VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
December 21, 2024

Lets go for one more tonight:

I created a custom GPT with all 17,000 pages of the Weaponization of Government document that was just released.

You can use it yourself here: https://chatgpt.com/g/g-676718a7dd988191aff4125d419d1abd-weaponization-of-government-report-analyst

I asked it an interesting question. What do you think about the answer?

Creating a detailed timeline based on the comprehensive data across these documents is a multi-step process. Below is a high-level outline of how the timeline unfolds based on documented events and activities related to the weaponization of government.


Detailed Timeline of Events: Weaponization of Government


2016

  • July 5, 2016: FBI Director James Comey holds a press conference outlining the Bureau’s findings regarding Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server. His public declaration to not recommend charges, traditionally a decision left to prosecutors, begins raising internal concerns about deviations from procedural norms.
  • Post-2016: Internal FBI debates ensue on whether Comey's statements compromised Bureau objectivity. Whistleblower testimony later highlights a gradual erosion of fact-finding integrity.

2019

  • October 2019: FBI formally takes possession of a laptop allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden. Internal discussions begin within the Bureau regarding its potential implications for the upcoming 2020 election. These discussions later form the foundation of the "prebunking" strategy for disinformation.
  • November 2019: DOJ opens a tax investigation into Hunter Biden that expands into influence peddling allegations. The scope includes examining emails on the laptop that reference dealings with foreign entities.

2020: Critical Year of Election Influence

  • January 2020: The FBI begins framing warnings about potential Russian election interference. Meetings with social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter start under the pretext of addressing potential cyber threats.

  • Summer 2020:

    • June 2020: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) partners with Stanford University’s Internet Observatory to establish the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP). This is explicitly stated to be "at the request of" DHS/CISA. The goal is to monitor online narratives and work with Big Tech to flag content.
    • July 15, 2020: Facebook internal messages reveal plans to align its moderation practices with FBI-provided guidance, with an employee noting, "We’ve been meeting for years with USG [U.S. Government] to plan for [election influence]".
  • Fall 2020:

    • September 2020: In an FBI-led meeting with Twitter, concerns about a "hack-and-leak" operation related to Hunter Biden are raised. Whistleblowers later testify that FBI officials indirectly implied such narratives could emerge from Russian disinformation.
    • October 14, 2020: The New York Post publishes a story detailing alleged corruption by Hunter Biden based on emails from the laptop. Facebook and Twitter suppress the story within hours of publication. Twitter temporarily locks the Post’s account for violating its newly minted hacked materials policy.
    • October 19, 2020: More than 50 former intelligence officials sign a letter claiming the laptop story has "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation." Evidence later reveals that these signatories acted without direct evidence.

2021: Institutional Entrenchment

  • January 2021: CISA shifts its focus from cybersecurity to domestic information control. This includes efforts to counteract “malinformation,” encompassing accurate but politically sensitive narratives.
  • May 2021: Federal grant documentation shows the National Science Foundation (NSF) funds AI projects aimed at combating online “disinformation.” These projects focus on automating content flagging at scale.

2022: Continued Expansion

  • March 2022: Internal CISA communications reveal plans for an anti-misinformation rapid response team. This team’s proposed function includes physical deployments to key areas during crises.
  • May 2022: Whistleblowers within the FBI report retaliatory actions against agents who questioned the Bureau's approach to security clearance reviews and its targeting of politically inconvenient narratives.
  • November 2022: Lawsuits filed by Missouri and Louisiana uncover internal communications between government agencies and Big Tech detailing regular coordination to moderate content deemed “problematic”.

2023: Legislative Oversight and Whistleblower Revelations

  • February 9, 2023: The Select Subcommittee holds its first hearing, exposing how FBI whistleblowers were suspended without pay and targeted for opposing internal practices.
  • June 26, 2023: A Subcommittee report, The Weaponization of CISA, details how CISA outsourced its misinformation operations to a non-profit, avoiding direct accountability.
  • July 20, 2023: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. testifies before the Subcommittee, describing how private citizens and journalists faced suppression for expressing dissent.

2024: Automation of Censorship

  • February 5, 2024: Subcommittee publishes a report on the NSF’s funding of AI-powered censorship tools. These tools enable mass-scale flagging and suppression of content under the guise of combating “misinformation”.
  • May 1, 2024: Hearings investigate how executive agencies pressured platforms to moderate content. Facebook executives testify about policy changes directly resulting from government influence.
  • September 25, 2024: Subcommittee hearings focus on FBI misuse of its security clearance process to suppress whistleblowers. Testimonies highlight the systemic nature of retaliatory practices within the Bureau.

Observations

1. Acceleration in 2020:

  • The year 2020 saw the most concentrated activity, coinciding with the presidential election. Pre-election narratives around Russian interference were used as a foundation to suppress politically damaging stories.

2. Broadening Scope (2021–2024):

  • After 2020, the focus shifted from electoral influence to broader narratives like COVID-19 and other political controversies. CISA and NSF emerged as key players in institutionalizing these practices.

3. Retaliation and Whistleblowers:

  • Across the timeline, whistleblowers repeatedly faced retaliation. This highlighted a systematic effort to prevent dissent within government agencies.

4. Current State:

  • As of late 2024, Subcommittee findings have forced some operational shifts but have not dismantled the institutional framework that enabled such activities.

This timeline details a systemic evolution of alleged government overreach, charting specific instances of suppression, whistleblower retaliation, and institutional mechanisms driving this effort.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Tom Homan

Here's the breakdown!

00:13:34
October 11, 2025
Trans Scandal

This is a banger of a vlawg. Enjoy!

00:10:26
October 10, 2025
Vance Boelter UPDATE

Here it is.

Divorce

00:09:03
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Questions for Bourbon w/ Barnes: Columbus Day, 2025

Ask in replies and answering LIVE act 9ish eastern tonight...

post photo preview

Happy Birthday in heaven Charlie. Wear red for Charlie today.

post photo preview
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Friday, October 10, 2025

I.   INTRODUCTION

A. Art of the Day

The symmetry of shape, the mirrored reflections off the still water, the delights of the desert each mirror and balance each other in this photograph that reminds me of a still painting, attracting introspective thought by getting lost in its perspective of nature meets man.

B. Wisdom of the Day

“Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding.” Albert Einstein.

C. Cultural Recommendation

In the Deep State themed films, shows, and book, a personal favorite is Rubicon. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1389371/

D. Appearances

 

*Note: A reminder — links are NOT endorsements of the ideas contained therein. The Library is big, and it mostly consists of ideas I do not personally share.  

 

II. THE EVIDENCE

A.   Daily News of Interest

*Bonus: Dolly not dead. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15174635/Dolly-Parton-breaks-silence-health-condition-sister-asked-prayers-country-singer.html

B.    Daily Deep Dive: Gaza Peace

*Bonus: Before and after Hamas. https://martindicaro.substack.com/p/before-and-after-hamas

C. Cases of Consequence

*Bonus: Mail in ballots at SCOTUS. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-568_7l48.pdf

III.   CLOSING ARGUMENT: Free Speech Rights on Campus

  • State universities are state actors, and as such, they are subject to the restraints imposed by the Constitution and by concomitant state laws in many jurisdictions. We start with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
  • “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech…or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” These three coequal protections cover each aspect of speech – speech itself; the assembly often necessary to effectuate speech; and the petitioning process required to make it meaningful in many instances. As related to the university, the first two predominate.
  • As I had reason to remind myself recently, many state laws go further. Take for example Tennessee Code 49-7-2405. Tennessee law reinforces students “right to free speech” enforced through institutions affording students “the broadest latitude to a speak any issue” with a specific prohibition that it “not to be suppressed because the ideas put forth are through by some or even by most members of the community to be offensive, immoral, indecent, disagreeable, radical or wrongheaded.” In other words, no so-called hate speech exception. In the organizational context, the law specifically prohibits an school to “deny student activity fee funding to a student organization based on the viewpoints” of that organization. The only prohibited conduct is harassment, defined as “unwelcome conduct directed toward a person that is discriminatory on a basis prohibited by federal, state or local law, and that is so severe, pervasive and objectively offensive that it effectively bars the victim’s access to an educational opportunity or benefit.”
  • The principal Supreme Court case on the subject derives from the SDS movement in the 1960 and 1970s on college campuses – the Students for a Democratic Society. As the Supreme Court reiterated: “the vigilant protection of constitutional freedoms is nowhere more vital than in the community of American schools.” Academic freedom is freedom of speech for students and the associational rights embodied therein with the right to peaceably assemble. Indeed, the right to organize on campus derives from the marriage of those three First Amendment freedoms forementioned – the freedom of association is “implicit in the freedoms of speech, assembly and petition.”
  • As the High Court held in Healy: “There can be no doubt that denial of official recognition, without justification, to college organizations burdens or abridges that associational right.”  As a disfavored “prior restraint” on student’s future speech, “a heavy burden rests on the college to demonstrate the appropriateness of the action” and that appropriateness is limited to “preventing disruption on campus” from violent conduct, not a heckler’s veto.
  • There is no place more essential to the exchange of ideas, robust debate, and the freedom of speech than a college campus in the very origination of ideas for many people during their intellectual coming of age. Protecting First Amendment freedoms for organizations like Turning Point USA thus remains essential to respecting the legacy of Charlie Kirk and enforcing the law of the land in our foundational formational documents of the very First Amendment in our rightly famed Bill of Rights. 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Weekend Edition, Friday, October 3, 2025

I.   INTRODUCTION

A. Art of the Day

Conversations in the café, the coffee house, or the local diner. A great way to spend any afternoon, often engaged in dialogue, discussion or debate over any range of subjects, as the course of the conversation only constricted by the imagination and intelligence of its conversant compatriots, a deeply human exploration and expression of understanding the world as is and as it can be.

B. Wisdom of the Day

“We need to trim the fat between their brains as much as around their waistline.” Colonel Macgregor on needed military reforms.

C. Cultural Recommendation

The Sandbaggers. Uncloaking the nature of cover operations. Recommended by a board member. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077078/

D. Appearances

 

 *Note: A reminder — links are NOT endorsements of the ideas contained therein. The Library is big, and it mostly consists of ideas I do not personally share.  

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Wednesday, October 1, 2025

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Art of the Day 

Venezia. The city of seduction and romance, of masked balls and cinematic backdrops, where quiet back-alley restaurants and boutique shops await for you to uncover and discover, as the magic of this modern-day Atlantis invites at every turn. Arrive at the airport to an awaiting long wooden boat across the water to the city dancing with the sea, and dance amidst the history and beauty of ancient Cathedrals, in handmade shoes from the world’s greatest shoemakers. My favorite city to visit.  

B. Wisdom of the Day

“War does not determine who is right – only who is left.” Bertrand Russell.

C. Cultural Recommendation

Bitter Fruit: history of American interventions in creating the Banana Republics of our southern neighbors. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/102729.Bitter_Fruit?

 

 *Note: A reminder — links below are NOT endorsements of the ideas contained therein. The Library is big, and it often consists of ideas I do not personally share.  

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals