VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
December 21, 2024

This one is thanks to @FuzzyCreature :

I created a custom GPT with all 17,000 pages of the Weaponization of Government document that was just released.

You can use it yourself here: https://chatgpt.com/g/g-676718a7dd988191aff4125d419d1abd-weaponization-of-government-report-analyst

This is a long detailed list and will be posted in multiple parts due to its length.

"Abuse of Power: A Comprehensive List of Alleged Federal Crimes by Key Figures in Government and Society"

Introduction

The following comprehensive list details allegations of potential federal crimes committed by key figures across government, corporate, and other influential sectors. These individuals, including high-ranking officials, corporate executives, and policymakers, are alleged to have violated laws protecting the integrity of the United States' justice system, constitutional rights, and public trust. From obstruction of justice and suppression of free speech to mishandling classified information and fabricating intelligence, the alleged actions outlined below have far-reaching implications. Together, they paint a troubling picture of systemic abuse of power, lack of transparency, and an erosion of the principles of accountability and fairness. Each entry is meticulously detailed to provide clarity on the allegations, the crimes potentially committed, and the consequences these actions may have on American society and democracy.


1. David Weiss

Total Potential Penalty: 25 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Delaying Prosecution of Hunter Biden:

  • Incident: Allegedly slowed investigations and failed to bring timely charges against Hunter Biden for potential tax evasion and firearms violations despite evidence of wrongdoing.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States).
    • Explanation: As U.S. Attorney for Delaware, Weiss had the authority to pursue these charges but delayed and sought special counsel authority, which critics allege was a move to obscure inaction.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Obstruction of Justice:

  • Incident: Allegedly tampered with or blocked investigations into Hunter Biden’s financial dealings, including international activities with potential links to influence peddling.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (Tampering with a Witness, Victim, or an Informant).
    • Explanation: Weiss is accused of preventing investigators from pursuing key leads or interviewing witnesses who could implicate high-profile individuals.
    • Penalties: Up to 20 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: American taxpayers, who rely on impartial justice and accountability for federal crimes.
  • Impact: Undermined public trust in the Department of Justice (DOJ) by allegedly providing preferential treatment to a politically connected individual. This has fueled public perceptions of a two-tiered justice system, eroding confidence in fair law enforcement.

2. Lisa Monaco

Total Potential Penalty: 25 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What She Allegedly Did:

1. Mismanagement of DOJ Investigations:

  • Incident: Allegedly used her position as Deputy Attorney General to suppress or interfere with investigations into politically sensitive matters, including the Hunter Biden case.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States).
    • Explanation: Monaco is alleged to have coordinated or directed DOJ staff to stall or limit investigations involving politically connected individuals.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Obstruction of Justice:

  • Incident: Allegedly directed DOJ officials to withhold or obscure evidence during high-profile investigations.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1512 (Tampering with a Witness, Victim, or an Informant).
    • Explanation: Suppressing whistleblower testimony or documentation that could expose wrongdoing.
    • Penalties: Up to 20 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: Federal whistleblowers and the American public, whose faith in the justice system is compromised.
  • Impact: These actions allegedly prioritized political objectives over impartial enforcement of the law, further entrenching a culture of favoritism within the DOJ.

3. Hillary Clinton

Total Potential Penalty: 20 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What She Allegedly Did:

1. Mishandling Classified Information:

  • Incident: As Secretary of State, Clinton used a private email server to conduct official government business, which included transmitting classified information.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 793 (Gathering, Transmitting, or Losing Defense Information).
    • Explanation: Mishandling sensitive government communications, including classified intelligence, by storing it on an unsecured server, potentially exposing national secrets to unauthorized access.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Obstruction of Justice:

  • Incident: Allegedly directed the deletion of thousands of emails after they were subpoenaed during the investigation into her email practices.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (Destruction, Alteration, or Falsification of Records in Federal Investigations).
    • Explanation: Deleting or destroying emails to avoid scrutiny and potential evidence exposure.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: U.S. intelligence agencies and the American public, who were potentially exposed to security risks.
  • Impact: Compromised national security and eroded public trust in accountability for high-ranking officials.

4. Merrick Garland

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Interference in DOJ Investigations:

  • Incident: Allegedly influenced investigations into politically sensitive matters, including cases involving Hunter Biden and election-related inquiries.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1505 (Obstruction of Proceedings Before Departments, Agencies, and Committees).
    • Explanation: Actions or directives designed to limit or terminate investigations into politically charged matters.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Suppression of Whistleblower Testimony:

  • Incident: Prevented whistleblowers from testifying or retaliated against them for exposing misconduct.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights).
    • Explanation: Conspired to suppress testimony or punish individuals attempting to expose wrongdoing.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: DOJ whistleblowers and federal investigators stymied by suppressed testimony.
  • Impact: Damaged the credibility of the DOJ as a neutral enforcer of the law, furthering perceptions of a politically driven agenda.

5. Jen Easterly

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What She Allegedly Did:

1. Censorship of Political Speech:

  • Incident: Used her role as CISA director to coordinate with social media companies to suppress posts deemed "misinformation," including lawful speech.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights).
    • Explanation: Colluded with private entities to violate Americans’ First Amendment rights by suppressing lawful political speech.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Relocation of Censorship Operations:

  • Incident: Moved censorship activities to non-profits funded by CISA after federal lawsuits arose, in an attempt to evade legal scrutiny.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States).
    • Explanation: Shifted activities to external entities to circumvent legal restrictions and public accountability.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: Social media users and American citizens, whose rights to free speech were undermined.
  • Impact: Strengthened the narrative of governmental overreach and censorship, significantly damaging public trust in institutions.

6. Mark Zuckerberg

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Collusion with Federal Agencies to Suppress Political Speech:

  • Incident: Zuckerberg admitted that Facebook suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story following pressure from the FBI. This suppression took place during the 2020 election, under the guise of addressing potential “Russian disinformation.”
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights).
    • Explanation: Participated in an agreement with federal agencies to suppress free speech by demoting a news story on Facebook that was lawful and of significant public interest.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Providing False or Misleading Testimony to Congress:

  • Incident: Zuckerberg’s testimony regarding Facebook’s actions in content moderation contained inaccuracies or omissions about the extent of the government’s influence on Facebook policies.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements).
    • Explanation: Willfully provided misleading statements to Congress about Facebook’s role in suppressing lawful political discourse.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: Facebook users, the broader American public, and the democratic process.
  • Impact: Undermined public trust in free and fair elections by suppressing information critical to voters’ decision-making, further damaging trust in major tech platforms’ neutrality.

7. Hunter Biden

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Tax Evasion and Money Laundering:

  • Incident: Failed to report significant income derived from foreign business dealings, including funds received from entities in China and Ukraine, and structured transactions to avoid detection.
  • Specific Crime: 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (Attempt to Evade or Defeat Tax).
    • Explanation: Evaded paying taxes on income from overseas business deals by using shell corporations and false reporting.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000 per offense.

2. False Statements on Federal Firearms Application:

  • Incident: Provided false information on ATF Form 4473 to purchase a firearm, failing to disclose his history of drug abuse.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) (False Statements in Acquisition of Firearms).
    • Explanation: Lied about drug use while purchasing a firearm, violating federal law.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: The American taxpayer, law-abiding firearm purchasers, and financial institutions.
  • Impact: Eroded public confidence in the fairness of federal law enforcement and tax regulations, fueling concerns about unequal application of justice.

8. Andrew McCabe

Total Potential Penalty: 15 years imprisonment and $500,000 in fines

What He Allegedly Did:

1. Leaking Classified Information:

  • Incident: Allegedly leaked sensitive information about the FBI’s Clinton Foundation investigation to the media without authorization.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 793 (Gathering, Transmitting, or Losing Defense Information).
    • Explanation: Improperly shared classified or sensitive information with reporters to influence public perception of ongoing investigations.
    • Penalties: Up to 10 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

2. Lying to Federal Investigators:

  • Incident: Provided false statements under oath to the DOJ Inspector General regarding his role in the leaks.
  • Specific Crime: 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements).
    • Explanation: Misrepresented facts during an official investigation, obstructing accountability efforts.
    • Penalties: Up to 5 years imprisonment and fines up to $250,000.

Potential Victims and Impact:

  • Victims: FBI personnel, whistleblowers, and the American public.
  • Impact: Diminished trust in the FBI’s impartiality and fostered a perception of corruption within federal law enforcement.

End of part 1....

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
December 11, 2025
Kentucky State Rep. Sarah Stalker Explains the Shame She Feels About Being White!

With a special surprise ending! lol

00:08:15
December 11, 2025
MTG Struggle session

For those who missed it yesterday.

00:10:00
December 09, 2025
A better night of bowling…

Averaged 187 tonight. So feeling a little better.

I just need to figure out a way to dull the nagging pain of the shoulder bursitis.

00:00:31
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence

Sorry for the glare but the sky tonight is so pretty

post photo preview

Power is restored, BUT Im gonna have to replace a power pole, FOR SURE!!!! SMFH. Have to brace this one until I can put a new one in close to it. 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️. GUESS I found his CHRISTMAS PRESENT!!!!

post photo preview
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Week of December 12, 2025

I. INTRODUCTION

A.  Art of the Week

As the birds make their winter trip in synchronized form, they almost magically make the form of their species in live time in the air, captured in the moment by a photographer’s film, reminding us of the Creator’s noble design and winking at us in real time. 

B.  Recommendation of the Week

An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States by Charles Beard unmasked that many of the men at the Convention Hall in Philadelphia were not as enlightened and allied to the Founding generation as later history would tell the tale. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/187702.An_Economic_Interpretation_of_the_Constitution_of_the_United_States

C.  Wisdom of the Week

Affording politicians “a universal, unbounded permission” to take another’s liberty or property in the name of the public fisc will “when the expenses of the nation, by their ambition are grown enormous” inescapably “oppress and subject” the citizenry.” William Symmes. 

D.  Appearances

  • Dr. Bowden
    placeholder

E.  Best of the Board

  1. Birthright citizenship. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7341595/is-the-nationality-act-of-1940-the-proper-starting-point-for-analyzing-the-scope-of-subject-to-th
  2. Viva done w/ Candace. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516832/update-about-a-month-ago-i-asked-for-prayers-for-my-mom-since-we-were-going-to-get-an-update-on
  3. Curated content from @CCandent https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516486/title
  4. Massie: let’s leave NATO. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516236/massie-introduces-bill-to-get-us-out-of-nato-by-paul-dragu-the-new-american-representative-thom
  5. Nice ruling in PA. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516323/robertbarnes-well-at-least-there-are-still-a-few-judges-in-pa-that-follow-the-constitution-good-r

*Bonus: Personal hope. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7516832/update-about-a-month-ago-i-asked-for-prayers-for-my-mom-since-we-were-going-to-get-an-update-on

F.  Best Across the Internet

  • Disconnect from purpose.
    placeholder

II. THE EVIDENCE

A.   NEWS OF THE WEEK: The Library

  1. EU crosses Rubicon. https://x.com/PM_ViktorOrban/status/1999358779763183953?s=20
  2. Vaccines & chronic disease. https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/125
  3. Disney’s AI gamble. https://x.com/HedgieMarkets/status/1999170314580746623?s=20
  4. Lindell goes for Governor. https://x.com/realMikeLindell/status/1999191330829009327?s=20
  5. Honduran election dispute. https://x.com/SalvaPresidente/status/1998955182277722383?s=20

*Bonus: Foster kids helped. https://x.com/MAHA_Action/status/1999241337745670236?s=20

B.    DEEP DIVE: RUSSIA-US Reasons for Alliance

  1. Tucker: Russia-US natural allies. https://x.com/AFpost/status/1998968887724183834?s=20
  2. Russia: world’s richest resources. https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-top-10-countries-by-value-of-all-their-natural-resources/
  3. Russia: world’s largest country. https://x.com/World_Insights1/status/1999029803458965765?s=20
  4. Russia: world’s largest nuclear arsenal. https://www.icanw.org/nuclear_arsenals
  5. Russia’s GDP replaced Europe. https://x.com/IslanderWORLD/status/1978510171589513504?s=20

*Bonus: Russia’s traditional culture. https://x.com/MyLordBebo/status/1998812811171082739?s=20

C.   HOMEWORK: Cases in Controversy

  1. SCOTUS: Trump authority over bureaucracy. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-332_7lhn.pdf
  2. SCOTUS: campaign spending limits. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-621_q86b.pdf
  3. SCOTUS: sentencing the disabled. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-872_b07d.pdf
  4. SCOTUS: Covid immunity limits. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-180_8m59.pdf
  5. SCOTUS: Bondi defends Whitmer Fednapping convictions. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25-5249/387036/20251210183835177_Croft_Opp_12.10.pdf
  6. Courts extend special protection to Maryland Man. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/paula-xinis-grants-abrego-garcia-tro-block-rearrest.pdf
  7. Share Ryan v. Crenshaw. https://x.com/ShawnRyan762/status/1999554231842349564?s=20
  8. Pipe Bomber Patsy. https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1999541341466866022?s=20
  9. Big Tech contempt. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/epic-games-vs-apple-ninth-circuit-opinion.pdf
  10. Pentagon wins trans ban. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/dc-circuit-trans-soldier-ban-opinion.pdf
  11. Russia Euroclear Arbitration possibilities. https://share.google/FdKIPKgvLfEeJXsUz & https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaties/bit/3645/belgium-luxembourg---russian-federation-bit-1989-
  12. Doctor liability for patient’s drugs. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/oregon-supreme-court-cyclist-doctor-liability.pdf

*Bonus: Ferrari Tennessee tax case up in flames. https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a69556804/whistlindiesel-tennessee-allegations-ferrari-tax-evasion/

**Bonus: Class Action AI in Healthcare. https://www.fisherphillips.com/en/news-insights/new-class-action-targets-healthcare-ai-recordings.html

***Bonus: What does AI own? https://www.commonplace.org/p/matthew-b-crawford-ownership-of-the

III.  CLOSING ARGUMENT: Masterclass -- The Constitution Article I, The Power of the Purse

  • The first power of the purse the Constitution affords the legislative branch of government in Article I is the power to pay themselves, as section 6 of Article 1 provides: “The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the United States.” 
  • The second power of the purse is Article I's most controversial and most consequential: the power to tax and the power to borrow, or, colloquially, the power to “raise Revenue” in section 7. The mechanism for “raising revenue” shall be by legislation that “shall originate in the House” and then be concurred with by the Senate. The power finds explicit enumeration in Section 8: lay taxes; collect taxes; lay duties; collect duties; lay imposts; collect imposts; law excises; collect excises; pay debts; borrow money on credit of the US; coin Money; regulate the value of Money; regulate the value of foreign Coin; fix weights and measures; appropriate money to support Armies (capped at 2 years); provide and maintain a Navy; provide for arming the Militia; and the broad “necessary and proper” catchall in Section 8. The power of the purse finds further enumerated restrictions within Section 1 itself, though subsequent Constitutional provisions could further constrain and restrain the power of the Purse: section 8’s requirement that all “duties, imposts and excises” must be “uniform”; section 9’s prohibiting a tax on importation of people capped at $10 per person; prohibiting any tax that constitutes a bill of attainder or ex post facto law; no direct tax unless apportioned amongst the states; no tax on exports; no port-preferential tax; and no money spent that is not “in consequence of appropriations made by law”. 
  • The Sixteenth Amendment clarified one key aspect of the power of the Purse: enumerating Congress “power to tax” including the power to “law and collect taxes on incomes” regardless of “whatever source derived” without requiring apportionment. This removal-of-the-source rule was later interpreted to be a Congressional reversal by Constitutional Amendment of the Pollock decision of 1896, and enshrining the dissenting opinion as the authoritative interpretation of the power of the Purse in the court’s Brushaber decision by the dissenting Pollock Judge turned Brushaber Chief Judge White. White would treat any tax on income as an indirect tax, and decided that’s all that the 16th Amendment authorized, codifying his 1896 dissent into the Constitution in 1913.  White used the 1794 Carriage Tax Act to claim a direct tax was a tax on an object whereas an indirect tax was a tax on use, effectively affording a broad power to tax “incomes” as long as the subject of the tax was the gain severed from the source rather than a tax on existing or ownership.  The absent clarity from the court enabled Congress to evade ever defining income itself subject to tax since 1916. 
  • This power of the purse exceeded that intended by many in the founding generation, as the Articles of Confederation did not authorize such centralized, federalized power to begin with, and the anti-federalists proved prescient in their warning against the bond-holding elite that packed the text-writing segments of the Constitutional Convention, as well detailed in Charles Beard’s Economic History of the Constitution. https://cdn.mises.org/11_1_6_0.pdf#:~:text=The%20Antifederalists'%20fundamental%20and%20most%20enduring%20objection,in%20nearly%20all%20of%20the%20Antifederalist%20writings.
  • As one of that generation, known only as Federal Farmer, forewarned: “The only semblance of a check is the negative power of not re-electing them. This, sir, is but a feeble barrier, when their personal interest, their ambition and avarice, come to be put in contrast with the happiness of the people. All checks founded on anything but self-love, will not avail.” 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief

I.  Schedule

      A.  Interview on World Apart RT https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7495641/interview-w-rt

      B.  Interview w/ Michael Malice https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7495633/michael-malice-interview

      C.   Interview on Duran https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7477013/live-w-duran 

II. The Evidence

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Weekend of November 21, 2025

I.    INTRODUCTION

A. Art of the Day

We the People. It stands out above all in the scribed parchment inside the glass-encased shield inside the Rotunda of Congress with three words bigger than the rest: We The People. Penned on a single sheet of animal skin by Jacob Shallus, it stands out as the Great Charter of American liberty, the profound experiment in self-government, and still stands today as the oldest and shortest written constitution of any major government in the world today. Those words stand out above the rest, written in flowing letters outsized to the text, to remind the world upon what power our government sits: We the People.

B. Wisdom of the Day

“Monopoly is a great enemy” and a “wretched spirit” which poses a greater threat to the free market than as it prevents free enterprise from self-defense. Adam Smith.

C. Cultural Recommendation

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution tells the tale of what the true founders – the generation that birthed freedom on this continent – thought as they argued the merits of this new document. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7841680-ratification

D. Appearances

II.                         THE EVIDENCE

 *Note: A reminder — links are NOT endorsements of the ideas contained therein. The Library is big, and it mostly consists of ideas I do not personally share.  

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals