VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
April 10, 2023

Per a request by @MightyPaix here is the commentary I posted during the Sunday lifestream, providing some background on the AK-47 and AR-15. This post is rearranged slightly for easier reading, and I added some more relevant info.

1) What is an AK-47?
The original AK-47 was developed by Mikhail Kalashnikov (who was a tank commander during the war) and was called the Avtomat Kalashnikova 1947 (so automatic Kalashnikov 1947). At that time new weapons were often designated by the year of approval and this is the reason for the "47." The design was updated soon after, and most rifles built in the Soviet Union were actually the updated AKM. Funny enough, they didn't build very many of the actual AK-47.

The design was influenced by the German StG 44 and both rifles appear similar enough that StG 44s are often mistaken for AK-47s in historical photos. Tip: if the photo is of Russians during WWII, they're carrying captured German rifles. Also, Brad Pitt carries one in the movie Fury.

2) Design and patents
Just like with the famous AR-15, the patents on the operating mechanism expired forever ago therefore lots of companies make their own versions of both these rifles, including in the US. They are often referred to as "AK" (instead of "AK-47" ) because these modern rifles use the same essential mechanism but aren't historical reproductions of the actual rifle. In the industry this is called a "pattern" so they are "AK pattern rifles."

AK pattern rifles are popular with some gun owners due to the increased reliability of the gas-piston system over the direct-impingement system used in the AR pattern.

3) Ammunition
The rifle was designed to fire 7.62x39mm ammunition (basically a low powered .30 caliber) and that's still the most common in civilian use. The Russian military swtiched to a new cartridge (5.45x39mm) and a new version of the rifle, designated the AK-74. Current AK rifles are available for the 7.62x39mm cartridge, the US standard 5.56x45mm NATO (like the AR-15), as well as other cartridges.

The 7.62x39mm round is very tapered, so ejection is much more reliable than the AR. The extreme curve of the magazine is created by the large taper of the cartridges. Ammunition is cheap and you can even buy steel-cased ammo from Russia (or, you could before the sanctions).

The 7.62x39mm is also more powerful than the 5.56x45mm NATO round of the AR. For reference, here are some general approximations:
.30-06 (US M1 Garand rifle, WWII) - 3,900 joules of kinetic energy
7.62x51mm NATO (US M14 rifle) - 3,400 joules
7.62x39mm (AK-47, AKM) - 2,200 joules
5.56x45mm NATO (US M16, AR-15) - 1,800 joules
These numbers vary widely based on barrel length, cartridge loading, etc. But you get the point - the scary AR is firing a cartridge less than half as powerful as the standard for WWII.

4) Legality
The legality of both types are the same, as they are currently sold in the US market. Just like the AR rifles, civilian versions of the AK are semi-auto only unless you have a special license.

"Assault weapon" bans include all of the AK pattern rifles in their list of guns to ban, and legally they are treated the same as an AR-15. From a practical legal standpoint, the only difference between the two is the standard AK round isn't commonly manufactured in the US so it's easier to cut off the ammo supply to the public by banning ammunition imports.

Keep in mind there are other rifle design patterns so not all rifles that fire these cartridges are AK or AR type rifles. For example, H&K makes a popular line of rifles that use the same magazines as the AR but are not AR rifles - although they have the same mounting rails so they can carry the same accessories. Every scary black rifle isn't an AR.

If you want to learn more, pick up a copy of The Gun by C.J. Chivers, which is about the development of the AK-47 but also discusses the development of the M16 (the military designation for the full-auto version of the AR-15).

(Note for future arguments: firearm ballistics is one of the most contentious subjects on earth, made worse by the fact that it's not really legal to test guns by shooting people. Take everything said by everyone, including me, with a grain of salt).

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Charlie, the Cuban tree frog

He’s getting nice and fat!

00:01:01
Cynthia West Full Interview

Here it is for your viewing pleasure.

00:43:40
Summary of Cynthia West interview

I put together 6 highlights from the interview the Massie "accuser" gave.

I put "accuser" in quotes because it's ultimately not even clear what she's accusing Massie of.

He is mere a witness in her ethics complaint for retaliatory dismissal after working for 6 weeks for Spartz before getting fired.

The entire situation is a total cluster-hit-piece.

West says she had a relationship with Massie.

That they took a political trip to South Africa.

That he got her a job in DC.

That she got fired after 6 weeks.

That before gettin fired, she broke up with Massie.

She claims Massie offered her $5,000 a undeclared "cow money" to silence her.

That she has been offered $60,000 as a settlement but won't accept because it requires her to sign an NDA (absolutely standard for settlements).

I have been going at it with the usual suspects of TWS sycophants - Shawn Farash,. Will Chamberlain, Misfit Patriot - on X.

It is really discouraging to see people being so dishonest, so intellectually...

00:07:25
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Questions for Bourbon w/ Barnes: Thursday, May 14, 2026

Ask in replies and answering live at 9ish easter tonight...

"EXPERTS" said so. 🤷‍♂️🤣😂🤣😂🤣

post photo preview
post photo preview
post photo preview
The Barnes Brief: Thursday, May 14, 2026

Art of the Day 

  • This abstraction captures something more of the symphonic spirit in the seamless synethsis of function and feel, utility and aesthetic, that is my favorite place in my hometown — the Walnut Street Bridge, whose blue beams and wooden planks cross the Tennessee River, and whose path I took each day to work as a young lawyer for a public interest law clinic defending the victims of abuse be they parents or banks. The feeling of precision integrated into nature, crossing it, overcoming it, and experiencing it at the same time, this local artist best captures the sense of the Birdge as I fondly remember it, expressed in its geometric shape, friendly colors, and textured echo of memory past. 
Wisdom of the Day
  • “The gentleman understands what is right, whereas the petty man understands profit.” Confucius. 
Appearances
  • LIVE w/ Baris 
    placeholder
  • LIVE w/ Daniel Davis
  • LIVE w/ Shannon Joy
    placeholder
  • LIVE w/ Stanislav
Barnes Library
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Daily Briefer Barnes Brief: Tuesday, May 12, 2026
  • Art of the Day 
Jazz. Soulful, spiritual, and celebratory at the same time as the musucial, mastroes of innovation and improvisation take us some place deep, real, and hopeful at the same time. Freedom distilled in a trumpet’s note, a pianist's key, a bassist’s chord, uncovered in the mind, expressesd through the soul, manifested into sound. A most American creation. 
 
  • Board Post of Note
 
  • Appearances
 
LIVE w/ Baris 
placeholder
 
LIVE w/ Daniel Davis 
 
  • Cultural Recommendation
A fun show with lessons for today.   https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12637874/
 
  • Economics
Currency future?
 
  • Politics
 
  • Law
Stack the court? Virginia as forewarning
 
  • World

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Weekend Barnes Brief: Friday, May 8, 2026
 
I. THE INTRODUCTION
 
A. Art of the Week
  • Venezia. The Atlantis-like ancient city with its bridges over canals, long boats mastered by the gondolier, the city whose balls made masquarade masks famous, where artisans of show-making spend a whole day to make a single show of artistic wonderment, a hidden restaurant in a corner alley uncovers the best Italian cuisine, and the city whispers of its centuries of stories from its cathedrals and water-hugging mansions of Casanova’s fame. 
 
B. Wisdom of the Week
  • You’re never out of the race. 
 
C. Cultural Recommendation of the Week
 
D. Appearances
 
 
 
II. THE EVIDENCE
 
A. Barnes Library: Weekly Curated Articles
 
 
B. Homework: Sunday Show Cases
  1. Malpractice. https://www.foxnews.com/us/iowa-woman-died-hernia-repair-nurses-dismissed-painful-post-surgery-symptoms-lawsuit
  2. Gates fake meat goes to court. https://texasagriculture.gov/News-Events/Article/10760/Opinion-Fake-Meat-Real-Trouble-Texas-Won-t-Bow-to-Billionaires-or-Bureaucrats
  3. DOJ sues Commierado for 2A.https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1439591/dl
  4. DOJ promises action against Big Ag. https://www.fooddive.com/news/beef-prices-trump-antitrust-doj-investigation/819331/
  5. Democrat raided. https://courthousenews.com/fbi-raids-democratic-virginia-state-senators-office/
  6. Insider trading indictment. https://www.justice.gov/d9/2026-05/usa_v._fejal_et_al_-_indictment.pdf
  7. Insider trading investigation https://seekingalpha.com/news/4588393-doj-probes-26b-in-war-linked-oil-trades---report
  8. Pay for play investigations https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-pardon-recipients-democrats-congressional-investigation-pay-to-play/
  9. EU: must allow welfare for migrants. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/kh-inps-cjeu-judgment.pdf
  10. DEI may lose, even in Twin Cities. https://courthousenews.com/minneapolis-public-schools-struggles-in-trump-suit-over-dei-policy/
  11. China spies on trial. https://courthousenews.com/feds-describe-global-network-of-chinese-police-stations-at-nyc-spy-trial-opening/
  12. Tiger’s DUI: Implied Consent Constitutionality Questions. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1401&context=elj
 
C. Deep Dive: The Economy
  1. Stock Market & Commodities: 
  2. AI Bubble & Capital Shift
  3. Housing
  4. Gold’s future. https://substack.com/inbox/post/196409142
  5. Inflation expectations. https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/inflation-expectations-jump-3-year-high-financial-pessimism-surges-ny-fed-survey
 
D.  Best of the Board
 
III. THE CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass -- The 30,000 Cap
 
  • Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 provides: “The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative.”  Interpretations clash: was this intended to impose a cap on the number of people a member of the House could represent, or the number of Representatives that could ever be in the House? Equally, who can enforce the rights of Section 2 as applied to Representatives?
  • Congress capped the number of representatives by the Permanent Apportionment Act of June 18, 1929, and has not changed it since. A 1941 federal law provided the means to assign seats after the Census. States contested this when it lost a seat after the 1990 census due to this cap.  The Supreme Court acknowledged this was not a question submitted exclusively to the Legislative branch as a “political question” beyond its jurisdiction to resolve. Thus, the question turns to the import and intent of the 30,000 rule — is it a cap on the number of representatives or is it a ceiling on the number of people represented?
  • The phraseology can be read either way — that the restaint is on the “number of” Representatives in a ratio to the population rather than the population size represented by the District; or that the ratio intends a cap on the number of people represented by each representative. Linguistically, the former argument holds more sway; historically and philosophically, the latter argument proffers more persuasive evidence.
  • If we see it as sufficiently ambigious to turn to the Constitutional record, we find that the ratio of the house to the population was intended to be close to the people at a size no more than 30,000 people, reflected in the papers of the Founding Fathers themselves.
  • Indeed, the controversy over this language almost sunk the Constitution itself, despite the supporters arguing in Federalist Papers throughout that this was a minimum of people to be represented not merely a cap on the number of representatives in the House. So much so, that the very first amendment ever proposed was to clarify this point: that the minimum number of representatives must be proportional to the population in a strict ratio. Due to an editing error as passed by Congress, the amendment never passed, though mostly it faded as the Founding generation protected the intended ratio in fact.
  • The best plaintiff to seek such a relief would likely be a state without representation due to the absence of this maximum number of people per representative, given the prior case-law on the subject, or, of course, Congress itself could remedy the problem all by itself. 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals