VivaBarnesLaw
Politics • Culture • News
This is the VivaBarnesLaw Community.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Polylogism - The Root of America's Divisiveness, Decline and Destruction

History is repeating itself before our eyes.. The widespread controversy surrounding President Joe Biden's Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson as a "black woman" recalls the editorial in The Washington Times, “A Judge Too Far,” concerning President Obama’s earlier nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court which perceptively observed:

“Judge Sotomayor seems to think that inherent racial and sexual differences are not simply quirks of genetics, but make some better than others. Consider her 2002 speech at the University of California-Berkeley School of Law:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” she said. “I simply do not know exactly what that difference will be in my judging. But I accept there will be some based on my gender and my Latina heritage.”

“She also accepted as potentially valid the idea that the “different perspectives” of “men and women of color” are due to “basic differences in logic in reasoning” due to “inherent physiological or cultural differences.”

The brilliant Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises, regarded as the greatest economist of the 20th Century, discussed this Marxist nonsense in his magnum opus, Human Action, under the category of polylogism. https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/657

This is the bogus idea that the logical structure of the mind is different based on one’s class, race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, sexual preference, etc.
https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/660

This skewed Marxist concept lies at the root of all “politically correct” notions of cultural relativism and multiculturalism fashionable in academia, the elite media, and critical race and legal theory circles today.

And if President Biden has his way, upon the highest court in the land.

This is more than the widely-accepted idea that our various life experiences shape our world view, or influence our value judgments in making ethical and moral decisions.

Again, polylogism specifically holds that the logical structure of the mind is different based on one’s class, race, nationality, gender, sexual preference, etc. There is no objective reality independent from these fixed determinative factors of causality.

The notion of a Constitutionally-driven independent judicial temperament or impartiality becomes impossible.

All we have left is “sociological jurisprudence” which was (is) an attempt to get away as far as possible from the Framers’ original intent of the Constitution, and to adopt the doctrine of “the Living Constitution” shaped by socioeconomic causal factors.

It was one of the bogus concepts to come out of the so-called Progressive Era over a hundred years ago and has eroded our legal system in ways beyond belief.

Another way to look at it, it’s the old Marxist concept of “the sociology of knowledge” applied to law and public policy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociology_of_knowledge

Marxism as a rationale for state aggrandizement and empire (as in the former Soviet Union) may be dead but as an ideological prop it is very much alive in such widely-accepted notions as multiculturalism, “cultural imperialism,” sociological jurisprudence, and environmentalism.

There is much more to this fight than whether Ketanji Brown Jackson is confirmed.

Her nomination is a key battle in the on-going Culture War which lies at the heart and survival of what America is all about.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Absolute classic!

Warning: swearing alert!

There are bad words in this towards the end. But it’s absolutely hilarious.

The caption of the video was “trying to discuss anything on Twitter” and it is so on point, I laughed harder every time I watch it.

00:02:32
This is why Kyle Seraphin was put on leave

We watched the video today. It was the first time I saw it.

Mind blowing.

Full Lavrentiy Beria "show me the man and I will show you the crime".

00:03:40
L Louise Lucas

FBI Raid On "Top Virginia State Senator" Reveals Utter Democrat Hypocrisy!

00:07:38
February 17, 2024
Appearance on Richard Syrette

I did a quick hit on Richard Syrette yesterday. Gotta keep Canadians apprised of the U.S. madness.

Appearance on Richard Syrette
The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023

Closing Argument: Birthright citizenship is deeply American, and wholly Constitutional.

The Barnes Brief, Podcast Format: Monday, July 17, 2023
Declaration of Independence

Audio podcast style.

Declaration of Independence
Live w/ Jim Webb
Weekend Debate: Term Limits

Share your thoughts below.

Pros: Limit the permanent political class growing into an aristocracy of elites whose incumbency status and power-holding position affords them an institutional edge over competitors, encouraging a gerontocracy of lifelong politicians, disconnected from the real world of everyday economics and more likely to be embedded into a parasitic government-driven, power-access oriented system that empowers corrupt elites at the expense of the people.

Cons: In contemporary government, the real consequence of term-limiting the Thomas Massies of the world is to empower the permanent state, empowering bureaucracy over democracy, in lobbyists, career staffers, and the ever-expanding bureaucratic state, like a show of Yes Minister, married to the corrupting effect of donor class gatekeeping in the real world of modern elections driven by television expense ever consuming larger and larger shares of campaign exploding budgets to reach the ever growing number of voters they...

Meanwhile, in Canada

Canadian government-subsidized propaganda outlet bent on minimizing and demonizing the Alberta separatist movement accuses Russia and America of covert and overt foreign interference to amplify Alberta separatist movement.

Yup.

It’s astonishing that so many people don’t see it for what it is.

Link https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/russia-and-u-s-amplifying-alberta-separatist-narratives-to-stoke-division-distrust-report-9.7189604

post photo preview
The Weekend Barnes Brief: Friday, May 8, 2026
 
I. THE INTRODUCTION
 
A. Art of the Week
  • Venezia. The Atlantis-like ancient city with its bridges over canals, long boats mastered by the gondolier, the city whose balls made masquarade masks famous, where artisans of show-making spend a whole day to make a single show of artistic wonderment, a hidden restaurant in a corner alley uncovers the best Italian cuisine, and the city whispers of its centuries of stories from its cathedrals and water-hugging mansions of Casanova’s fame. 
 
B. Wisdom of the Week
  • You’re never out of the race. 
 
C. Cultural Recommendation of the Week
 
D. Appearances
 
 
 
II. THE EVIDENCE
 
A. Barnes Library: Weekly Curated Articles
 
 
B. Homework: Sunday Show Cases
  1. Malpractice. https://www.foxnews.com/us/iowa-woman-died-hernia-repair-nurses-dismissed-painful-post-surgery-symptoms-lawsuit
  2. Gates fake meat goes to court. https://texasagriculture.gov/News-Events/Article/10760/Opinion-Fake-Meat-Real-Trouble-Texas-Won-t-Bow-to-Billionaires-or-Bureaucrats
  3. DOJ sues Commierado for 2A.https://www.justice.gov/crt/media/1439591/dl
  4. DOJ promises action against Big Ag. https://www.fooddive.com/news/beef-prices-trump-antitrust-doj-investigation/819331/
  5. Democrat raided. https://courthousenews.com/fbi-raids-democratic-virginia-state-senators-office/
  6. Insider trading indictment. https://www.justice.gov/d9/2026-05/usa_v._fejal_et_al_-_indictment.pdf
  7. Insider trading investigation https://seekingalpha.com/news/4588393-doj-probes-26b-in-war-linked-oil-trades---report
  8. Pay for play investigations https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-pardon-recipients-democrats-congressional-investigation-pay-to-play/
  9. EU: must allow welfare for migrants. https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/kh-inps-cjeu-judgment.pdf
  10. DEI may lose, even in Twin Cities. https://courthousenews.com/minneapolis-public-schools-struggles-in-trump-suit-over-dei-policy/
  11. China spies on trial. https://courthousenews.com/feds-describe-global-network-of-chinese-police-stations-at-nyc-spy-trial-opening/
  12. Tiger’s DUI: Implied Consent Constitutionality Questions. https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1401&context=elj
 
C. Deep Dive: The Economy
  1. Stock Market & Commodities: 
  2. AI Bubble & Capital Shift
  3. Housing
  4. Gold’s future. https://substack.com/inbox/post/196409142
  5. Inflation expectations. https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/inflation-expectations-jump-3-year-high-financial-pessimism-surges-ny-fed-survey
 
D.  Best of the Board
 
III. THE CLOSING ARGUMENT: Constitution Masterclass -- The 30,000 Cap
 
  • Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 provides: “The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at least one Representative.”  Interpretations clash: was this intended to impose a cap on the number of people a member of the House could represent, or the number of Representatives that could ever be in the House? Equally, who can enforce the rights of Section 2 as applied to Representatives?
  • Congress capped the number of representatives by the Permanent Apportionment Act of June 18, 1929, and has not changed it since. A 1941 federal law provided the means to assign seats after the Census. States contested this when it lost a seat after the 1990 census due to this cap.  The Supreme Court acknowledged this was not a question submitted exclusively to the Legislative branch as a “political question” beyond its jurisdiction to resolve. Thus, the question turns to the import and intent of the 30,000 rule — is it a cap on the number of representatives or is it a ceiling on the number of people represented?
  • The phraseology can be read either way — that the restaint is on the “number of” Representatives in a ratio to the population rather than the population size represented by the District; or that the ratio intends a cap on the number of people represented by each representative. Linguistically, the former argument holds more sway; historically and philosophically, the latter argument proffers more persuasive evidence.
  • If we see it as sufficiently ambigious to turn to the Constitutional record, we find that the ratio of the house to the population was intended to be close to the people at a size no more than 30,000 people, reflected in the papers of the Founding Fathers themselves.
  • Indeed, the controversy over this language almost sunk the Constitution itself, despite the supporters arguing in Federalist Papers throughout that this was a minimum of people to be represented not merely a cap on the number of representatives in the House. So much so, that the very first amendment ever proposed was to clarify this point: that the minimum number of representatives must be proportional to the population in a strict ratio. Due to an editing error as passed by Congress, the amendment never passed, though mostly it faded as the Founding generation protected the intended ratio in fact.
  • The best plaintiff to seek such a relief would likely be a state without representation due to the absence of this maximum number of people per representative, given the prior case-law on the subject, or, of course, Congress itself could remedy the problem all by itself. 
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Briefer Barnes Brief: Thursday, May 7, 2026
  • Art of the Day
Something majestic of a colorful Oriole in flight, the feeling of freedom in the outstretched wings to soar in the sky, beyond gravity and above the landed earth, ready to roam and reign while seeking a safe and strong landing place for a bit of a rest. 
 
  • Board Post of Note
 
 
  • Economics
Burry of Big Short fame: Yen trade unwinding impacts. https://substack.com/@michaeljburry/note/c-205215463
 
  • Politics
Tucker & Massie.
 
  • Law
 
  • World
Peruvian elections feature left-right battle. https://boz.substack.com/p/peru-presidential-election-polls
Read full Article
post photo preview
The Briefer Barnes Brief: Wednesday, May 6, 2026

I. INTRODUCTION

  • A.  Art of the Day: Best way to start a day: early morning coffee. Maybe on a back porch. Maybe at a kitchen table. Maybe in a friendly diner. Maybe at a corner caffe. Maybe in a local coffee house. A tradition commenced in the hills of Yemen, it traversed the Islamic world until it reached Europe, where it turn the holy inspirational drink in the Turkish caves to the everyday place of chatter in the newborn cafes of Europe in the 17th century. Be that as it may, for many still, it signals the start of the day in a good way. 
  • B.  Board Post of the Day: https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/7905561/title
II. THE EVIDENCE 

A.  Barnes Library

  1. Economy: Snider on gas prices.
  2. Culture: World Cup interest dims. https://www.forbes.com/sites/suzannerowankelleher/2026/05/05/hotels-world-cup-non-event-so-far/
  3. Politics: Massie mini-documentary.
  4. Law: Abortion pill at SCOTUS. https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/05/abortion-pill-dispute-returns-to-supreme-court/
  5. Geopolitics: Larry Johnson on Trump’s mixed signals. https://sonar21.com/ball-of-confusion-trumps-mixed-signals-on-iran/
*Bonus: Animated Fed history told by some friends of mine years ago that they gave away for free. 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals