate in the House” and then be concurred with by the Senate. The power finds explicit enumeration in Section 8: lay taxes; collect taxes; lay duties; collect duties; lay imposts; collect imposts; law excises; collect excises; pay debts; borrow money on credit of the US; coin Money; regulate the value of Money; regulate the value of foreign Coin; fix weights and measures; appropriate money to support Armies (capped at 2 years); provide and maintain a Navy; provide for arming the Militia; and the broad “necessary and proper” catchall in Section 8. The power of the purse finds further enumerated restrictions within Section 1 itself, though subsequent Constitutional provisions could further constrain and restrain the power of the Purse: section 8’s requirement that all “duties, imposts and excises” must be “uniform”; section 9’s prohibiting a tax on importation of people capped at $10 per person; prohibiting any tax that constitutes a bill of attainder or ex post facto law; no direct tax unless apportioned amongst the states; no tax on exports; no port-preferential tax; and no money spent that is not “in consequence of appropriations made by law”. 
  • The Sixteenth Amendment clarified one key aspect of the power of the Purse: enumerating Congress “power to tax” including the power to “law and collect taxes on incomes” regardless of “whatever source derived” without requiring apportionment. This removal-of-the-source rule was later interpreted to be a Congressional reversal by Constitutional Amendment of the Pollock decision of 1896, and enshrining the dissenting opinion as the authoritative interpretation of the power of the Purse in the court’s Brushaber decision by the dissenting Pollock Judge turned Brushaber Chief Judge White. White would treat any tax on income as an indirect tax, and decided that’s all that the 16th Amendment authorized, codifying his 1896 dissent into the Constitution in 1913.  White used the 1794 Carriage Tax Act to claim a direct tax was a tax on an object whereas an indirect tax was a tax on use, effectively affording a broad power to tax “incomes” as long as the subject of the tax was the gain severed from the source rather than a tax on existing or ownership.  The absent clarity from the court enabled Congress to evade ever defining income itself subject to tax since 1916. 
  • This power of the purse exceeded that intended by many in the founding generation, as the Articles of Confederation did not authorize such centralized, federalized power to begin with, and the anti-federalists proved prescient in their warning against the bond-holding elite that packed the text-writing segments of the Constitutional Convention, as well detailed in Charles Beard’s Economic History of the Constitution. https://cdn.mises.org/11_1_6_0.pdf#:~:text=The%20Antifederalists'%20fundamental%20and%20most%20enduring%20objection,in%20nearly%20all%20of%20the%20Antifederalist%20writings.
  • As one of that generation, known only as Federal Farmer, forewarned: “The only semblance of a check is the negative power of not re-electing them. This, sir, is but a feeble barrier, when their personal interest, their ambition and avarice, come to be put in contrast with the happiness of the people. All checks founded on anything but self-love, will not avail.” 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief

I.  Schedule

      A.  Interview on World Apart RT https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7495641/interview-w-rt

      B.  Interview w/ Michael Malice https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7495633/michael-malice-interview

      C.   Interview on Duran https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7477013/live-w-duran 

II. The Evidence

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals