I. INTRODUCTION
I posted this to Twitter as well:
I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO BE CONFUSED ON THIS: I have no prior knowledge or understanding of the DoD directive - just trying to understand what people are worried about and DM'ing me about.
A lot of people have been coming to me asking about the "new" directive from the DoD regarding authorization to use "lethal force" on civilians. They are citing what they believe is a new directive in screenshot 1 - the authorization to use lethal force.
Being ignorant on the subject, my first reaction was to think that the DoD always has authorization to use "lethal force" in the event of unrest, depending on the nature of the unrest / proximity of threat.
Am I wrong in concluding that this wording has always been in these DoD directives? Just googling some older ones, and the same phraseology is there (screenshots 2 and 3). But I'm not sure if they are the same directive covering the same subject matter. Links in replies.
Does this directive actually do anything new, or is it just coming to people's awareness for the first time?
I know what Barnes thinks - that it is being misunderstood. Just trying to make sure I understand / check my own analysis.
Thoughts?
I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Art of the Week
B. Recommendation of the Week
C. Wisdom of the Week
D. Appearances
II. THE EVIDENCE
A. Barnes Library: Curated Weekly Articles of Interest
*Bonus: Bald eagle rescued. https://abc7ny.com/post/nypd-officers-describe-rare-rescue-trapped-american-bald-eagle-icy-hudson-river-nyc/18616678/
B. Best of the Board: Five Fantastic Posts of the Week
*Bonus: Bondi mockery. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7703469/spotted-all-over-washington-dc-while-i-normally-don-t-share-the-political-views-of-people-in-dc
**Bonus: Weekly Wisdom. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7704649/the-intersection-of-politics-youtube-commentary-and-critical-traffic-infrastructure-https-you
C. Homework: Cases of the Week for Sunday
*Lobbyist disclosure laws. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/2/chapter-26
**Lobbying disclosure guidelines. https://www.senate.gov/legislative/resources/pdf/S1guidance.pdf
***Transanity in Canada. https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7704549/tribunal-ruling-out-of-british-columbia-canada
III. CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass Series — Article I, Tariffs
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Art of the Week
B. Recommendation of the Week
C. Wisdom of the Week
D. Appearances
II. THE EVIDENCE
A reminder: links are NOT endorsements of the authors or their interpretation of events, but intended to expand our library of understanding as well as expose ideas of distinct perspective to our own.
A. Barnes Library: Ten of the Top Curated Weekly Articles
B. Homework: Cases of the Week for Sunday
*Bonus: Livenation Ticketmaster Antitrust https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/music/music-industry-news/live-nation-doj-lawsuit-after-gail-slater-resignation-1236504011/
**Bonus: NCAAF eligibility suit. https://www.knoxnews.com/picture-gallery/sports/college/university-of-tennessee/football/2026/02/13/joey-aguilar-eligibility-hearing-tennessee-vs-ncaa/88659399007/
***Bonus: AI plagiarism win. https://www.newsday.com/long-island/education/adelphi-university-ai-plagiarism-lawsuit-oh07enyz
C. Best of the Board: Ten of the Top Posts
III. CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass Series — Article I, Elections